Patel Rahul A, Torabi Sina J, Kasle David A, Kayastha Darpan, Peter Manes R
Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Apr;132(4):410-416. doi: 10.1177/00034894221096980. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
To analyze trends in billing patterns, Medicare reimbursement, and practice-setting for otolaryngologists (ORLs) and other provider types performing in-office cerumen removal.
This retrospective study included data on Medicare-billing providers from the Medicare Part B: Provider Utilization and Payment Datafiles (2012-2018). Number of providers performing in-office cerumen removal, total sums and medians for Medicare reimbursements and services, and services per patient were gathered along with geographic distributions.
There have been near linear declines in number of general physicians and other provider types performing cerumen extractions with 42.6% and 40.7% declines, respectively, and near linear growth in number of ORLs and advanced practice providers (APPs) with 9.7% and 51.1% growth, respectively. At the median, general physicians, APPs, and other provider types have been billing for a similar and constant number of cerumen extractions per provider, while ORLs have seen a 10.6% increase. Total Medicare reimbursement to general physicians and other provider types has fallen 45.0% and 32.5%, respectively, and to ORLs and APPs has grown 16.9% and 103.4%, respectively. Compared to non-ORLs, ORLs tend to bill for cerumen extraction out of an urban setting rather than a rural setting (P < .001).
General physicians and other provider types are increasingly referring cerumen disimpaction patients to ORL physicians and allowing APPs to perform these procedures, indicating a change in landscape of medical practice among these providers. General physicians may be filling a need in the rural setting, where there are fewer ORLs practicing.
分析进行门诊耵聍清除术的耳鼻喉科医生(ORL)及其他医疗服务提供者类型的计费模式、医疗保险报销情况及执业环境的趋势。
这项回顾性研究纳入了医疗保险B部分:提供者利用和支付数据文件(2012 - 2018年)中医疗保险计费提供者的数据。收集了进行门诊耵聍清除术的提供者数量、医疗保险报销和服务的总和及中位数、每位患者的服务次数以及地理分布情况。
进行耵聍清除术的普通内科医生和其他医疗服务提供者类型的数量呈近似线性下降,分别下降了42.6%和40.7%,而ORL医生和高级实践提供者(APP)的数量呈近似线性增长,分别增长了9.7%和51.1%。中位数方面,普通内科医生、APP和其他医疗服务提供者类型每位提供者的耵聍清除术计费数量相似且保持不变,而ORL医生的计费数量增长了10.6%。医疗保险向普通内科医生和其他医疗服务提供者类型的报销总额分别下降了45.0%和32.5%,向ORL医生和APP的报销总额分别增长了16.9%和103.4%。与非ORL医生相比,ORL医生进行耵聍清除术的计费更倾向于在城市环境而非农村环境(P < 0.001)。
普通内科医生和其他医疗服务提供者类型越来越多地将耵聍清除患者转诊给ORL医生,并允许APP进行这些操作,这表明这些提供者之间的医疗实践格局发生了变化。普通内科医生可能满足了农村地区的需求,因为在农村地区执业的ORL医生较少。