• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对使用微生物应用生产的植物性食品的支付意愿,以替代合成化学投入。

Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.

机构信息

Business Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260488
PMID:34874958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8651115/
Abstract

Analysis of consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for sustainable foods produced using new agri-food technologies is required to enhance the uptake of innovations that accelerate the transition towards sustainable food systems. Consumers' willingness to buy new food products, with no or limited consumption experience, mainly depends on their food choice motivational orientations (promotion- vs prevention-orientation). The objective of this study was to elicit consumers' WTP for foods that are produced with microbial applications during the plant production phase with the aim to reduce the use of synthetic chemicals in crop farming, as well as to understand the associations of food choice motives, personal and socio-demographic factors with the WTP. We used contingent valuation to elicit consumers' WTP for three food products (wheat bread, consumer potatoes and tomato sauce) through online surveys. Data were collected from 291 consumers, primarily from Italy, Germany and the Netherlands. Descriptive statistics, latent variable modelling and logistic regression were used to analysis data. Results show that more than two-third of the respondents are willing to pay premiums of at least 0.11 euro per kg of food products for reductions in synthetic chemical use by at least 50% due to microbial applications. The amount of WTP increases with the level of reductions in synthetic chemical use. The majority of the respondents are promotion-oriented consumers in relation to their food involvement, and are more likely to pay premiums for the sustainably produced food products. Environmentally concerned consumers are also more likely to pay premiums, whereas health concerned consumers are not. This study contributes to understanding of consumers' attitude and perceived health risks towards foods obtained using microbial applications, and the heterogeneity of their preferences. Results provide insights for identifying potential buyers of foods produced using microbial applications, and to set prices according to the levels of consumers' WTP.

