School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jul 27;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01331-y.
Policies aimed at restricting the marketing of high fat, salt and sugar products have been proposed as one way of improving population diet and reducing obesity. In 2019, Transport for London implemented advertising restrictions on high fat, salt and sugar products. A controlled interrupted time-series analysis comparing London with a north of England control, suggested that the advertising restrictions had resulted in a reduction in household energy purchases. The aim of the study presented here was to estimate the health benefits, cost savings and equity impacts of the Transport for London policy using a health economic modelling approach, from an English National Health Service and personal social services perspective.
A diabetes prevention microsimulation model was modified to incorporate the London population and Transport for London advertising intervention. Conversion of calorie to body mass index reduction was mediated through an approximation of a mathematical model estimating weight loss. Outcomes gathered included incremental obesity, long-term diabetes and cardiovascular disease events, quality-adjusted life years, healthcare costs saved and net monetary benefit. Slope index of inequality was calculated for proportion of people with obesity across socioeconomic groups to assess equity impacts.
The results show that the Transport for London policy was estimated to have resulted in 94,867 (4.8%) fewer individuals with obesity, and to reduce incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease by 2,857 and 1,915 cases respectively within three years post intervention. The policy would produce an estimated 16,394 additional quality-adjusted life-years and save £218 m in NHS and social care costs over the lifetime of the current population. Greater benefits (e.g. a 37% higher gain in quality-adjusted life-years) were expected to accrue to individuals from the most socioeconomically deprived groups compared to the least deprived.
This analysis suggests that there are considerable potential health and economic gains from restricting the advertisement of high fat, salt and sugar products. The population health and economic impacts of the Transport for London advertising restrictions are likely to have reduced health inequalities in London.
为改善人口饮食结构和降低肥胖率,有人提议实施限制高油、高盐和高糖产品营销的政策。2019 年,伦敦交通局对高油、高盐和高糖产品实施了广告限制。一项针对伦敦和英格兰北部的对照控制的干预性中断时间序列分析表明,这些广告限制导致家庭购买的能源减少。本研究旨在从英国国家医疗服务体系和个人社会服务的角度,采用健康经济建模方法,评估伦敦交通局政策的健康效益、成本节约和公平影响。
修改了糖尿病预防微观模拟模型,纳入了伦敦人口和伦敦交通局广告干预措施。卡路里到体重指数减少的转化通过估算体重减轻的数学模型来实现。收集的结果包括增量肥胖、长期糖尿病和心血管疾病事件、质量调整生命年、节省的医疗保健成本和净货币效益。不平等斜率指数用于评估社会经济群体中肥胖人口的比例,以评估公平影响。
研究结果表明,伦敦交通局政策预计将减少 94867 名(4.8%)肥胖者,并且在干预后三年内,糖尿病和心血管疾病的发病率将分别减少 2857 例和 1915 例。该政策预计将在当前人口的生命周期内产生 16394 个额外的质量调整生命年,并节省 NHS 和社会护理费用 2.18 亿英镑。与最贫困群体相比,社会经济地位较低的个体预计将获得更大的收益(例如,质量调整生命年增加 37%)。
这项分析表明,限制高油、高盐和高糖产品的广告可能会带来可观的健康和经济效益。伦敦交通局广告限制对人口健康和经济的影响可能降低了伦敦的健康不平等。