College of Education in Wadi Addawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
College of Education, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;2022:6595799. doi: 10.1155/2022/6595799. eCollection 2022.
Several problems remain, despite the evident advantages of sentiment analysis of public opinion represented on Twitter and Facebook. On complicated training data, hybrid approaches may reduce sentiment mistakes. This research assesses the dependability of numerous hybrid approaches on a variety of datasets. Across domains and datasets, we compare hybrid models to singles. Text tweets and reviews are included in our deep sentiment analysis learning systems. The support vector machine (SVM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and ghost model convolution neural network (CNN) are combined to get the hybrid model. The dependability and computation time of each approach were evaluated. On all datasets, hybrid models outperform single models when deep learning and SVM are combined. The traditional models were less trustworthy, and deep learning algorithms have recently shown their enormous promise in sentiment analysis. Linear transformations are used in feature maps to eliminate duplicate or related features. The ghost unit makes ghost features by taking away attributes that are both similar and duplicated from each intrinsic feature. LSTM produces higher results but takes longer to process, while CNN needs less hyperparameter adjusting and monitoring. The effectiveness of the integrated model varies depending on the work, and all performed better than the others. For hybrid deep sentiment analysis learning models, LSTM networks, CNNs, and SVMs are needed. Hybrid models are used to compare SVM, LSTM, and CNN, and we tested each method's accuracy and errors. Deep learning-SVM hybrid models improve sentiment analysis accuracy. Experimental results have shown the accuracy of the proposed model shown 91.3 percent and 91.5 percent for datasets type 1 and 8, respectively.
尽管在 Twitter 和 Facebook 上对公众意见进行情感分析具有明显的优势,但仍存在一些问题。在复杂的训练数据中,混合方法可能会减少情感错误。本研究评估了多种混合方法在各种数据集上的可靠性。在跨领域和数据集的情况下,我们将混合模型与单模型进行比较。我们的深度情感分析学习系统包括文本推文和评论。支持向量机(SVM)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和幽灵模型卷积神经网络(CNN)相结合,得到混合模型。评估了每种方法的可靠性和计算时间。在所有数据集上,当深度学习和 SVM 相结合时,混合模型的性能优于单模型。传统模型的可信度较低,而深度学习算法最近在情感分析中显示出了巨大的潜力。特征图中的线性变换用于消除重复或相关的特征。幽灵单元通过从每个内在特征中去除相似和重复的属性来生成幽灵特征。LSTM 产生更高的结果,但处理时间更长,而 CNN 需要更少的超参数调整和监控。集成模型的有效性取决于具体的工作,所有模型的表现都优于其他模型。对于混合深度情感分析学习模型,需要使用 LSTM 网络、CNN 和 SVM。混合模型用于比较 SVM、LSTM 和 CNN,我们测试了每种方法的准确性和误差。深度学习-SVM 混合模型提高了情感分析的准确性。实验结果表明,所提出模型在数据集 1 和 8 上的准确率分别为 91.3%和 91.5%。