• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk assessment of a new bioinformatics evaluation of the insertion sites of genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.转基因大豆事件40-3-2插入位点的新型生物信息学评估的风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jul 22;20(7):e07412. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7412. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Risk assessment of new sequencing information on genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.转基因大豆事件40-3-2新测序信息的风险评估
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 7;15(8):e04968. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4968. eCollection 2017 Aug.
3
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-135).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-135)对用于食品和饲料用途的转基因大豆MON 87708×MON 89788×A5547-127进行评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 5;17(7):e05733. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Risk assessment of new sequencing information on genetically modified soybean event 305423.转基因大豆事件305423新测序信息的风险评估
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 7;15(8):e04967. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4967. eCollection 2017 Aug.
5
Scientific opinion on application EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-120 for authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 × A5547-127 for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Bayer CropScience LP and M.S. Technologies LLC.关于拜耳作物科学有限责任公司和M.S. 技术有限责任公司依据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规提交的转基因大豆FG72×A5547 - 127用于食品、饲料、进口及加工的授权申请(申请编号:EFSA - GMO - NL - 2013 - 120)的科学意见
EFSA J. 2017 Apr 6;15(4):e04744. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4744. eCollection 2017 Apr.
6
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-128).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-128)对转基因大豆MON 87751×MON 87701×MON 87708×MON 89788进行食品和饲料用途评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Nov 11;17(11):e05847. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5847. eCollection 2019 Nov.
7
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2015-126).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号:EFSA-GMO-NL-2015-126),对用于食品和饲料用途的转基因大豆MON 87705×MON 87708×MON 89788进行评估。
EFSA J. 2020 May 18;18(5):e06111. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6111. eCollection 2020 May.
8
Scientific Opinion on application EFSA-GMO-BE-2013-117 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company.关于孟山都公司依据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规提交的转基因玉米MON 87427×MON 89034×NK603及其独立于来源的亚组合用于食品、饲料、进口和加工的授权申请(申请编号:EFSA-GMO-BE-2013-117)的科学意见
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 1;15(8):e04922. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4922. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87411 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2015-124).根据(欧盟)第1829/2003号法规(申请编号EFSA-GMO-NL-2015-124)对转基因玉米MON 87411进行食品和饲料用途、进口及加工的评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 28;16(6):e05310. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5310. eCollection 2018 Jun.
10
Risk assessment of new sequencing information for genetically modified soybean BPS-CV127-9.转基因大豆BPS-CV127-9新测序信息的风险评估
EFSA J. 2018 Sep 21;16(9):e05425. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5425. eCollection 2018 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of genetically modified soybean 40-3-2 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-023).根据欧盟法规(EC)No 1829/2003对转基因大豆40-3-2进行续期授权评估(申请编号EFSA-GMO-RX-023)。
EFSA J. 2022 Dec 19;20(12):e07685. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7685. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Sequencing the USDA core soybean collection reveals gene loss during domestication and breeding.对美国农业部核心大豆种质库进行测序揭示了驯化和育种过程中的基因丢失。
Plant Genome. 2022 Mar;15(1):e20109. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20109. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Risk assessment of new sequencing information on genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.转基因大豆事件40-3-2新测序信息的风险评估
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 7;15(8):e04968. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4968. eCollection 2017 Aug.
3
Pan-Genome of Wild and Cultivated Soybeans.野生和栽培大豆的泛基因组
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):162-176.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean.古多倍体大豆基因组序列。
Nature. 2010 Jan 14;463(7278):178-83. doi: 10.1038/nature08670.
5
Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars.转基因对大豆全球基因表达的影响在传统品种自然变异范围内。
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 May 14;56(9):3057-67. doi: 10.1021/jf073505i. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
6
Gene duplication and paleopolyploidy in soybean and the implications for whole genome sequencing.大豆中的基因复制与古多倍体及其对全基因组测序的影响
BMC Genomics. 2007 Sep 19;8:330. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-330.
7
Chemical composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean 40-3-2 grown in Europe remains equivalent with that of conventional soybean (Glycine max L.).在欧洲种植的耐草甘膦大豆40-3-2的化学成分与传统大豆(大豆属)的化学成分保持一致。
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Jul 25;55(15):6160-8. doi: 10.1021/jf0704920. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
8
Current methods for assessing safety of genetically modified crops as exemplified by data on Roundup Ready soybeans.以抗草甘膦转基因大豆的数据为例的转基因作物安全性评估现行方法。
Toxicol Pathol. 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):117-25. doi: 10.1080/01926230252824806.
9
Compositional analysis of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans treated with glyphosate.用草甘膦处理的耐草甘膦大豆的成分分析。
J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Oct;47(10):4469-73. doi: 10.1021/jf990056g.
10
Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells.体细胞植物细胞双链断裂修复过程中基因组和T-DNA序列的捕获。
EMBO J. 1998 Oct 15;17(20):6086-95. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.20.6086.

