Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Antonio Nariño University, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9051. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159051.
During the 2015-2016 Zika Virus (ZIKV) epidemic in Brazil, the geographical distributions of ZIKV infection and microcephaly outbreaks did not align. This raised doubts about the virus as the single cause of the microcephaly outbreak and led to research hypotheses of alternative explanatory factors, such as environmental variables and factors, agrochemical use, or immunizations. We investigated context and the intermediate and structural determinants of health inequalities, as well as social environment factors, to determine their interaction with ZIKV-positive- and ZIKV-negative-related microcephaly. The results revealed the identification of 382 associations among 382 nonredundant variables of Zika surveillance, including multiple determinants of environmental public health factors and variables obtained from 5565 municipalities in Brazil. This study compared those factors and variables directly associated with microcephaly incidence positive to ZIKV and those associated with microcephaly incidence negative to ZIKV, respectively, and mapped them in case and control subnetworks. The subnetworks of factors and variables associated with low birth weight and birthweight where birth incidence served as an additional control were also mapped. Non-significant differences in factors and variables were observed, as were weights of associations between microcephaly incidence, both positive and negative to ZIKV, which revealed diagnostic inaccuracies that translated to the underestimation of the scope of the ZIKV outbreak. A detailed analysis of the patterns of association does not support a finding that vaccinations contributed to microcephaly, but it does raise concerns about the use of agrochemicals as a potential factor in the observed neurotoxicity arising from the presence of heavy metals in the environment and microcephaly not associated with ZIKV. Summary: A comparative network inferential analysis of the patterns of variables and factors associated with Zika virus infections in Brazil during 2015-2016 coinciding with a microcephaly epidemic identified multiple contributing determinants. This study advances our understanding of the cumulative interactive effects of exposures to chemical and non-chemical stressors in the built, natural, physical, and social environments on adverse pregnancy and health outcomes in vulnerable populations.
在 2015 年至 2016 年巴西寨卡病毒(ZIKV)流行期间,ZIKV 感染和小头畸形暴发的地理分布并不一致。这让人怀疑该病毒是否是小头畸形暴发的单一原因,并导致了替代解释因素的研究假设,如环境变量和因素、农用化学品使用或免疫接种。我们研究了健康不平等的背景以及中间和结构决定因素,以及社会环境因素,以确定它们与寨卡病毒阳性和寨卡病毒阴性相关的小头畸形之间的相互作用。研究结果揭示了在寨卡病毒监测的 382 个非冗余变量中识别出 382 种关联,包括环境公共卫生因素的多个决定因素和从巴西 5565 个城市获得的变量。本研究比较了那些与寨卡病毒阳性相关的小头畸形发病率直接相关的因素和变量,以及与寨卡病毒阴性相关的小头畸形发病率相关的因素和变量,并分别将它们映射到病例和对照子网中。还绘制了与低出生体重和出生体重相关的因素和变量子网,其中出生发病率作为附加对照。观察到因素和变量之间没有显著差异,寨卡病毒阳性和阴性相关的小头畸形发病率之间的关联权重也没有差异,这表明诊断不准确,从而低估了寨卡病毒暴发的范围。对关联模式的详细分析不支持疫苗接种导致小头畸形的说法,但它确实让人对农用化学品的使用表示关注,因为农用化学品可能是环境中重金属引起的神经毒性和与寨卡病毒无关的小头畸形的一个潜在因素。总结:在 2015 年至 2016 年巴西寨卡病毒感染期间,同时发生小头畸形流行,对与寨卡病毒感染相关的变量和因素模式进行比较网络推理分析,确定了多个促成因素。本研究增进了我们对化学和非化学应激源在建筑、自然、物理和社会环境中对弱势人群不良妊娠和健康结果的累积交互影响的理解。