Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada.
Ivey Business School, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 19;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01043-1.
Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) targeting physical inactivity have increased in popularity yet are usually limited by low engagement. This study examined the impact of adding team-based incentives (Step Together Challenges, STCs) to an existing mHealth app (Carrot Rewards) that rewarded individual physical activity achievements.
A 24-week quasi-experimental study (retrospective matched pairs design) was conducted in three Canadian provinces (pre-intervention: weeks 1-12; intervention: weeks 13-24). Participants who used Carrot Rewards and STCs (experimental group) were matched with those who used Carrot Rewards only (controls) on age, gender, province and baseline mean daily step count (±500 steps/d). Carrot Rewards users earned individual-level incentives (worth $0.04 CAD) each day they reached a personalized daily step goal. With a single partner, STC users could earn team incentives ($0.40 CAD) for collaboratively reaching individual daily step goals 10 times in seven days (e.g., Partner A completes four goals and Partner B completes six goals in a week).
The main analysis included 61,170 users (mean age = 32 yrs.; % female = 64). Controlling for pre-intervention mean daily step count, a significant difference in intervention mean daily step count favoured the experimental group (p < 0.0001; η = 0.024). The estimated marginal mean group difference was 537 steps per day, or 3759 steps per week (about 40 walking min/wk). Linear regression suggested a dose-response relationship between the number of STCs completed (app engagement) and intervention mean daily step count (adjusted R = 0.699) with each new STC corresponding to approximately 200 more steps per day.
Despite an explosion of physical activity app interest, low engagement leading to small or no effects remains an industry hallmark. In this paper, we found that adding modest team-based incentives to the Carrot Rewards app increased mean daily step count, and importantly, app engagement moderated this effect. Others should consider novel small-teams based approaches to boost engagement and effects.
针对身体活动不足的移动健康应用(mHealth 应用)越来越受欢迎,但通常参与度较低。本研究旨在探讨在现有奖励个人身体活动成就的 mHealth 应用(胡萝卜奖励)中添加基于团队的激励措施(一起行动挑战,STC)对其的影响。
在加拿大三个省份进行了一项为期 24 周的准实验研究(回顾性匹配对设计)(干预前:第 1-12 周;干预:第 13-24 周)。使用胡萝卜奖励和 STC 的参与者(实验组)与仅使用胡萝卜奖励的参与者(对照组)按照年龄、性别、省份和基线平均每日步数(±500 步/天)进行匹配。每天达到个性化每日目标步数,胡萝卜奖励用户即可获得个人层面的奖励(价值 0.04 加元)。与单个伴侣合作,STC 用户可以在七天内十次共同达到个人每日目标步数(例如,伴侣 A 完成四个目标,伴侣 B 完成六个目标)来获得团队奖励(0.40 加元)。
主要分析纳入了 61170 名用户(平均年龄 32 岁;女性占 64%)。控制干预前平均每日步数,实验组干预后平均每日步数有显著差异(p<0.0001;η=0.024)。估计边际平均组间差异为每天 537 步,每周 3759 步(约 40 分钟步行/周)。线性回归表明,完成的 STC 数量(应用参与度)与干预后平均每日步数之间存在剂量反应关系(调整后的 R=0.699),每完成一个新的 STC,每天大约增加 200 多步。
尽管人们对身体活动应用的兴趣大增,但低参与度导致效果甚微或没有效果仍然是该行业的特点。在本文中,我们发现,在胡萝卜奖励应用中添加适度的基于团队的激励措施可以提高平均每日步数,重要的是,应用参与度调节了这种效果。其他人应该考虑采用新颖的小规模团队方法来提高参与度和效果。