• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第 2 届欧洲颈动脉手术试验(ECST-2):一项随机临床试验的原理和方案,比较了有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄、低至中度卒中风险的患者中即刻血运重建与单纯优化药物治疗的效果。

The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke.

机构信息

Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06429-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06429-z
PMID:35897114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.

METHODS

Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.

DISCUSSION

ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012.

摘要

背景

根据三十年前进行的随机试验,目前建议对近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%的患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术。颈动脉斑块溃疡、年龄和相关合并症等多种因素可能会影响颈动脉血运重建的风险效益比。以前的试验中开发的一种模型可以根据这些特征计算未来的中风风险,从而将患者分为低风险、中风险或高风险。自最初的试验以来,医学治疗有了显著的改善。我们的假设是,对于伴有低至中度中风风险的颈动脉狭窄≥50%的患者,当接受最佳药物治疗时,颈动脉再血运重建不会带来额外获益。我们还假设,使用颈动脉斑块磁共振成像(MRI)的结果可以改善个体颈动脉狭窄患者未来中风风险的预测。

方法

将适合的患者随机分为立即血运重建加 OMT 与单独 OMT。适合的患者为无症状或有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%,估计 5 年中风风险<20%,使用颈动脉动脉风险评分(Carotid Artery Risk score)计算。在基线和随访期间进行脑 MRI 检查,作为盲法测量指标,以评估无症状性梗死和出血的发生率,而基线颈动脉斑块 MRI 将用于研究斑块特征是否决定未来中风风险,并帮助确定将从血运重建中获益的亚组患者。在招募 320 例基线 MRI 和至少 2 年随访的患者后,将进行初始分析,为研究的继续或重新启动提供设计和样本量数据。该初始分析的主要终点是任何临床上有症状的中风、MRI 上新脑梗死、心肌梗死或围手术期死亡的 2 年联合发生率。

讨论

ECST-2 将提供新的数据,说明在通过个体化风险评估选择的未来中风风险处于低至中度的颈动脉狭窄患者中,单独使用现代最佳药物治疗与附加颈动脉血运重建的疗效。我们预计,基线脑和颈动脉斑块 MRI 的结果将提供数据,以改善颈动脉狭窄患者中风风险的预测和治疗效果。

试验注册

ISRCTN 注册处 ISRCTN88147606。于 2012 年 7 月 5 日注册。

相似文献

1
The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke.第 2 届欧洲颈动脉手术试验(ECST-2):一项随机临床试验的原理和方案,比较了有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄、低至中度卒中风险的患者中即刻血运重建与单纯优化药物治疗的效果。
Trials. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06429-z.
2
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
3
Contralateral Stenosis and Echolucent Plaque Morphology are Associated with Elevated Stroke Risk in Patients Treated with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis within a Controlled Clinical Trial (SPACE-2).在一项对照临床试验(SPACE-2)中,接受无症状颈动脉狭窄治疗的患者,对侧狭窄和回声不均匀斑块形态与升高的卒中风险相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105940. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105940. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较(国际颈动脉支架研究):一项随机对照试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
5
International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.国际颈动脉支架置入术研究:一项比较有症状颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的随机临床试验方案。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(1):69-74. doi: 10.1159/000078753. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
6
The Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): an ongoing randomised controlled trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke.无症状性颈动脉手术试验-2(ACST-2):一项正在进行的随机对照试验,比较颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(57):1-40. doi: 10.3310/hta21570.
7
Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:血运重建
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 May-Jun;59(6):591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 3.
8
Editor's Choice - Risk of Stroke before Revascularisation in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Pooled Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.编辑精选 - 症状性颈动脉狭窄患者血管重建术前的卒中风险:随机对照试验的汇总分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):881-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
Effect of white-matter lesions on the risk of periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised trial.白质病变对颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期卒中风险的影响:来自随机试验的预设数据分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Sep;12(9):866-872. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70135-2. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS).症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入或内膜切除术治疗后 MRI 新出现的缺血性脑损伤:国际颈动脉支架研究(ICSS)的一个亚研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and Treatment of Carotid Stenosis: Overview of Therapeutic Possibilities and Comparison Between Interventional Radiology, Surgery and Hybrid Procedure.颈动脉狭窄的管理与治疗:治疗选择概述及介入放射学、外科手术与杂交手术的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1679. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131679.
2
Decreased circulating microRNA-22 expression as a potential biomarker for predicting a higher risk of recurrent ischemic stroke related to inner carotid artery stenosis: a multicenter study.循环中微小RNA-22表达降低作为预测与颈内动脉狭窄相关的复发性缺血性卒中高风险的潜在生物标志物:一项多中心研究
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03112-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Secular Trends in Procedural Stroke or Death Risks of Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与内膜切除术的操作相关卒中或死亡风险的长期变化趋势。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007870. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Prediction of Stroke Risk by Detection of Hemorrhage in Carotid Plaques: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.基于颈动脉斑块出血检测预测卒中风险:个体患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;13(2 Pt 1):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications.
Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization.
经颈动脉血运重建时代的患者决策。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):125-135.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Quantifying Carotid Stenosis: History, Current Applications, Limitations, and Potential: How Imaging Is Changing the Scenario.量化颈动脉狭窄:历史、当前应用、局限性及潜力:影像学如何改变现状
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 1;14(1):73. doi: 10.3390/life14010073.
5
When Will We Have What We Need to Advise Patients How to Manage Their Carotid Stenosis?: Lessons From SPACE-2.当我们有足够的信息来建议患者如何管理其颈动脉狭窄时,我们将会怎么做?:来自 SPACE-2 的经验教训。
Stroke. 2023 May;54(5):1452-1456. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.042172. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
易损颈动脉斑块的影像学生物标志物用于卒中风险预测及其潜在临床意义。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):559-572. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30035-3. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
Contemporary prevalence of carotid stenosis in patients presenting with ischaemic stroke.当代缺血性脑卒中患者颈动脉狭窄的流行情况。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):872-878. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11136. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管成形术与内膜切除术对比最佳药物治疗:SPACE-2研究的一年中期结果
Int J Stroke. 2019 Mar 15;15(6):1747493019833017. doi: 10.1177/1747493019833017.
6
Five-Year Risk of Stroke after TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作或小面积缺血性脑卒中后 5 年内的脑卒中风险。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 7;378(23):2182-2190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802712. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Carotid Artery Wall Imaging: Perspective and Guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology.颈动脉壁成像:来自 ASNR 血管壁成像研究组的观点和指南以及美国神经放射学会的专家共识建议。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):E9-E31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5488. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
8
Contemporary medical therapies of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease.动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病的当代医学疗法。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):8-16. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Optimal Medical Management Reduces Risk of Disease Progression and Ischemic Events in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Patients: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.最佳医学管理降低无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者疾病进展和缺血性事件风险:一项长期随访研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(3-4):150-159. doi: 10.1159/000477501. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
10
CREST-2: Identifying the Best Method of Stroke Prevention for Carotid Artery Stenosis: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Organizational Update.CREST-2:确定颈动脉狭窄最佳卒中预防方法:美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所组织更新
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):e130-e131. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016051. Epub 2017 Apr 6.