• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款用于身体活动的个性化移动应用程序:一项实验性混合方法研究。

A personalized mobile app for physical activity: An experimental mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Tong Huong Ly, Quiroz Juan C, Kocaballi Ahmet Baki, Ijaz Kiran, Coiera Enrico, Chow Clara K, Laranjo Liliana

机构信息

Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2022 Jul 21;8:20552076221115017. doi: 10.1177/20552076221115017. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076221115017
PMID:35898287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9309778/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of the be.well app and its personalization approach which regularly considers users' preferences, amongst university students.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods, pre-post experiment, where participants used the app for 2 months. Eligibility criteria included: age 18-34 years; owning an iPhone with Internet access; and fluency in English. Usability was assessed by a validated questionnaire; engagement metrics were reported. Changes in physical activity were assessed by comparing the difference in daily step count between baseline and 2 months. Interviews were conducted to assess acceptability; thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three participants were enrolled in the study (mean age = 21.9 years, 71.4% women). The mean usability score was 5.6 ± 0.8 out of 7. The median daily engagement time was 2 minutes. Eighteen out of 23 participants used the app in the last month of the study. Qualitative data revealed that people liked the personalized activity suggestion feature as it was actionable and promoted user autonomy. Some users also expressed privacy concerns if they had to provide a lot of personal data to receive highly personalized features. Daily step count increased after 2 months of the intervention (median difference = 1953 steps/day, -value <.001, 95% CI 782 to 3112).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating users' preferences in personalized advice provided by a physical activity app was considered feasible and acceptable, with preliminary support for its positive effects on daily step count. Future randomized studies with longer follow up are warranted to determine the effectiveness of personalized mobile apps in promoting physical activity.

摘要

目的

调查be.well应用程序及其定期考虑用户偏好的个性化方法在大学生中的可行性。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法的前后测实验,参与者使用该应用程序2个月。纳入标准包括:年龄18 - 34岁;拥有可上网的苹果手机;英语流利。通过一份经过验证的问卷评估可用性;报告参与指标。通过比较基线和2个月时每日步数的差异来评估身体活动的变化。进行访谈以评估可接受性;进行主题分析。

结果

23名参与者纳入研究(平均年龄 = 21.9岁,71.4%为女性)。可用性平均得分为7分中的5.6 ± 0.8分。每日参与时间中位数为2分钟。23名参与者中有18名在研究的最后一个月使用了该应用程序。定性数据显示,人们喜欢个性化活动建议功能,因为它具有可操作性并促进了用户自主性。一些用户也表达了如果必须提供大量个人数据以获得高度个性化功能时对隐私的担忧。干预2个月后每日步数增加(中位数差异 = 1953步/天,P值 <.001,95%置信区间782至3112)。

结论

将用户偏好纳入体育活动应用程序提供的个性化建议中被认为是可行且可接受的,初步支持其对每日步数有积极影响。未来需要进行更长随访期的随机研究,以确定个性化移动应用程序在促进体育活动方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/caa221496a7d/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/86d0d2ab6875/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/967b39ca579e/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/c4516b0556cd/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/caa221496a7d/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/86d0d2ab6875/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/967b39ca579e/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/c4516b0556cd/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c85d/9309778/caa221496a7d/10.1177_20552076221115017-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A personalized mobile app for physical activity: An experimental mixed-methods study.一款用于身体活动的个性化移动应用程序:一项实验性混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Jul 21;8:20552076221115017. doi: 10.1177/20552076221115017. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
A Mobile Social Networking App for Weight Management and Physical Activity Promotion: Results From an Experimental Mixed Methods Study.移动社交网络应用于体重管理和身体活动促进:一项实验性混合方法研究的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e19991. doi: 10.2196/19991.
3
Efficacy of a Mobile Social Networking Intervention in Promoting Physical Activity: Quasi-Experimental Study.移动社交网络干预促进身体活动的效果:准实验研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 28;7(3):e12181. doi: 10.2196/12181.
4
Using a Mobile Social Networking App to Promote Physical Activity: A Qualitative Study of Users' Perspectives.使用移动社交网络应用程序促进身体活动:用户观点的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 21;20(12):e11439. doi: 10.2196/11439.
5
Breast Cancer Survivors' Perspectives on Motivational and Personalization Strategies in Mobile App-Based Physical Activity Coaching Interventions: Qualitative Study.基于移动应用的身体活动教练干预中乳腺癌幸存者对动机和个性化策略的观点:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e18867. doi: 10.2196/18867.
6
The Assessment of a Personalized Nutrition Tool (eNutri) in Germany: Pilot Study on Usability Metrics and Users' Experiences.德国一种个性化营养工具(eNutri)的评估:可用性指标及用户体验的试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e34497. doi: 10.2196/34497.
7
Exploring Users' Experiences of the Uptake and Adoption of Physical Activity Apps: Longitudinal Qualitative Study.探索用户对体育活动应用程序的接受和采用的体验:纵向定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e11636. doi: 10.2196/11636.
8
Usability and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Preoperative mHealth App for People Undergoing Major Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.术前移动医疗应用程序在接受大手术人群中的可用性和初步有效性:试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 7;9(1):e23402. doi: 10.2196/23402.
9
Usability and Acceptability of an App (SELFBACK) to Support Self-Management of Low Back Pain: Mixed Methods Study.一款支持腰痛自我管理的应用程序(SELFBACK)的可用性和可接受性:混合方法研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Sep 9;7(2):e18729. doi: 10.2196/18729.
10
Adding team-based financial incentives to the Carrot Rewards physical activity app increases daily step count on a population scale: a 24-week matched case control study.在 Carrot Rewards 运动应用程序中加入基于团队的财务激励措施可以增加人群的日常步数:一项为期 24 周的匹配病例对照研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 19;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01043-1.

