Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):862-869. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0369. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
The nociceptive system has been implicated in acupuncture analgesia, although acupuncture's precise mechanism of action remains unknown. Electric pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) have emerged as an effective and reliable electrophysiologic method for evaluation of the human nociceptive system by electric stimulation of nociceptive Aδ and C fibers. This pilot mechanistic study aims to assess the feasibility of using advanced PREP techniques together with electroacupuncture and to use PREPs to characterize acupuncture's effect on nociception. Seven healthy volunteers underwent a previously designed electroacupuncture protocol using acupoints in the legs bilaterally, which has been demonstrated to induce systemic analgesia. Advanced PREP techniques involving tripolar stimulating electrode, varying interstimulus interval, and incorporating a cognitive task during PREPs were used. PREPs were assessed before electroacupuncture, during electroacupuncture, and 30 min after electroacupuncture. Subjective pain perception in response to the PREP-related electric pain stimuli delivered to the nondominant hand was assessed on the visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline, during electroacupuncture, and 30 min postelectroacupuncture. Reliable PREP N1, P1, and N2 waves were obtained from all subjects at the following average latencies: N1 = 131.5 msec, P1 = 189.4 msec, and N2 = 231.1 msec. Electroacupuncture caused a significant reduction in PREP N1P1 wave amplitudes from 25.6 to 15.4 μV ( = 0.006) and electric pain perception on the VAS-from 2.86 to 2.14 ( = 0.008), compared to baseline. These effects were sustained at 30 min postacupuncture with N1P1 wave amplitude 17.2 μV ( = 0.030) and VAS 2.28 ( = 0.030), compared to baseline. Electroacupuncture causes significant changes in objective nociception, measured by PREP N1P1 wave amplitudes, and in subjective nociception, measured by the VAS, and these effects are sustained for 30 min after electroacupuncture. Planned future studies will involve chronic pain populations and will aim to assess acupuncture's longer term analgesic effects.
伤害感受系统与针刺镇痛有关,尽管针刺的确切作用机制尚不清楚。电刺激伤害感受性 Aδ和 C 纤维产生的疼痛相关诱发电位 (PREP) 已成为评估人类伤害感受系统的一种有效且可靠的电生理学方法。这项初步的机制研究旨在评估使用先进的 PREP 技术结合电针的可行性,并使用 PREP 来描述针刺对伤害感受的影响。
七名健康志愿者接受了先前设计的双侧腿部电针方案,该方案已被证明可诱导全身镇痛。使用三极刺激电极、不同的刺激间隔以及在 PREP 期间纳入认知任务的先进 PREP 技术。在电针前、电针期间和电针后 30 分钟评估 PREP。在基线、电针期间和电针后 30 分钟,用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评估非优势手接受与 PREP 相关的电刺激时的主观疼痛感知。
所有受试者均获得可靠的 PREP N1、P1 和 N2 波,潜伏期平均为:N1=131.5msec,P1=189.4msec,N2=231.1msec。与基线相比,电针使 PREP N1P1 波幅度从 25.6 降至 15.4μV(=0.006),VAS 上的电刺激疼痛感知从 2.86 降至 2.14(=0.008)。与基线相比,这些效果在电针后 30 分钟持续存在,N1P1 波幅度为 17.2μV(=0.030),VAS 为 2.28(=0.030)。
电针可显著改变客观伤害感受,通过 PREP N1P1 波幅度测量,以及主观伤害感受,通过 VAS 测量,这些影响在电针后 30 分钟内持续存在。计划中的未来研究将涉及慢性疼痛人群,并旨在评估针刺的长期镇痛效果。