Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):846-853. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005641. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
To define benchmark values for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) enabling unbiased comparisons.
Transplantation for PHC is used with reluctance in many centers and even contraindicated in several countries. Although benchmark values for LT are available, there is a lack of specific data on LT performed for PHC.
PHC patients considered for LT after Mayo-like protocol were analyzed in 17 reference centers in 2 continents over the recent 5-year period (2014-2018). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. Benchmark patients were defined as operated at high-volume centers (≥50 overall LT/year) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with a tumor diameter <3 cm, negative lymph nodes, and with the absence of relevant comorbidities. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th to 25th percentiles of the median values of all benchmark centers.
One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients underwent LT after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. Of those, 89.6% qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs were 90-day mortality ≤5.2%; comprehensive complication index at 1 year of ≤33.7; grade ≥3 complication rates ≤66.7%. These values were better than benchmark values for other indications of LT. Five-year disease-free survival was largely superior compared with a matched group of nodal negative patients undergoing curative liver resection (n=106) (62% vs 32%, P <0.001).
This multicenter benchmark study demonstrates that LT offers excellent outcomes with superior oncological results in early stage PHC patients, even in candidates for surgery. This provocative observation should lead to a change in available therapeutic algorithms for PHC.
确定肝移植(LT)在肝门部胆管癌(PHC)患者中的基准值,以便进行无偏倚比较。
许多中心对 PHC 的移植应用持保留态度,甚至在一些国家被禁止。尽管 LT 的基准值已经存在,但针对 PHC 进行 LT 的具体数据仍然缺乏。
对 2014 年至 2018 年期间在 2 大洲的 17 个参考中心中,按 Mayo 样方案考虑接受 LT 的 PHC 患者进行了分析。最低随访时间为 1 年。基准患者被定义为在接受新辅助放化疗后在高容量中心(每年整体 LT 手术量≥50 例)接受手术,肿瘤直径<3cm,淋巴结阴性,且无相关合并症。基准截止值是从所有基准中心中位数的第 75 到第 25 百分位数中推导出来的。
134 例患者在新辅助治疗完成后接受 LT。其中,89.6%符合基准病例标准。基准截止值为 90 天死亡率≤5.2%;1 年时综合并发症指数≤33.7;≥3 级并发症发生率≤66.7%。这些值优于 LT 其他适应证的基准值。与接受根治性肝切除术的淋巴结阴性患者(n=106)的匹配组相比,5 年无病生存率显著提高(62% vs 32%,P<0.001)。
这项多中心基准研究表明,LT 为早期 PHC 患者提供了极好的结果,并带来了卓越的肿瘤学结果,即使是手术候选人也是如此。这一令人振奋的观察结果应该导致 PHC 现有治疗方案的改变。