引用本文的文献

1
College Community-Based Physical Activity Support at a Public University During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Longitudinal Analysis of Intra- Versus Interpersonal Components for Uptake and Outcome Association.新冠疫情期间一所公立大学基于学院社区的体育活动支持:对参与和结果关联的人际与个人组成部分的回顾性纵向分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 16;13:e51707. doi: 10.2196/51707.
2
User Experience With a Personalized mHealth Service for Physical Activity Promotion in University Students: Mixed Methods Study.大学生身体活动促进个性化移动健康服务的用户体验:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 28;9:e64384. doi: 10.2196/64384.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.移动健康与隐私:横断面研究
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1248.
2
Artificial intelligence decision-making in mobile health.移动健康中的人工智能决策
Biochem (Lond). 2019 Oct;41(5):20-24. doi: 10.1042/bio04105020. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.个性化移动技术在生活方式行为改变中的应用:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
MoodMover: Development and usability testing of an mHealth physical activity intervention for depression.
情绪推动者:一种用于抑郁症的移动健康身体活动干预措施的开发与可用性测试
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 3;11:20552076251317756. doi: 10.1177/20552076251317756. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Opening the digital front door for individuals using long-term in-home ventilation (LIVE) during a pandemic- implementation, feasibility and acceptability.在大流行期间为长期居家使用通气设备(LIVE)的个体打开数字前门——实施、可行性和可接受性
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;9:20552076231213447. doi: 10.1177/20552076231213447. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
"You get what you need when you need it": A mixed methods examination of the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored digital tool to promote physical activity among women in midlife.“在需要时获取所需之物”:一项关于定制数字工具促进中年女性身体活动的可行性和可接受性的混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 9;9:20552076231210654. doi: 10.1177/20552076231210654. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106532. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106532. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression.智能手机应用程序和活动追踪器能否提高成年人的身体活动量?系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;55(8):422-432. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
A Mobile Social Networking App for Weight Management and Physical Activity Promotion: Results From an Experimental Mixed Methods Study.移动社交网络应用于体重管理和身体活动促进:一项实验性混合方法研究的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e19991. doi: 10.2196/19991.
6
A Smartphone-Based Technique to Detect Dynamic User Preferences for Tailoring Behavioral Interventions: Observational Utility Study of Ecological Daily Needs Assessment.一种基于智能手机的技术,用于检测用户对行为干预措施的动态偏好定制:生态日常需求评估的观察效用研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 13;8(11):e18609. doi: 10.2196/18609.
7
Worldwide Effect of COVID-19 on Physical Activity: A Descriptive Study.新冠病毒病对身体活动的全球影响:一项描述性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):767-770. doi: 10.7326/M20-2665. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Social Comparison Features in Physical Activity Promotion Apps: Scoping Meta-Review.体育活动促进类应用程序中的社会比较特征:范围性元综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 27;22(3):e15642. doi: 10.2196/15642.
9
Privacy Gaps for Digital Cardiology Data: Big Problems With Big Data.数字心脏病学数据的隐私空白:大数据的大问题。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 25;141(8):613-615. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044966. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Personalised eHealth interventions in adults with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.成人超重和肥胖的个性化电子健康干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2020 Mar;132:106001. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106001. Epub 2020 Jan 25.