• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证恋童癖犯罪现场行为筛查量表。

Validating the Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Institute of Psychology, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, 14197, Berlin, Germany.

École de criminologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4085-4096. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02354-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-022-02354-z
PMID:35896938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9663345/
Abstract

The Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior (SSPC) is a seven-item structured rating scale assessing pedophilic sexual arousal. In the current study, we cross-validated the scale's convergent validity using multiple measures of sexual interest in children (clinical diagnosis of pedophilia, the high fixation/low social competence type of the MTC:CM4, and phallometric assessment of sexual interests toward children) in two independent samples (USA and Canada). In both samples and in relation to all three criteria, the SSPC showed acceptable (phallometry) to excellent (clinical assessment) diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the SSPC showed incremental validity in relation to the Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interest and at times outperformed it in convergent validity analyses. The current study also provides psychometric information that can help users choose an appropriate SSPC cutoff score.

摘要

性犯罪场景行为筛查量表(SSPC)是一种七项结构评定量表,用于评估恋童癖性唤起。在本研究中,我们使用多种儿童性兴趣的测量方法(恋童癖的临床诊断、MTC:CM4 的高固定/低社交能力类型和对儿童的性兴趣的阴茎测量评估),在两个独立的样本(美国和加拿大)中对该量表的聚合效度进行了交叉验证。在两个样本中,以及与所有三个标准相关的情况下,SSPC 表现出了可接受(阴茎测量)到极好(临床评估)的诊断准确性。此外,SSPC 在与恋童癖兴趣筛查量表的关联中表现出了增量有效性,并且在某些情况下在聚合有效性分析中表现优于后者。本研究还提供了心理计量学信息,可帮助用户选择适当的 SSPC 截断分数。

相似文献

1
Validating the Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior.验证恋童癖犯罪现场行为筛查量表。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4085-4096. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02354-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): Development and Criterion-Related Validation.修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2):编制与效标关联效度验证
Sex Abuse. 2017 Oct;29(7):619-635. doi: 10.1177/1079063215612444. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
4
Measuring Pedophilic Sexual Interest.测量恋童癖性兴趣。
J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):378-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Convergent and Predictive Associations of Three Measures of Pedophilic Interest.三种恋童癖兴趣测量方法的会聚和预测关联。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Oct;33(7):816-838. doi: 10.1177/1079063220968042. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Validation of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) in Portugal.葡萄牙修订后的恋童癖筛查量表(SSPI-2)的验证。
Sex Abuse. 2024 Oct;36(7):848-869. doi: 10.1177/10790632241268502. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.阴茎勃起测试在儿童性兴趣评估中的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: a comparison of various classification procedures.恋童癖诊断的效用:各种分类程序的比较。
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Jun;36(3):423-36. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9091-x. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
9
Development and Preliminary Validation of the Pedophilic Fantasies, Desires, and Activities Questionnaire.性幻想、欲望和行为问卷的编制及初步验证。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Aug;64(10-11):1134-1155. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19883758. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests: Predictive and Concurrent Validity.修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表:预测效度与同时效度
Sex Abuse. 2017 Oct;29(7):636-657. doi: 10.1177/1079063215618375. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Predictive Validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2).修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Aug;35(5):649-663. doi: 10.1177/10790632221149696. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Pedophilia is a taxon among 706 adult males assessed at a civil commitment center.恋童癖是在民事承诺中心评估的 706 名成年男性中的一个分类。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022 Feb;131(2):209-220. doi: 10.1037/abn0000735.
2
Stigmatization of Paraphilias and Psychological Conditions Linked to Sexual Offending.性偏好障碍和与性犯罪相关的心理状况的污名化。
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):438-447. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1754748. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Taxometric Analysis of the Latent Structure of Pedophilic Interest.恋童癖兴趣的潜在结构的税则分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Nov;47(8):2223-2240. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1225-4. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
The Etiology of Risk in Sexual Offenders: A Preliminary Model.性犯罪者风险的病因学:初步模型。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Jun;31(4):431-455. doi: 10.1177/1079063218759325. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
The uncertainty of psychological and psychiatric diagnoses.心理和精神诊断的不确定性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Apr;30(4):556-560. doi: 10.1037/pas0000524. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
The Motivation-Facilitation Model of Sexual Offending.性犯罪的动机促进模型。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Feb;31(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1079063217720919. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.阴茎勃起测试在儿童性兴趣评估中的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
9
Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)及拟议的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中恋童癖标准的信度与效度:对《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)及下一版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》的启示
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Dec;49(Pt A):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Convergent Validity of Three Measures of Sexual Sadism: Value of a Dimensional Measure.性施虐三种测量方法的收敛效度:维度测量的价值
Sex Abuse. 2018 Mar;30(2):192-208. doi: 10.1177/1079063216649592. Epub 2016 May 26.