摘要

分析消费者对使用新农业食品技术生产的可持续食品的偏好和支付意愿(WTP),对于加快向可持续食品系统转型的创新的采用至关重要。消费者购买没有或有限消费经验的新产品的意愿主要取决于他们的食物选择动机取向(促进导向与预防导向)。本研究旨在通过在线调查,从意大利、德国和荷兰的 291 名消费者中,了解消费者对使用微生物应用于植物生产阶段生产的食品的 WTP,目的是减少农作物种植中合成化学品的使用,并理解食品选择动机、个人和社会人口因素与 WTP 的关联。我们使用条件价值评估法来 elicite 消费者对三种食品(小麦面包、消费者土豆和番茄酱)的 WTP。描述性统计、潜在变量建模和逻辑回归用于分析数据。结果表明,超过三分之二的受访者愿意为至少减少 50%的合成化学品使用支付至少 0.11 欧元/公斤的食品溢价,因为这些食品是通过微生物应用生产的。WTP 的金额随着合成化学品使用减少水平的增加而增加。大多数受访者在与食物相关的方面都是促进导向的消费者,并且更愿意为可持续生产的食品支付溢价。关注环境的消费者也更有可能支付溢价,而关注健康的消费者则不然。本研究有助于了解消费者对使用微生物应用获得的食品的态度和感知健康风险,以及他们偏好的异质性。结果为确定使用微生物应用生产的食品的潜在购买者提供了见解,并根据消费者 WTP 的水平来设定价格。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/2b84d31378e0/pone.0260488.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/492b922f5d06/pone.0260488.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/f4491a3f9683/pone.0260488.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/2b84d31378e0/pone.0260488.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/492b922f5d06/pone.0260488.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/f4491a3f9683/pone.0260488.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13cd/8651115/2b84d31378e0/pone.0260488.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.消费者对使用微生物应用生产的植物性食品的支付意愿,以替代合成化学投入。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488. eCollection 2021.
2
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.消费者对带有健康和环境标签的鱼类产品的偏好和支付意愿:来自五个欧洲国家的证据。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2650. doi: 10.3390/nu12092650.
3
Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter?中国消费者对预制植物基肉类产品的评价:环境信息重要吗?
J Food Sci. 2024 Sep;89(9):5823-5840. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17279. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
4
Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.消费者为对抗肥胖流行的营养声明支付意愿:以西班牙低脂低盐奶酪为例
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Willingness-to-Pay for Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.环境可持续性标签对食品支付意愿的影响:离散选择实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 31;13(8):2677. doi: 10.3390/nu13082677.
6
Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.中国城市消费者对低碳农产品支付意愿的影响因素及群体差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010358.
7
Role of information in consumers' preferences for eco-sustainable genetic improvements in plant breeding.信息在消费者对植物育种中生态可持续性遗传改良偏好中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255130. eCollection 2021.
8
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.消费者对可持续食品支付意愿的元分析
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105239. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Peer feedback can decrease consumers' willingness to pay for food: Evidence from a field experiment.同伴反馈会降低消费者对食品的支付意愿:来自现场实验的证据。
Appetite. 2022 Nov 1;178:106162. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106162. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
10
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.消费者对修复土壤中产出的大米的支付意愿:来自公众对可持续土壤污染治理的潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158946.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and factors associated with metabolic syndrome among ART Naïve people living with HIV in Accra, Ghana: a multicenter cross-sectional study.加纳阿克拉未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染者中代谢综合征的患病率及相关因素:一项多中心横断面研究
AIDS Res Ther. 2025 Aug 25;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12981-025-00783-z.
2
Consumers acceptance of new food ingredients from the food industry's by-products-a focus group study.消费者对食品工业副产品中新食品成分的接受度——一项焦点小组研究
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 19;12:1509833. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1509833. eCollection 2025.
3
The role of environmental attitudes and consumption patterns in consumers' preferences for sustainable food from circular farming system: a six EU case studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review.可持续饮食维度。比较消费者对营养、环境和社会责任食品标签的偏好:一项系统综述。
Sustainability. 2019 Nov 21;11(23):6575. doi: 10.3390/su11236575.
2
Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies.消费者对新型食品技术的接受度。
Nat Food. 2020 Jun;1(6):343-350. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
Microbiome innovations for a sustainable future.微生物组创新助力可持续未来。
环境态度和消费模式在消费者对循环农业系统可持续食品偏好中的作用:六个欧盟案例研究
Agric Food Econ. 2025;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40100-025-00350-0. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Determinants of Consumers' Acceptance and Adoption of Novel Food in View of More Resilient and Sustainable Food Systems in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review.鉴于欧盟更具韧性和可持续性的食品系统,消费者对新型食品的接受和采用的决定因素:一项系统文献综述
Foods. 2024 May 15;13(10):1534. doi: 10.3390/foods13101534.
5
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Salt stress alleviators to improve crop productivity for sustainable agriculture development.促进植物生长的根际细菌:缓解盐胁迫以提高作物生产力,促进可持续农业发展。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 12;13:1101862. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1101862. eCollection 2022.
6
Plant-Based Innovations for the Transition to Sustainability: A Bibliometric and in-Depth Content Analysis.向可持续发展转型的植物基创新:文献计量与深入内容分析
Foods. 2022 Oct 9;11(19):3137. doi: 10.3390/foods11193137.
Nat Microbiol. 2021 Feb;6(2):138-142. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00857-w.
4
Crop microbiome and sustainable agriculture.作物微生物组与可持续农业。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Nov;18(11):601-602. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00446-y.
5
Does Soil Contribute to the Human Gut Microbiome?土壤对人类肠道微生物群有影响吗?
Microorganisms. 2019 Aug 23;7(9):287. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090287.
6
Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world.植物益生菌:养活世界的解决方案。
AIMS Microbiol. 2017 Jun 21;3(3):502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502. eCollection 2017.
7
Plant probiotic bacteria enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops.植物益生菌可提高水果和园艺作物的品质。
AIMS Microbiol. 2017 Jun 19;3(3):483-501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.483. eCollection 2017.
8
Perspectives of Microbial Inoculation for Sustainable Development and Environmental Management.微生物接种促进可持续发展与环境管理的展望
Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 5;9:2992. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02992. eCollection 2018.
9
Microbial Consortia: Promising Probiotics as Plant Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture.微生物群落:有望成为可持续农业中植物生物刺激剂的益生菌
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 4;9:1801. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01801. eCollection 2018.
10
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.在环境限度内保持食物系统的选择。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.