• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国:第一修正案下的商业言论保护

United States: Protecting Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.

机构信息

SCHOOL OF GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(2):265-275. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.51.

DOI:10.1017/jme.2022.51
PMID:35894570
Abstract

The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects commercial speech from government interference. Commercial speech has been defined by the US Supreme Court as speech that proposes a commercial transaction, such as marketing and labeling. Companies that produce products associated with public health harms, such as alcohol, tobacco, and food, thus have a constitutional right to market these products to consumers. This article will examine the evolution of US law related to the protection of commercial speech, often at the expense of public health. It will then identify outstanding questions related to the commercial speech doctrine and the few remaining avenues available in the United States to regulate commercial speech including the use of government speech and addressing deceptive and misleading commercial speech.

摘要

美国宪法第一修正案保护商业言论不受政府干预。美国最高法院将商业言论定义为提议商业交易的言论,例如营销和标签。生产与公共健康危害相关产品的公司,如酒精、烟草和食品,因此有权向消费者推销这些产品。本文将探讨美国法律在保护商业言论方面的演变,这往往是以牺牲公共健康为代价的。然后,它将确定与商业言论学说相关的悬而未决的问题,以及在美国管制商业言论的少数剩余途径,包括使用政府言论和解决欺骗性和误导性商业言论。

相似文献

1
United States: Protecting Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.美国:第一修正案下的商业言论保护
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(2):265-275. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.51.
2
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act and the First Amendment: why a substantial interest in protecting public health won't save some new restrictions on tobacco advertising.《家庭吸烟预防与烟草控制法案》与第一修正案:为何保护公众健康的重大利益无法挽救一些对烟草广告的新限制。
Food Drug Law J. 2010;65(4):873-900, iii.
3
Television food marketing to children revisited: the Federal Trade Commission has the constitutional and statutory authority to regulate.再度审视面向儿童的电视食品营销:联邦贸易委员会拥有宪法和法律赋予的监管权。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Spring;38(1):98-116. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00470.x.
4
First Amendment Limits on Compulsory Speech.第一修正案对强制言论的限制。
Food Drug Law J. 2016;71(3):519-43.
5
Commercial speech law and tobacco marketing: a comparative discussion of the United States and Canada.商业言论法与烟草营销:美国和加拿大的比较探讨
Am J Law Med. 2013;39(2-3):218-36. doi: 10.1177/009885881303900202.
6
Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.堕胎披露法与第一修正案:最高法院贝塞拉裁决对更广泛公共健康的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):412-418. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304871. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Visual gut punch: persuasion, emotion, and the constitutional meaning of graphic disclosure.视觉冲击:说服、情感与图形披露的宪法含义。
Cornell Law Rev. 2014;99(3):513-69.
8
A critical analysis of Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc.: Pandora's box at best.对索雷尔诉IMS健康公司案的批判性分析:充其量不过是潘多拉魔盒。
Food Drug Law J. 2012;67(2):191-241, ii.
9
Prescription data mining, medical privacy and the First Amendment: the U.S. Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS health Inc.处方数据挖掘、医疗隐私与第一修正案:美国最高法院审理的索雷尔诉艾美仕市场研究公司案
Ann Health Law. 2012 Winter;21(2):447-91, 4 p preceding i.
10
FDA-Required Tobacco Product Inserts & Onserts–and the First Amendment.美国食品药品监督管理局要求的烟草产品插页及随附插页——与第一修正案
Food Drug Law J. 2017;72(1):1-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the impact of novel social media policies in the USA restricting youth exposure to food and beverage advertisements: a protocol for a difference-in-difference study.评估美国限制青少年接触食品和饮料广告的新型社交媒体政策的影响:一项双重差分研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e105229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105229.
2
Policy changes to US federal infant feeding laws and regulations from 2014-2023: evidence that the 2022 infant formula shortage had a narrow policy impact.2014年至2023年美国联邦婴儿喂养法律法规的政策变化:2022年婴儿配方奶粉短缺产生有限政策影响的证据。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 6;3(6):qxaf096. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf096. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Not the Last Word: Direct-to-consumer Advertising Sends the Wrong Message.
并非最终定论:直接面向消费者的广告传递了错误信息。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):991-995. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003532. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
Effects of a front-of-package disclosure on accuracy in assessing children's drink ingredients: two randomised controlled experiments with US caregivers of young children.包装正面披露对评估儿童饮料成分准确性的影响:两项针对美国幼儿照顾者的随机对照实验。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2790-2801. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001969. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Algorithmic Fairness in the Roberts Court Era.罗伯茨法院时代的算法公平。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2023;28:519-530.