Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271486. eCollection 2022.
This study explores the difference in child emotion regulation (ER) and parenting between a heterogeneous clinical sample (ClinS) and a community sample (ComS). We hypothesized that parents of the ClinS would report more dysfunctional child ER and more dysfunctional parenting regarding the child's negative emotions than parents of the ComS. Further, we aimed to predict child ER by parenting behavior, parents' ER, and mental health. Parents of children and adolescents (aged 6-18 years) seeking treatment at an outpatient clinic were compared to a matched sample of parents in a ComS (n = 57 each group). As predicted, the children in the clinical group were reported to use less reappraisal and more suppression than ComS children. No difference was found in dysfunctional emotion parenting between the groups. Reappraisal in parents and supportive reactions to negative emotions predicted reappraisal in children. No predictor was found for child suppression. Child emotion regulation and parents' psychopathology were not associated. These results could suggest new elements for prevention and intervention programs with parents concerning their own emotion regulation and their reaction to negative emotions in children.
本研究探讨了异质临床样本(ClinS)和社区样本(ComS)儿童情绪调节(ER)和养育方式的差异。我们假设 ClinS 的父母报告的孩子负面情绪的儿童 ER 和养育方式更不健全,比 ComS 的父母更不健全。此外,我们旨在通过养育行为、父母的 ER 和心理健康来预测儿童的 ER。我们将在门诊诊所接受治疗的儿童和青少年(6-18 岁)的父母与 ComS 中匹配的父母样本(每组 57 人)进行比较。正如所预测的,与 ComS 儿童相比,临床组的儿童报告使用更少的重新评价和更多的抑制。两组之间的不良情绪养育方式没有差异。父母的重新评价和对负面情绪的支持反应预测了孩子的重新评价。对于孩子的抑制,没有找到预测因素。儿童情绪调节和父母的精神病理学没有关联。这些结果可能为预防和干预计划提供新的元素,涉及父母自身的情绪调节以及对孩子负面情绪的反应。