Zhong Michael, van der Walt Anneke, Monif Mastura, Hodgkinson Suzanne, Eichau Sara, Kalincik Tomas, Lechner-Scott Jeannette, Buzzard Katherine, Skibina Olga, Van Pesch Vincent, Butler Ernest, Prevost Julie, Girard Marc, Oh Jiwon, Butzkueven Helmut, Jokubaitis Vilija
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/MS Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mult Scler. 2023 Jan;29(1):119-129. doi: 10.1177/13524585221111677. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis commonly switch between disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Identifying predictors of relapse when switching could improve outcomes.
To determine predictors of relapse hazard when switching to cladribine.
Data of patients who switched to cladribine, grouped by prior disease-modifying therapy (pDMT; interferon-β/glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod or natalizumab (NTZ)), were extracted from the MSBase Registry. Predictors of relapse hazard during the treatment gap and the first year of cladribine therapy were determined.
Of 513 patients, 22 relapsed during the treatment gap, and 38 within 1 year of starting cladribine. Relapse in the year before pDMT cessation predicted treatment gap relapse hazard (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-5.71). After multivariable adjustment, relapse hazard on cladribine was predicted by relapse before pDMT cessation (HR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.01-4.02), treatment gap relapse (HR = 6.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.65-14.41), switch from NTZ (HR compared to injectable therapies 4.08, 95% CI = 1.35-12.33) and age at cladribine start (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99).
Relapse during or prior to the treatment gap, and younger age, are of prognostic relevance in the year after switching to cladribine. Switching from NTZ is also independently associated with greater relapse hazard.
复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者通常会在疾病修正治疗(DMTs)之间切换。识别切换时复发的预测因素可以改善治疗结果。
确定切换至克拉屈滨时复发风险的预测因素。
从MSBase注册库中提取切换至克拉屈滨的患者数据,并根据既往疾病修正治疗(pDMT;干扰素-β/醋酸格拉替雷、富马酸二甲酯、特立氟胺、芬戈莫德或那他珠单抗(NTZ))进行分组。确定治疗间隔期和克拉屈滨治疗第一年复发风险的预测因素。
在513例患者中,22例在治疗间隔期复发,38例在开始使用克拉屈滨后1年内复发。pDMT停药前一年的复发可预测治疗间隔期的复发风险(风险比(HR)=2.43,95%置信区间(CI)=1.03-5.71)。多变量调整后,克拉屈滨治疗的复发风险可由pDMT停药前的复发(HR=2.00,95%CI=1.01-4.02)、治疗间隔期复发(HR=6.18,95%置信区间(CI)=2.65-14.41)、从NTZ切换(与注射疗法相比HR=4.08,95%CI=1.35-12.33)以及开始使用克拉屈滨时的年龄(HR=0.96,95%CI=0.91-0.99)预测。
在切换至克拉屈滨后的一年中,治疗间隔期内或之前的复发以及较年轻的年龄具有预后相关性。从NTZ切换也与更高的复发风险独立相关。