• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于激光雷达道路横断面图像的道路沿线特征自动检测。

Automatic Roadside Feature Detection Based on Lidar Road Cross Section Images.

机构信息

Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Transport Planning, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, Vukelićeva 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 23;22(15):5510. doi: 10.3390/s22155510.

DOI:10.3390/s22155510
PMID:35898014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331113/
Abstract

The United Nations (UN) stated that all new roads and 75% of travel time on roads must be 3+ star standard by 2030. The number of stars is determined by the International Road Assessment Program (iRAP) star rating module. It is based on 64 attributes for each road. In this paper, a framework for highly accurate and fully automatic determination of two attributes is proposed: roadside severity-object and roadside severity-distance. The framework integrates mobile Lidar point clouds with deep learning-based object detection on road cross-section images. The You Only Look Once (YOLO) network was used for object detection. Lidar data were collected by vehicle-mounted mobile Lidar for all Croatian highways. Point clouds were collected in .las format and cropped to 10 m-long segments align vehicle path. To determine both attributes, it was necessary to detect the road with high accuracy, then roadside severity-distance was determined with respect to the edge of the detected road. Each segment is finally classified into one of 13 roadside severity object classes and one of four roadside severity-distance classes. The overall accuracy of the roadside severity-object classification is 85.1%, while for the distance attribute it is 85.6%. The best average precision is achieved for safety barrier concrete class (0.98), while the worst AP is achieved for rockface class (0.72).

摘要

联合国(UN)表示,到 2030 年,所有新道路和 75%的道路行驶时间必须达到 3+星级标准。星级数量由国际道路评估计划(iRAP)星级评定模块确定。它基于每条道路的 64 个属性。本文提出了一种用于高度准确和全自动确定两个属性的框架:路边严重程度-对象和路边严重程度-距离。该框架将移动激光雷达点云和基于深度学习的道路横断面图像中的目标检测相结合。使用 You Only Look Once(YOLO)网络进行目标检测。激光雷达数据由车载移动激光雷达在所有克罗地亚高速公路上采集。点云以.las 格式采集,并裁剪成 10 米长的段,与车辆路径对齐。为了确定这两个属性,需要高精度地检测道路,然后根据检测到的道路边缘确定路边严重程度-距离。最后,每个路段被分类为 13 个路边严重程度对象类之一和 4 个路边严重程度距离类之一。路边严重程度对象分类的整体准确率为 85.1%,而距离属性的准确率为 85.6%。对于安全屏障混凝土类(0.98),最佳平均精度最高,而对于岩面类(0.72),AP 最差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/7fec6704102e/sensors-22-05510-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/841713a96fa2/sensors-22-05510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/9ff75dfb7319/sensors-22-05510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/4d9782376067/sensors-22-05510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/714ecfd3d9db/sensors-22-05510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/83e85de51bcb/sensors-22-05510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/d29fe6f653a3/sensors-22-05510-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/0fd29ce5e4ab/sensors-22-05510-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/816c09fe7878/sensors-22-05510-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/7fec6704102e/sensors-22-05510-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/841713a96fa2/sensors-22-05510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/9ff75dfb7319/sensors-22-05510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/4d9782376067/sensors-22-05510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/714ecfd3d9db/sensors-22-05510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/83e85de51bcb/sensors-22-05510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/d29fe6f653a3/sensors-22-05510-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/0fd29ce5e4ab/sensors-22-05510-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/816c09fe7878/sensors-22-05510-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/9331113/7fec6704102e/sensors-22-05510-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Automatic Roadside Feature Detection Based on Lidar Road Cross Section Images.基于激光雷达道路横断面图像的道路沿线特征自动检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 23;22(15):5510. doi: 10.3390/s22155510.
2
A novel method of vehicle-pedestrian near-crash identification with roadside LiDAR data.基于路侧激光雷达数据的车辆-行人近碰撞新型识别方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roadside LiDAR data.一种基于路边 LiDAR 数据的新型滑板者相关近撞识别方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105438. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105438. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
An improved vehicle-pedestrian near-crash identification method with a roadside LiDAR sensor.基于路侧激光雷达传感器的车辆行人近撞预警改进识别方法。
J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:211-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Topic analysis of Road safety inspections using latent dirichlet allocation: A case study of roadside safety in Irish main roads.基于潜在狄利克雷分配的道路安全检查主题分析:以爱尔兰主要道路路边安全为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:336-349. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Expansion of NASS/CDS for characterizing run-off-road crashes.用于表征冲出路外碰撞事故的国家汽车抽样系统/碰撞数据标准的扩展
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S118-S122. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1798942. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Object Detection Based on Roadside LiDAR for Cooperative Driving Automation: A Review.基于路侧激光雷达的协同驾驶自动化目标检测:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;22(23):9316. doi: 10.3390/s22239316.
8
Empirical calibration of a roadside hazardousness index for Spanish two-lane rural roads.西班牙双车道农村道路路边危险指数的实证校准。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2018-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.012.
9
Evaluating the safety risk of roadside features for rural two-lane roads using reliability analysis.运用可靠性分析评估农村双车道公路路边设施的安全风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
Characteristics of the road and surrounding environment in metropolitan shopping strips: association with the frequency and severity of single-vehicle crashes.大都市购物街道路及周边环境特征:与单车事故发生频率及严重程度的关联
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S74-80. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.930450.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Automated Road Infrastructure Safety Assessments.利用高分辨率卫星图像进行自动化道路基础设施安全评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;23(9):4405. doi: 10.3390/s23094405.
2
LiDAR Intensity Completion: Fully Exploiting the Message from LiDAR Sensors.激光雷达强度补全:充分利用激光雷达传感器的信息
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;22(19):7533. doi: 10.3390/s22197533.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep Learning for LiDAR Point Clouds in Autonomous Driving: A Review.自动驾驶中用于激光雷达点云的深度学习:综述
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021 Aug;32(8):3412-3432. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015992. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
2
A review of spatial approaches in road safety.道路安全空间方法综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Feb;135:105323. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105323. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Progress in reducing road-traffic injuries in the WHO European region.世界卫生组织欧洲区域在减少道路交通伤害方面取得的进展。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e272-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30074-X. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Low-Cost and Data Anonymised City Traffic Flow Data Collection to Support Intelligent Traffic System.低成本且数据匿名化的城市交通流数据采集,以支持智能交通系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 16;19(2):347. doi: 10.3390/s19020347.