Özgül Özüm Simal, Maier Christoph, Enax-Krumova Elena K, Vollert Jan, Fischer Marc, Tegenthoff Martin, Höffken Oliver
Department of Neurology, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Department of Pain Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Apr 24;647:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
Pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) is an established electrophysiological method to evaluate the signal transmission of electrically stimulated A-delta fibres. Although prerequisite for its clinical use, test-retest-reliability and side-to-side differences of bilateral stimulation in healthy subjects have not been examined yet. We performed PREP twice within 3-14days in 33 healthy subjects bilaterally by stimulating the dorsal hand. Detection (DT) and pain thresholds (PT) after electrical stimulation, the corresponding pain ratings, latencies of P0, N1, P1 and N2 components and the corresponding amplitudes were assessed. Impact of electrically induced pain intensity, age, sex, and arm length on PREP was analysed. MANOVA, t-Test, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest real difference (SRD), Bland-Altmann-Analysis as well as ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis. Measurement from both sides on both days resulted in mean N1-latencies from 142.39±18.12ms to 144.03±16.62ms and in mean N1P1-amplitudes from 39.04±12.26μV to 40.53±12.9μV. Analysis of a side-to-side effect showed for the N1-latency a F-value of 0.038 and for the N1P1-amplitude of 0.004 (p>0.8). We found intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) from 0.88 to 0.93 and a standard error of measurement (SEM)<10% of mean values for all measurements concerning the N1-Latency and N1P1-amplitude. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement and Bland-Altman-Analyses revealed excellent test-retest-reliability for N1-latency and N1P1-amplitude without systematic error and there was no side-to-side effect on PREP. N1-latency (r=0.35, p<0.05) and N1P1-amplitude (r=-0.45, p<0.05) correlated with age and additionally N1-latency correlated with arm length (r=0.45, p<0.001). In contrast, pain intensity during the stimulation had no effect on both N1-latency and N1P1-amplitude. In summary, PREP showed high test-retest-reliability and negligible side-to-side differences concerning the commonly used parameters N1-latency and N1P1-amplitude.
疼痛相关诱发电位(PREP)是一种用于评估电刺激A-δ纤维信号传导的成熟电生理方法。尽管其临床应用的前提条件已明确,但健康受试者双侧刺激的重测信度和左右差异尚未得到检验。我们在33名健康受试者双侧手背进行电刺激,在3至14天内进行了两次PREP检测。评估了电刺激后的检测阈值(DT)和疼痛阈值(PT)、相应的疼痛评分、P0、N1、P1和N2成分的潜伏期以及相应的波幅。分析了电诱发疼痛强度、年龄、性别和手臂长度对PREP的影响。采用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)、t检验、组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小实际差异(SRD)、布兰德-奥特曼分析(Bland-Altmann-Analysis)以及协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行统计分析。两天内双侧测量结果显示,N1潜伏期均值从142.39±18.12毫秒到144.03±16.62毫秒,N1P1波幅均值从39.04±12.26微伏到40.53±12.9微伏。左右侧效应分析显示,N1潜伏期的F值为0.038,N1P1波幅的F值为0.004(p>0.8)。我们发现,关于N1潜伏期和N1P1波幅的所有测量,组内相关系数(ICC)在0.88至0.93之间,测量标准误差(SEM)<均值的10%。组内相关系数、测量标准误差和布兰德-奥特曼分析显示,N1潜伏期和N1P1波幅具有出色的重测信度,无系统误差,且PREP无左右侧效应。N1潜伏期(r=0.35,p<0.05)和N1P1波幅(r=-0.45,p<0.05)与年龄相关,此外N1潜伏期与手臂长度相关(r=0.45,p<0.001)。相比之下,刺激期间的疼痛强度对N1潜伏期和N1P1波幅均无影响。总之,对于常用参数N1潜伏期和N1P1波幅,PREP显示出高重测信度和可忽略不计的左右差异。