Suppr超能文献

转基因大豆事件40-3-2插入位点的新型生物信息学评估的风险评估

Risk assessment of a new bioinformatics evaluation of the insertion sites of genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.

作者信息

Mullins Ewen, Bresson Jean-Louis, Dalmay Tamas, Dewhurst Ian Crawford, Epstein Michelle M, Firbank Leslie George, Guerche Philippe, Hejatko Jan, Moreno Francisco Javier, Naegeli Hanspeter, Nogué Fabien, Rostoks Nils, Sánchez Serrano Jose Juan, Savoini Giovanni, Veromann Eve, Veronesi Fabio, Goumperis Tilemachos, Raffaello Tommaso

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Jul 22;20(7):e07412. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7412. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) soybean 40-3-2 expresses a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase protein from sp. strain CP4 (CP4 EPSPS), which confers tolerance to glyphosate. This event was previously assessed by the GMO Panel as a single event and as part of a two-event stack and was found to be as safe as its conventional counterparts and other appropriate comparators with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. On September 2021, the European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate a new bioinformatics study which revealed predicted genomic deletions at the insertion sites using the available soybean reference genome. Considering the variability of the soybean genome, with a number of structural variants such as presence/absence variants and copy number variants including genic regions, as well as the fact that a number of genes are present only in particular varieties, the GMO Panel concludes that comparing only to the reference genome does not allow to conclude that the transformation event resulted in gene loss. In support of this, the transcriptomic analysis did not show major differences in gene expression when comparing the soybean 40-3-2 with the most closely related conventional variety, indicating that the genetic redundancy may compensate for the potential gene loss. Moreover, the composition, phenotypic and agronomic analyses already assessed by the GMO Panel in previous opinions did not show differences between soybean 40-3-2 and its comparators suggesting that the potential gene loss may not have a significant phenotypic effect in soybean 40-3-2. For these reasons, the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that the new information provided by the applicant on soybean 40-3-2 does not alter EFSA's previous conclusions.

摘要

转基因大豆40-3-2表达来自 sp. 菌株CP4的5-烯醇丙酮酸莽草酸-3-磷酸合酶蛋白(CP4 EPSPS),该蛋白赋予对草甘膦的耐受性。该事件先前已由转基因生物小组作为单个事件以及作为双事件组合的一部分进行了评估,并且发现在对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响方面,其与传统对应物和其他合适的对照物一样安全。2021年9月,欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局评估一项新的生物信息学研究,该研究使用现有的大豆参考基因组揭示了插入位点的预测基因组缺失。考虑到大豆基因组的变异性,存在许多结构变异,如存在/缺失变异和包括基因区域在内的拷贝数变异,以及许多基因仅存在于特定品种中的事实,转基因生物小组得出结论,仅与参考基因组进行比较并不能得出转化事件导致基因丢失的结论。为此提供支持的是,转录组分析表明,将大豆40-3-2与最密切相关的传统品种进行比较时,基因表达没有重大差异,这表明遗传冗余可能弥补了潜在的基因丢失。此外,转基因生物小组在先前意见中已经评估的成分、表型和农艺分析表明,大豆40-3-2与其对照物之间没有差异,这表明潜在的基因丢失可能对大豆40-3-2没有显著的表型影响。出于这些原因,欧洲食品安全局转基因生物小组得出结论,申请人提供的关于大豆40-3-2的新信息不会改变欧洲食品安全局先前的结论。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Pan-Genome of Wild and Cultivated Soybeans.野生和栽培大豆的泛基因组
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):162-176.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean.古多倍体大豆基因组序列。
Nature. 2010 Jan 14;463(7278):178-83. doi: 10.1038/nature08670.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验