• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架内再狭窄后椎动脉起源狭窄支架置入术:风险评估的列线图。

In-stent restenosis after vertebral artery origin stenosis stenting: a nomogram for risk assessment.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Capital Medical University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.

Evidence-based Medicine Center, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(e1):e41-e45. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-019091. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-019091
PMID:35896318
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To propose a nomogram for individual risk assessment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) stenting.

METHODS

We included 793 patients with VAOS treated with stenting from October 2006 to May 2013, with a median follow-up of 27.8 months. Cox regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were adopted for variable selection. The nomogram was formulated and validated by concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. An in-stent restenosis risk table (ISR-RT) was subsequently generated for risk stratification. Differences between low-, intermediate-, and high-risk levels were shown by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

The training and validation set included 594 and 199 patients, with a mean ISR rate of 37.2% and 35.2%, respectively. Stent type (HR=1.64, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.14), stent diameter (HR=2.48, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.48), history of peripheral vascular disease (HR=2.17, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.00), history of transit ischemic attack (HR=1.45, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.14), and left-side involvement (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.69) were included in the nomogram. The C-indexes at 6 and 12 months were 0.650 and 0.611 in the training set, and 0.713 and 0.603 in the validation set, respectively. Compared with low-risk patients, the intermediate- and high-level group had 1.46 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.04; p=0.0235) and 2.28 (95% CI 1.64 to 3.17; p<0.0001) higher chances of developing ISR in 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram and a risk evaluation table were developed with good predictive ability for in-stent restenosis among patients with VAOS, which could serve as a practical approach for individualized risk evaluation.

摘要

目的

提出一种用于评估椎动脉起始部狭窄(VAOS)支架置入后支架内再狭窄(ISR)个体风险的列线图。

方法

我们纳入了 2006 年 10 月至 2013 年 5 月期间接受支架置入治疗的 793 例 VAOS 患者,中位随访时间为 27.8 个月。采用 Cox 回归和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归进行变量选择。通过一致性指数(C 指数)和校准曲线来构建和验证列线图。随后生成了支架内再狭窄风险表(ISR-RT)进行风险分层。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示低、中、高危水平之间的差异,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。

结果

训练集和验证集分别纳入了 594 例和 199 例患者,ISR 发生率分别为 37.2%和 35.2%。支架类型(HR=1.64,95%CI 1.26 至 2.14)、支架直径(HR=2.48,95%CI 1.77 至 3.48)、外周血管疾病史(HR=2.17,95%CI 1.17 至 4.00)、短暂性脑缺血发作史(HR=1.45,95%CI 1.05 至 2.14)和左侧受累(HR=1.33,95%CI 1.04 至 1.69)被纳入列线图。训练集的 6 个月和 12 个月 C 指数分别为 0.650 和 0.611,验证集的 C 指数分别为 0.713 和 0.603。与低危患者相比,中危和高危组在 2 年内发生 ISR 的几率分别为 1.46(95%CI 1.05 至 2.04;p=0.0235)和 2.28(95%CI 1.64 至 3.17;p<0.0001)。

结论

本研究构建了一种预测 VAOS 支架置入后 ISR 发生风险的列线图和风险评估表,具有良好的预测能力,可作为个体化风险评估的实用方法。

相似文献

1
In-stent restenosis after vertebral artery origin stenosis stenting: a nomogram for risk assessment.支架内再狭窄后椎动脉起源狭窄支架置入术:风险评估的列线图。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(e1):e41-e45. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-019091. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Arterial occlusions increase the risk of in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery ostium stenting.动脉闭塞增加椎动脉开口支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的风险。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):574-578. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014243. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Editor's Choice - Development of a Risk Prediction Nomogram for Carotid Re-Stenosis in the One Year RECAST Registry.编辑精选——RECAST 登记研究中颈动脉再狭窄的风险预测列线图的建立。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;68(4):433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.033. Epub 2024 May 25.
4
Clinical outcomes and influencing factors of in-stent restenosis after stenting for symptomatic stenosis of the vertebral V1 segment.症状性椎动脉V1段狭窄支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的临床结局及影响因素
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1406-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.042. Epub 2018 May 19.
5
Development and validation of a risk prediction nomogram for in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者支架内再狭窄风险预测列线图的建立与验证。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02255-4.
6
Balloon-Assisted Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis After Vertebral Artery Ostium Stenting: Experiences From One Single Center.球囊辅助血管成形术治疗椎动脉开口支架置入术后支架内再狭窄:单中心经验。
Neurologist. 2022 May 1;27(3):106-110. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000383.
7
A Comparison of Different Endovascular Treatment for Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis.不同血管内治疗方法治疗椎动脉起始段狭窄的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e1290-e1297. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.026. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Risk factors for in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery stenting of V1 segment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.支架内再狭窄风险因素:V1 段椎动脉支架置入术后的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;100(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30296. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Long-Term Risk of In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Fracture for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenting.颅外椎动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄和支架断裂的长期风险。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;29(4):701-706. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0708-y. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
The Relationship Between APOE Gene Polymorphism and In-stent Restenosis After Stenting at the Beginning of the Vertebral Artery.载脂蛋白 E 基因多态性与椎动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的关系。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e277-e282. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.158. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery reconstruction for symptomatic vertebral artery origin in-stent restenosis or occlusion: a ten-year retrospective cohort study.颅外椎动脉重建术治疗有症状的椎动脉起始部支架内再狭窄或闭塞的疗效:一项十年回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2529572. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2529572. Epub 2025 Jul 11.