• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对修复土壤中产出的大米的支付意愿:来自公众对可持续土壤污染治理的潜力。

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.

机构信息

School of Public Affairs and China Academy of Rural Development (CARD), Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, 403 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158946.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19158946
PMID:35897316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331062/
Abstract

Remediation of polluted soil on arable land is mostly funded by governments, with the understanding that the public's willingness to pay for food produced on remediated soil can help establish a soil remediation model with more stakeholders. In contrast to previous studies that have focused on soil-remediation technologies' diffusion, this study employs choice experiments to evaluate market preferences for crops grown from lands of varying quality that are reflected in consumers' willingness to pay (WTP). The results show that consumers are willing to pay a small premium for rice labeled with remediated-soil claims, but the WTP for remediated-soil claim is less than that of an uncontaminated-soil claim. Consumers' WTP for remediated-soil claim increases by 29.03% when combining with a well-known brand, and it increases by 71.17% when information is provided about the efficacy of cadmium and heavy-metal-pollution remediation; however, combining with the region-of-origin label does not increase WTP. We also find that, in early stages of promotion, online stores may reach target consumers more easily. Based on these results, we propose four implications for policymakers.

摘要

耕地污染土壤修复主要由政府出资,因为公众愿意为修复土壤上生产的食物买单,这有助于建立一个有更多利益相关者参与的土壤修复模式。与以往关注土壤修复技术扩散的研究不同,本研究采用选择实验来评估消费者对不同质量土地上种植的作物的市场偏好,这些偏好反映在消费者的支付意愿(WTP)中。结果表明,消费者愿意为贴有修复土壤标签的大米支付少量溢价,但对修复土壤标签的 WTP 低于对无污染土壤标签的 WTP。当与知名品牌结合时,消费者对修复土壤标签的 WTP 增加了 29.03%,当提供关于镉和重金属污染修复效果的信息时,WTP 增加了 71.17%;然而,与产地标签结合并不会增加 WTP。我们还发现,在推广的早期阶段,在线商店可能更容易接触到目标消费者。基于这些结果,我们为政策制定者提出了四条建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/b2dca3a5d43e/ijerph-19-08946-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/c329fe2bbb6a/ijerph-19-08946-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/dca327ef13f9/ijerph-19-08946-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/8848e8f2037f/ijerph-19-08946-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/690dc39b020c/ijerph-19-08946-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/b2dca3a5d43e/ijerph-19-08946-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/c329fe2bbb6a/ijerph-19-08946-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/dca327ef13f9/ijerph-19-08946-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/8848e8f2037f/ijerph-19-08946-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/690dc39b020c/ijerph-19-08946-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/9331062/b2dca3a5d43e/ijerph-19-08946-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.消费者对修复土壤中产出的大米的支付意愿:来自公众对可持续土壤污染治理的潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158946.
2
Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.消费者为对抗肥胖流行的营养声明支付意愿:以西班牙低脂低盐奶酪为例
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.消费者对使用微生物应用生产的植物性食品的支付意愿,以替代合成化学投入。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488. eCollection 2021.
4
Revisiting GMOs: Are There Differences in European Consumers' Acceptance and Valuation for Cisgenically vs Transgenically Bred Rice?重新审视转基因生物:欧洲消费者对顺式基因培育水稻和转基因培育水稻的接受度及估值是否存在差异?
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0126060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126060. eCollection 2015.
5
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.消费者对带有健康和环境标签的鱼类产品的偏好和支付意愿:来自五个欧洲国家的证据。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2650. doi: 10.3390/nu12092650.
6
Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese's public willingness to pay a price premium for green products.公众愿意为绿色产品买单吗?基于对影响中国公众对绿色产品支付意愿的因素的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61408-61422. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14885-4. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
The Effects of Nutrition and Health Claim Information on Consumers' Sensory Preferences and Willingness to Pay.营养与健康声明信息对消费者感官偏好及支付意愿的影响
Foods. 2022 Nov 1;11(21):3460. doi: 10.3390/foods11213460.
8
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.消费者对可持续食品支付意愿的元分析
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105239. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Rice Attributes in China: Results of a Choice Experiment.中国消费者对大米属性的偏好及支付意愿:选择实验结果
Foods. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):2774. doi: 10.3390/foods13172774.
10
Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter?中国消费者对预制植物基肉类产品的评价:环境信息重要吗?
J Food Sci. 2024 Sep;89(9):5823-5840. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17279. Epub 2024 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Niche markets for sustainable agri-food systems: A systematic review.可持续农业食品系统的利基市场:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 29;11(3):e42346. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42346. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Can Product Information Steer towards Sustainable and Healthy Food Choices? A Pilot Study in an Online Supermarket.产品信息能否引导人们做出可持续和健康的食物选择?一项在线超市的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031107.
2
Heterogeneous public preferences for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution based on a choice experiment.基于选择实验的农业非点源污染控制的异质公众偏好。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Mar 1;305:114413. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114413. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
Potential driving forces and probabilistic health risks of heavy metal accumulation in the soils from an e-waste area, southeast China.
中国东南部电子废物区土壤中重金属积累的潜在驱动力和概率健康风险。
Chemosphere. 2022 Feb;289:133182. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133182. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
Valuing improved water services and negative environmental externalities from seawater desalination technology: A choice experiment from the Galápagos.重视海水淡化技术带来的改善的供水服务和负环境外部性:来自加拉帕戈斯群岛的选择实验。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114204. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114204. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Heavy metal(loid)s contamination and health risk assessment of soil-rice system in rural and peri-urban areas of lower brahmaputra valley, northeast India.印度东北部下布拉马普特拉河谷农村和城郊地区土壤-水稻系统的重金属(类)污染及健康风险评估。
Chemosphere. 2021 Mar;266:129150. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129150. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers' pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level.土壤污染风险感知如何影响农民的环保行为?收入水平的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110806. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
7
Sustainable remediation through the risk management perspective and stakeholder involvement: A systematic and bibliometric view of the literature.从风险管理视角和利益相关者参与的角度看可持续修复:对文献的系统和文献计量学研究。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Dec;255(Pt 1):113221. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113221. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Reclaimed water and food production: Cautionary tales from consumer research.再生水与粮食生产:消费者研究的警示故事。
Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.051. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Health risk assessment of Chinese consumers to Cadmium via dietary intake.中国消费者通过饮食摄入镉的健康风险评估。
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2017 Dec;44:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
10
Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Vegetable Species Planted in Contaminated Soils and the Health Risk Assessment.重金属在污染土壤中种植的蔬菜品种中的积累及健康风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 4;13(3):289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030289.