Torabi Sina J, Vasandani Sagar, Patel Rahul A, Peter Manes R, Kuan Edward C
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;172(3):888-896. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1071. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
With a rising number of otolaryngology (ORL) graduates completing a fellowship, the number of generalists (also known as comprehensive ORLs [c-ORLs]), arguably the group of ORLs most needed, is likely to decrease. However, the practice and reimbursement patterns of c-ORLs have yet to be examined.
Cross-sectional retrospective analysis.
2019 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Datasets.
All ORLs were isolated (n = 8959), and then a random 10% sample was obtained. These 897 ORLs were queried for fellowship completion, isolating out those who have not completed a fellowship, and characterizing their practice patterns with regards to Medicare, the largest insurer in the US.
Within the random sample, 554 (61.8%) were c-ORLs, of which 47 (8.5%) practiced in an academic setting. c-ORLs billed a mean of 52.9 (SD: 26.6) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and community-based c-ORLs had a more diverse practice (P < .001). On average, Medicare paid $138,942 ($117,563) to each c-ORL for 1982.2 (2614.7) services for 451.7 (296.9) patients. Ninety-five percent of their total reimbursements were office-based. Of 250 unique CPT codes billed, 52.8% of all c-ORLs reimbursements were from evaluation and management services, 17.8% from rhinology, 9.7% from otology/neurotology, and 9% from laryngology.
Though surgery is an integral aspect of all ORLs' training and practice, c-ORLs practice in a largely office-based setting, at least with regard to Medicare patients. While c-ORLs clearly practice with a diverse skill set, their reimbursement patterns suggest rhinology makes up the largest proportion of their procedural practice.
随着越来越多的耳鼻喉科(ORL)毕业生完成专科培训,全科医生(也称为综合耳鼻喉科医生[c-ORL])的数量可能会减少,而全科医生可以说是最需要的耳鼻喉科医生群体。然而,c-ORL的执业和报销模式尚未得到研究。
横断面回顾性分析。
2019年医疗保险提供者利用和支付数据集。
筛选出所有耳鼻喉科医生(n = 8959),然后随机抽取10%的样本。对这897名耳鼻喉科医生询问其专科培训完成情况,排除未完成专科培训的医生,并描述他们针对美国最大的保险公司医疗保险的执业模式。
在随机样本中,554名(61.8%)是c-ORL,其中47名(8.5%)在学术环境中执业。c-ORL平均开具52.9项(标准差:26.6)现行程序编码(CPT),且以社区为基础的c-ORL执业范围更广(P <.001)。平均而言,医疗保险为每位c-ORL的1982.2项(2614.7项)服务支付了138,942美元(117,563美元),服务对象为451.7名(296.9名)患者。其总报销的95%是基于门诊的。在开具的250个独特CPT编码中,所有c-ORL报销的52.8%来自评估和管理服务,17.8%来自鼻科学,9.7%来自耳科学/神经耳科学,9%来自喉科学。
虽然手术是所有耳鼻喉科医生培训和执业的一个重要方面,但c-ORL至少在为医疗保险患者服务时,主要在门诊环境中执业。虽然c-ORL显然具备多种技能,但他们的报销模式表明鼻科学在其程序性执业中占比最大。