Zhang Chen-Han, Ge Yi-Peng, Zhong Yong-Liang, Hu Hai-Ou, Qiao Zhi-Yu, Li Cheng-Nan, Zhu Jun-Ming
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 8;9:892696. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.892696. eCollection 2022.
Massive bleeding throughout aortic repair in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients is a common but severe condition that can cause multiple serious clinical problems. Here, we report our findings regarding risk factors, short-term outcomes, and predicting model for massive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair.
A universal definition of perioperative bleeding (UDPB) class 3 and 4 were used to define massive bleeding and comprehensively evaluate patients. A total of 402 consecutive patients were enrolled in this retrospective study during 2019. Surgical strategies used to perform aortic arch procedures included total arch and hemiarch replacements. In each criterion, patients with massive bleeding were compared with remaining patients. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for massive bleeding. Logistic regression was used to build the model, and the model was evaluated with its discrimination and calibration.
Independent risk factors for massive bleeding included male sex (OR = 6.493, < 0.001), elder patients (OR = 1.029, = 0.05), low body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.879, = 0.003), emergent surgery (OR = 3.112, = 0.016), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.012, = 0.002), lower hemoglobin levels (OR = 0.976, = 0.002), increased D-dimer levels (OR = 1.000, = 0.037), increased fibrin degradation products (OR = 1.019, = 0.008), hemiarch replacement (OR = 5.045, = 0.037), total arch replacement (OR = 14.405, = 0.004). The early-stage mortality was higher in massive bleeding group (15.9 vs. 3.9%, = 0.001). The predicting model showed a well discrimination (AUC = 0.817) and calibration (χ = 5.281, = 0.727 > 0.05).
Massive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair is highly associated with gender, emergent surgery, increased D-dimer levels, longer CPB time, anemia, and use of a complex surgical strategy. Since massive bleeding may lead to worse outcomes, surgeons should choose suitable surgical strategies in patients who are at a high risk of massive bleeding.
急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)患者在主动脉修复术中发生大出血是一种常见但严重的情况,可导致多种严重的临床问题。在此,我们报告了关于接受急诊主动脉修复的ATAAD患者大出血的危险因素、短期结局及预测模型的研究结果。
采用围手术期出血通用定义(UDPB)3级和4级来定义大出血,并对患者进行全面评估。2019年期间,共有402例连续患者纳入本回顾性研究。用于实施主动脉弓手术的手术策略包括全弓置换和半弓置换。在各项标准中,将发生大出血的患者与其余患者进行比较。采用多变量回归分析来确定大出血的独立危险因素。使用逻辑回归构建模型,并通过辨别力和校准对模型进行评估。
大出血的独立危险因素包括男性(OR = 6.493,P < 0.001)、老年患者(OR = 1.029,P = 0.05)、低体重指数(BMI)(OR = 0.879,P = 0.003)、急诊手术(OR = 3.112,P = 0.016)、体外循环时间延长(OR = 1.012,P = 0.002)、血红蛋白水平较低(OR = 0.976,P = 0.002)、D - 二聚体水平升高(OR = 1.000,P = 0.037)、纤维蛋白降解产物增加(OR = 1.019,P = 0.008)、半弓置换(OR = 5.045,P = 0.037)、全弓置换(OR = 14.405,P = 0.004)。大出血组的早期死亡率较高(15.9% vs. 3.9%,P = 0.001)。预测模型显示出良好的辨别力(AUC = 0.817)和校准(χ² = 5.281,P = 0.727 > 0.05)。
接受急诊主动脉修复的ATAAD患者发生大出血与性别、急诊手术、D - 二聚体水平升高、体外循环时间延长、贫血以及采用复杂手术策略高度相关。由于大出血可能导致更差的结局,外科医生应在大出血高危患者中选择合适的手术策略。