转基因大豆事件40-3-2插入位点的新型生物信息学评估的风险评估

Risk assessment of a new bioinformatics evaluation of the insertion sites of genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.

作者信息

Mullins Ewen, Bresson Jean-Louis, Dalmay Tamas, Dewhurst Ian Crawford, Epstein Michelle M, Firbank Leslie George, Guerche Philippe, Hejatko Jan, Moreno Francisco Javier, Naegeli Hanspeter, Nogué Fabien, Rostoks Nils, Sánchez Serrano Jose Juan, Savoini Giovanni, Veromann Eve, Veronesi Fabio, Goumperis Tilemachos, Raffaello Tommaso

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Jul 22;20(7):e07412. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7412. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7412
PMID:35898294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9305392/
Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) soybean 40-3-2 expresses a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase protein from sp. strain CP4 (CP4 EPSPS), which confers tolerance to glyphosate. This event was previously assessed by the GMO Panel as a single event and as part of a two-event stack and was found to be as safe as its conventional counterparts and other appropriate comparators with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. On September 2021, the European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate a new bioinformatics study which revealed predicted genomic deletions at the insertion sites using the available soybean reference genome. Considering the variability of the soybean genome, with a number of structural variants such as presence/absence variants and copy number variants including genic regions, as well as the fact that a number of genes are present only in particular varieties, the GMO Panel concludes that comparing only to the reference genome does not allow to conclude that the transformation event resulted in gene loss. In support of this, the transcriptomic analysis did not show major differences in gene expression when comparing the soybean 40-3-2 with the most closely related conventional variety, indicating that the genetic redundancy may compensate for the potential gene loss. Moreover, the composition, phenotypic and agronomic analyses already assessed by the GMO Panel in previous opinions did not show differences between soybean 40-3-2 and its comparators suggesting that the potential gene loss may not have a significant phenotypic effect in soybean 40-3-2. For these reasons, the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that the new information provided by the applicant on soybean 40-3-2 does not alter EFSA's previous conclusions.

摘要

转基因大豆40-3-2表达来自 sp. 菌株CP4的5-烯醇丙酮酸莽草酸-3-磷酸合酶蛋白(CP4 EPSPS),该蛋白赋予对草甘膦的耐受性。该事件先前已由转基因生物小组作为单个事件以及作为双事件组合的一部分进行了评估,并且发现在对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响方面,其与传统对应物和其他合适的对照物一样安全。2021年9月,欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局评估一项新的生物信息学研究,该研究使用现有的大豆参考基因组揭示了插入位点的预测基因组缺失。考虑到大豆基因组的变异性,存在许多结构变异,如存在/缺失变异和包括基因区域在内的拷贝数变异,以及许多基因仅存在于特定品种中的事实,转基因生物小组得出结论,仅与参考基因组进行比较并不能得出转化事件导致基因丢失的结论。为此提供支持的是,转录组分析表明,将大豆40-3-2与最密切相关的传统品种进行比较时,基因表达没有重大差异,这表明遗传冗余可能弥补了潜在的基因丢失。此外,转基因生物小组在先前意见中已经评估的成分、表型和农艺分析表明,大豆40-3-2与其对照物之间没有差异,这表明潜在的基因丢失可能对大豆40-3-2没有显著的表型影响。出于这些原因,欧洲食品安全局转基因生物小组得出结论,申请人提供的关于大豆40-3-2的新信息不会改变欧洲食品安全局先前的结论。