From CAPHRI Institute, Maastricht University (AD); University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); University of Eastern Finland (AH); University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, England (PHE); University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (PM); Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Radboud University Nijmegen, and Australian National University (CVW).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):762-792. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.04.210411.
This article is the second part of a novel scoping review of the international literature that presents those key elements that underpin the foundational activities of Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs). In this article, we examine the external environment and the intersection between the internal and external environment domains.
We searched electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and SAGE for publications in English between 1/1/1965 and 9/15/2021. We also searched reference lists of selected publications, gray literature and other online sources. Inductive thematic analysis was applied to construct the main themes, subthemes, and key elements from a scoping review covering up to 10 years of reported experiences of each of the 98 PBRNs that met the inclusion criteria.
In this study we present 2 main themes: "Stakeholders at the Intersection Between the Internal and External Environment" and the "External Environment." The first is linked to the subthemes "Patient and Community Stakeholders" and "Other Healthcare Stakeholders" and 11 key elements. The second relates to the subthemes "National Health System," "Institutional/Governmental Support, National/State Policy and Regulatory Environment" "Professional Organizations," "Leveraging Previous Research and PBRN Experience and Interacting with Other Networks" and "Health Information Technology (HIT) and HIT Vendors" and 21 key elements.
Despite variations in geography, time, and healthcare context, PBRNs shared many similar developmental experiences over the past 5 decades. Their external environment contributed significantly to their developmental trajectories during the first 10 years of their operation.
本文是对国际文献进行新型范围综述的第二部分,呈现了支撑基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)基础活动的关键要素。在本文中,我们研究了外部环境以及内部环境和外部环境领域之间的交叉点。
我们在电子数据库中进行了搜索,包括 MEDLINE(PubMed)、OVID、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、Scopus 和 SAGE,检索了 1965 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 15 日期间以英文发表的文献。我们还搜索了选定出版物的参考文献列表、灰色文献和其他在线资源。我们应用归纳主题分析,从涵盖 98 个 PBRN 的报告经验的范围综述中构建主要主题、子主题和关键要素,这些 PBRN 符合纳入标准。
在本研究中,我们呈现了 2 个主要主题:“内部和外部环境交叉点的利益相关者”和“外部环境”。第一个主题与“患者和社区利益相关者”和“其他医疗保健利益相关者”这两个子主题以及 11 个关键要素相关联。第二个主题涉及“国家卫生系统”、“机构/政府支持、国家/州政策和监管环境”、“专业组织”、“利用以前的研究和 PBRN 经验并与其他网络互动”以及“健康信息技术(HIT)和 HIT 供应商”和 21 个关键要素。
尽管地理位置、时间和医疗保健背景存在差异,但 PBRN 在过去 50 年中经历了许多相似的发展过程。在运营的前 10 年中,其外部环境对其发展轨迹产生了重大影响。