• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾地区采用混合式在线团队学习法为社区医疗照护提供者开办健康素养培训方案。

Health literacy training program for community healthcare providers using hybrid online team-based learning in Taiwan.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien City, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Humanities, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03646-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03646-7
PMID:35897091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy (HL) has proven to be a determining factor influencing the health of individuals. Community health providers (CHPs) work on the front line of improving public HL. Increasing their understanding of HL and their ability to incorporate HL into healthcare can reduce obstacles in healthcare services. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an HL training program for CHP by using the hybrid online team-based learning (TBL) model.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study and focused group interviews were conducted. We developed a six weeks HL online course for CHPs. The program included teaching videos for pre-class preparation, a 90-min online TBL model, and a case discussion in the last two weeks. Team application activities were designed for each class to enhance knowledge application. A total of 81 CHPs from 20 public health centers took the course and provided complete data for analysis. Learning effectiveness was evaluated based on the familiarity, attitude, and confidence in implementing HL practices, course satisfaction, and participants' learning experiences.

RESULTS

The comparison showed that the participants' familiarity with HL (4.29 ± 1.76 vs 6.92 ± 1.52, p < .001), attitude (7.39 ± 1.88 vs 8.10 ± 1.44, p = .004), and confidence in implementing HL practices (6.22 ± 1.48 vs 7.61 ± 1.34, p < .001) increased after the course. The average satisfaction with the teaching strategies was 4.06 ± .53 points, the average helpfulness to practice was 4.13 ± .55 points, and the overall feedback on satisfaction with learning was 4.06 ± .58 points (the full score was 5 points). According to the learning experience of the 20 participants in the focus group discussion, the experiences of teaching strategies and the learning experiences of the HL course were summed up into two categories, seven themes, and 13 subthemes. The results showed a positive experience with the hybrid online TBL program.

CONCLUSION

The use of hybrid online TBL model is a feasible and valid approach for the HL training of CHPs. The result can serve as a reference for the on-the-job training of various healthcare workers.

摘要

背景

健康素养(HL)已被证明是影响个体健康的决定因素。社区卫生服务提供者(CHP)在提高公众 HL 方面发挥着重要作用。提高他们对 HL 的理解以及将 HL 融入医疗保健的能力,可以减少医疗服务中的障碍。本研究采用混合在线团队学习(TBL)模式评估 CHP 的 HL 培训计划的效果。

方法

进行了一项准实验研究和焦点小组访谈。我们为 CHP 开发了一个为期六周的 HL 在线课程。该课程包括课前准备的教学视频、90 分钟的在线 TBL 模式和最后两周的案例讨论。为每节课设计了团队应用活动,以增强知识的应用。共有 81 名来自 20 个公共卫生中心的 CHP 参加了该课程,并提供了完整的数据进行分析。学习效果基于对 HL 实践实施的熟悉程度、态度和信心、课程满意度以及参与者的学习体验进行评估。

结果

结果显示,参与者对 HL 的熟悉程度(4.29±1.76 与 6.92±1.52,p<.001)、态度(7.39±1.88 与 8.10±1.44,p=.004)和实施 HL 实践的信心(6.22±1.48 与 7.61±1.34,p<.001)在课程后均有所提高。对教学策略的平均满意度为 4.06±.53 分,对实践的平均帮助度为 4.13±.55 分,对学习满意度的整体反馈为 4.06±.58 分(满分 5 分)。根据 20 名焦点小组讨论参与者的学习经验,总结出教学策略的经验和 HL 课程的学习经验分为两类、七个主题和 13 个次主题。结果表明,混合在线 TBL 模式的使用是 CHP 进行 HL 培训的一种可行且有效的方法。结果可为各种医护人员的在职培训提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ece/9327261/25390d62db53/12909_2022_3646_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ece/9327261/25390d62db53/12909_2022_3646_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ece/9327261/25390d62db53/12909_2022_3646_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy training program for community healthcare providers using hybrid online team-based learning in Taiwan.台湾地区采用混合式在线团队学习法为社区医疗照护提供者开办健康素养培训方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03646-7.
2
Familiarity, Attitude, and Confidence of Health Literacy Practice among Community Healthcare Providers in Taiwan.台湾社区医疗照护提供者健康素养实务之熟悉度、态度与信心。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312610.
3
Effectiveness of the refined health literacy course on improving the health literacy competencies of undergraduate nursing students: quantitative and qualitative perspectives.精细化健康素养课程对提高本科护生健康素养能力的效果:定量和定性视角。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2173042. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2173042.
4
Comparing the effectiveness of a hybrid and in-person courses of wheelchair service provision knowledge: A controlled quasi-experimental study in India and Mexico.比较混合式和面对面轮椅服务提供知识课程的效果:印度和墨西哥的一项对照类准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217872. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
6
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
7
Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master's degree in nursing education course.团队学习与基于讲座的教学与小组讨论在护理教育硕士课程中的比较。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105043. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105043. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
8
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Improving health literacy through adult basic education in Australia.通过澳大利亚的成人基础教育提高健康素养。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):867-877. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax028.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于团队的学习教学法提高教育质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Hybrid teaching mode including physical, online, and flipped classroom learning for dental education in Taiwan.台湾牙科教育的混合教学模式,包括面授、线上及翻转课堂学习。
J Dent Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):624-625. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Familiarity, Attitude, and Confidence of Health Literacy Practice among Community Healthcare Providers in Taiwan.台湾社区医疗照护提供者健康素养实务之熟悉度、态度与信心。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312610.
3
Team-based learning in nursing education: A scoping review.
护理教育中的基于团队的学习:一项范围综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):903-917. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15599. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation.团队学习:设计、促进和参与。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
5
Effects of an Electrocardiography Training Program: Team-Based Learning for Early-Stage Intensive Care Unit Nurses.心电图培训计划的效果:以团队为基础的学习对早期重症监护病房护士的影响。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020 Apr 1;51(4):174-180. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20200317-07.
6
A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education.一项系统综述,分析影响健康科学教育中电子学习的因素——促进因素和障碍。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6.
7
Registered Nurses' Knowledge of and Experience with Health Literacy.注册护士对健康素养的了解与经验
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Dec 5;3(4):e268-e279. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20191021-01. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Effects of pressure ulcer prevention training among nurses in long-term care hospitals.长期护理医院护士压疮预防培训的效果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104225. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104225. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
A Survey Study Evaluating and Comparing the Health Literacy Knowledge and Communication Skills Used by Nurses and Physicians.一项评估和比较护士与医生所使用的健康素养知识及沟通技巧的调查研究。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019865831. doi: 10.1177/0046958019865831.
10
Call for action: Nurses must play a critical role to enhance health literacy.行动呼吁:护士必须在提高健康素养方面发挥关键作用。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 27.