NSW Health Pathology, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Concord Repatriation and General Hospital, Concord, Australia.
Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Jun 13;107(2):355-358. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1289. Print 2022 Aug 17.
Strongyloides stercoralis is a nematode endemic to subtropical and tropical regions that may cause asymptomatic carriage, peripheral eosinophilia, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary disease, or hyperinfection syndrome. Conventional diagnostic methods for strongyloidiasis include feces microscopy and culture, with low sensitivity in chronic infection due to the low helminth burden, and serology, which may be prone to false-negative results with immunocompromise and false-positive results with other infections and immunological disorders. We evaluated a laboratory-developed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), detecting the 18S SSU ribosomal RNA gene, compared with conventional diagnostic methods, using serology via ELISA as the gold-standard. The population studied included tertiary hospital inpatients and outpatients residing in a nonendemic area. Seven hundred fifty unfixed stool specimens submitted sequentially between 2014 and 2018 were tested for S. stercoralis via microscopy and RT-PCR. Agar plate culture (APC), Harada-Mori culture (HMC), and ELISA were performed in conjunction with 141, 135, and 177 of the specimens, respectively. RT-PCR yielded 13 positive and 730 negative results, with inhibition in seven specimens. ELISA yielded 53 positive, 18 equivocal, and 106 negative results. Results for direct diagnostic methods obtained after treatment with ivermectin were excluded from the performance analysis. Compared with ELISA, RT-PCR, microscopy, APC, and HMC exhibited sensitivities of 38%, 6%, 3%, and 0%, respectively, and specificities of 100%. Given the low sensitivities commensurate with testing a population with remote infection and thus low parasite burden, we recommend a combination of serological and molecular diagnostic testing to achieve the best balance of sensitivity and specificity.
粪类圆线虫是一种流行于亚热带和热带地区的线虫,可引起无症状携带、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多、皮肤、胃肠道和肺部疾病或过度感染综合征。粪类圆线虫病的常规诊断方法包括粪便显微镜检查和培养,但由于寄生虫负荷低,在慢性感染中敏感性较低,血清学可能容易出现免疫功能低下的假阴性结果和其他感染及免疫性疾病的假阳性结果。我们评估了实验室开发的实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),检测 18S SSU 核糖体 RNA 基因,与使用 ELISA 进行的血清学作为金标准的常规诊断方法进行比较。研究人群包括居住在非流行地区的三级医院住院和门诊患者。2014 年至 2018 年期间连续提交了 750 份未固定的粪便标本,通过显微镜检查和 RT-PCR 检测粪类圆线虫。琼脂平板培养(APC)、原田-森培养(HMC)和 ELISA 分别与 141、135 和 177 份标本一起进行。RT-PCR 产生了 13 个阳性和 730 个阴性结果,其中 7 个标本有抑制。ELISA 产生了 53 个阳性、18 个可疑和 106 个阴性结果。伊维菌素治疗后直接诊断方法的结果排除在性能分析之外。与 ELISA 相比,RT-PCR、显微镜检查、APC 和 HMC 的敏感性分别为 38%、6%、3%和 0%,特异性均为 100%。鉴于与感染远程和寄生虫负荷低的人群进行检测的敏感性相当低,我们建议结合血清学和分子诊断检测,以达到最佳的敏感性和特异性平衡。