Risk Sciences International, Ottawa, Canada.
McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2022 Apr;52(4):325-343. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2022.2095979. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
We conducted a critical review on biomarkers of environmental manganese (Mn) exposure to answer the following questions: 1) are there reliable biomarkers of internal Mn exposure (Mn in biological matrices) associated with external metrics of Mn exposure (Mn in environmental media)? and 2) are there accurate reference values (RVs) for Mn in biological matrices? Three bibliographic databases were searched for relevant references and identified references were screened by two independent reviewers. Of the 6342 unique references identified, 86 articles were retained for data abstraction. Our analysis of currently available evidence suggests that Mn levels in blood and urine are not useful biomarkers of Mn exposure in non-occupational settings. The strength of the association between Mn in environmental media and saliva was variable. Findings regarding the utility of hair Mn as a biomarker of environmental Mn exposure are inconsistent. Measurements of Mn in teeth are technically challenging and findings on Mn in tooth components are scarce. In non-occupationally exposed individuals, bone Mn measurements using neutron activation analysis (IVNAA) are associated with large uncertainties. Findings suggest that Mn in nails may reflect Mn in environmental media and discriminate between groups of individuals exposed to different environmental Mn levels, although more research is needed. Currently, there is no strong evidence for any biological matrix as a valid biomarker of Mn exposure in non-occupational settings. Because of methodological limitations in studies aimed at derivation of RVs for Mn in biological materials, accurate RVs are scarce.
我们对环境锰 (Mn) 暴露的生物标志物进行了批判性评价,以回答以下问题:1)是否存在与环境 Mn 暴露(环境介质中的 Mn)相关的可靠内部 Mn 暴露(生物基质中的 Mn)生物标志物? 2)生物基质中 Mn 是否有准确的参考值 (RV)? 我们对三个文献数据库进行了相关参考文献的检索,并由两名独立评审员对已识别的参考文献进行了筛选。在确定的 6342 个唯一参考文献中,有 86 篇文章被保留用于数据提取。我们对现有证据的分析表明,血液和尿液中的 Mn 水平不适用于非职业环境中 Mn 暴露的生物标志物。环境介质中 Mn 与唾液之间的关联强度存在差异。关于头发 Mn 作为环境 Mn 暴露生物标志物的效用的研究结果不一致。牙齿中 Mn 的测量技术具有挑战性,而且牙齿成分中 Mn 的测量结果很少。在非职业暴露个体中,使用中子活化分析 (IVNAA) 进行的骨 Mn 测量存在较大的不确定性。研究结果表明,指甲中的 Mn 可能反映环境介质中的 Mn,并区分暴露于不同环境 Mn 水平的个体,但需要进一步研究。目前,没有任何生物基质作为非职业环境中 Mn 暴露的有效生物标志物的有力证据。由于旨在确定生物材料中 Mn 的 RV 的研究存在方法学限制,因此准确的 RV 很少。