Daeschler Simeon C, Wienbruch Rebecca, Bursacovschi Catalina, Zimmermann Kim Sophie, Nemariam Selam Bekure, Harhaus Leila, Kneser Ulrich, Dehé Alfons, Bittner Achim
Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Heidelberg, BG Trauma Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 11;10:868396. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.868396. eCollection 2022.
Chronic nerve compression is the most common indication for nerve surgery. However, the clinical diagnosis still relies on surrogate parameters since devices for direct nerve compression pressure measurement (DNCPM) are clinically unavailable yet. To review previous approaches to DNCPM and evaluate presently available microsensor systems for their feasibility and reliability in preclinical nerve compression models. A scoping literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A subsequent market research aimed at identifying commercially available sensor systems potentially suitable for DNCPM. Sensors were evaluated for feasibility and safety of perineural sensor positioning, tissue compatibility and measurement reliability in a synthetic nerve compression model and an chicken leg model. A scoping literature review identified 197 potentially eligible studies of which 65 were included in the analysis. Previous approaches to DNCPM predominantly used pressure sensing catheters designed for fluid- or intra-compartmental pressure measurement. A market research identified two piezoresistive sensor systems (IntraSense, SMi, United States; Mikro-Cath, Millar, United States) as potentially suitable for intraoperative DNCPM. In both preclinical models, the detected compression pressure differed significantly between sensors and systems showed substantial measurement variability with a median percent coefficient of variation between 15.5% and 32%. Sensor position was accountable for up to 99.1% of the variance. Measurement variability caused by unreliable sensor positioning is a key limitation of presently available sensors when applied for nerve compression measurements. Redesigned systems with small, flat-shaped and longitudinally oriented sensors and dedicated introducers would facilitate sensor positioning and therefore may allow for reliable measurements.
慢性神经压迫是神经外科手术最常见的适应症。然而,由于临床上尚无直接测量神经压迫压力的设备,临床诊断仍依赖于替代参数。回顾以往直接测量神经压迫压力的方法,并评估目前可用的微传感器系统在临床前神经压迫模型中的可行性和可靠性。根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行了范围性文献综述。随后进行了市场调研,旨在确定可能适用于直接测量神经压迫压力的商用传感器系统。在合成神经压迫模型和鸡腿模型中,对传感器的神经周围定位的可行性和安全性、组织相容性和测量可靠性进行了评估。范围性文献综述确定了197项可能符合条件的研究,其中65项纳入分析。以往直接测量神经压迫压力的方法主要使用专为测量流体或腔内压力而设计的压力传感导管。市场调研确定了两种压阻式传感器系统(美国IntraSense公司的SMi和美国Millar公司的Mikro-Cath)可能适用于术中直接测量神经压迫压力。在两个临床前模型中,传感器之间检测到的压迫压力差异显著,系统显示出很大的测量变异性,变异系数中位数在15.5%至32%之间。传感器位置对高达99.1%的方差负责。当应用于神经压迫测量时,由不可靠的传感器定位引起的测量变异性是目前可用传感器的一个关键限制。重新设计的系统采用小型、扁平形状和纵向取向的传感器以及专用的导入器,将便于传感器定位,因此可能实现可靠的测量。