Suppr超能文献

基于镇痛伤害指数预测手术中专家疼痛评分的深度学习算法比较。

Comparison of Deep Learning Algorithms in Predicting Expert Assessments of Pain Scores during Surgical Operations Using Analgesia Nociception Index.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao District, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 23;22(15):5496. doi: 10.3390/s22155496.

Abstract

There are many surgical operations performed daily in operation rooms worldwide. Adequate anesthesia is needed during an operation. Besides hypnosis, adequate analgesia is critical to prevent autonomic reactions. Clinical experience and vital signs are usually used to adjust the dosage of analgesics. Analgesia nociception index (ANI), which ranges from 0 to 100, is derived from heart rate variability (HRV) via electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, for pain evaluation in a non-invasive manner. It represents parasympathetic activity. In this study, we compared the performance of multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms in predicting expert assessment of pain score (EAPS) based on patient's HRV during surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze how deep learning models differed from the medical doctors' predictions of EAPS. As the input and output features of the deep learning models, the opposites of ANI and EAPS were used. This study included 80 patients who underwent operations at National Taiwan University Hospital. Using MLP and LSTM, a holdout method was first applied to 60 training patients, 10 validation patients, and 10 testing patients. As compared to the LSTM model, which had a testing mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.633 ± 0.542, the MLP model had a testing MAE of 2.490 ± 0.522, with a more appropriate shape of its prediction curves. The model based on MLP was selected as the best. Using MLP, a seven-fold cross validation method was then applied. The first fold had the lowest testing MAE of 2.460 ± 0.634, while the overall MAE for the seven-fold cross validation method was 2.848 ± 0.308. In conclusion, HRV analysis using MLP algorithm had a good correlation with EAPS; therefore, it can play role as a continuous monitor to predict intraoperative pain levels, to assist physicians in adjusting analgesic agent dosage. Further studies may consider obtaining more input features, such as photoplethysmography (PPG) and other kinds of continuous variable, to improve the prediction performance.

摘要

全球每天都有许多手术在手术室中进行。手术过程中需要足够的麻醉。除了催眠,充分的镇痛对于防止自主反应至关重要。临床经验和生命体征通常用于调整镇痛药的剂量。镇痛伤害感知指数 (ANI) 通过心电图 (ECG) 信号从心率变异性 (HRV) 中得出,用于非侵入性疼痛评估。它代表副交感神经活动。在这项研究中,我们比较了多层感知机 (MLP) 和长短期记忆 (LSTM) 算法在预测手术过程中患者 HRV 基础上的专家疼痛评分 (EAPS) 的性能。本研究的目的是分析深度学习模型与医生预测 EAPS 的差异。作为深度学习模型的输入和输出特征,使用了 ANI 和 EAPS 的相反数。这项研究包括在国立台湾大学医院接受手术的 80 名患者。使用 MLP 和 LSTM,首先采用预留法对 60 名训练患者、10 名验证患者和 10 名测试患者进行分析。与 LSTM 模型相比,LSTM 模型的测试平均绝对误差 (MAE) 为 2.633 ± 0.542,MLP 模型的测试 MAE 为 2.490 ± 0.522,其预测曲线的形状更合适。选择基于 MLP 的模型作为最佳模型。然后使用 MLP 进行七重交叉验证法。第一折的测试 MAE 最低,为 2.460 ± 0.634,而七重交叉验证法的总 MAE 为 2.848 ± 0.308。总之,使用 MLP 算法对 HRV 进行分析与 EAPS 有很好的相关性;因此,它可以作为连续监测器,预测术中疼痛水平,协助医生调整镇痛药物剂量。进一步的研究可以考虑获得更多的输入特征,如光电容积脉搏波 (PPG) 和其他类型的连续变量,以提高预测性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4a/9330343/7369fdeb5025/sensors-22-05496-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验