Suppr超能文献

接受内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠病变患者的短期结局。

Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions.

作者信息

Nakajima Yuki, Nemoto Daiki, Nemoto Tetsutaro, Takahata Yosuke, Aizawa Masato, Utano Kenichi, Isohata Noriyuki, Endo Shungo, Lefor Alan Kawarai, Togashi Kazutomo

机构信息

Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan.

Department of Surgery Jichi Medical University Tochigi Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2022 Jun 16;3(1):e136. doi: 10.1002/deo2.136. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions was invented in Japan, but postoperative management including hospital stay has not been reconsidered due to the Japanese insurance system. To explore appropriate postoperative management after colorectal ESD, we reviewed short-term outcomes after ESD in non-selected consecutive patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colorectal ESD from April 2013 to September 2020 in one institution were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of adverse events stratified by the Clavien-Dindo classification with five grades. A logistic regression model with the Firth procedure was applied to investigate predictors of severe (grade III or greater) adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients (female 40%, male 60%; median 72 years; IQR 65-80 years) with colorectal lesions (median 30 mm, IQR 23-40 mm; colon 77%, rectum 23%; serrated lesion 4%, adenoma 47%, mucosal cancer 30%, invasive cancer 18%) was evaluated. The en bloc resection rate was 97%. The median dissection time was 58 min (IQR: 38-86). Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 3%, all successfully treated by endoscopic clipping. No delayed perforations occurred. Postprocedural bleeding occurred in 3% on days 1-10 (median day 2); all were controlled endoscopically. Severe adverse events included only delayed bleeding. In analyzing severe adverse events in a multivariate logistic regression model with the Firth procedure, antithrombotic agent use ( = 0.016) and rectal lesions ( = 0.0010) were both significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

No serious adverse events occurred in this series. Four days of hospitalization may be too long for the majority of patients after ESD.

摘要

目的

大肠病变的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是在日本发明的,但由于日本的保险制度,包括住院时间在内的术后管理尚未重新审视。为了探索大肠ESD术后的适当管理,我们回顾了非选择性连续患者ESD后的短期结果。

方法

回顾了2013年4月至2020年9月在一家机构接受大肠ESD的患者。主要结局指标是根据Clavien-Dindo分类分为五个等级的不良事件的发生情况。应用带有Firth程序的逻辑回归模型来研究严重(III级或更高)不良事件的预测因素。

结果

共评估了330例大肠病变患者(女性40%,男性60%;中位年龄72岁;四分位间距65 - 80岁)(中位病变大小30mm,四分位间距23 - 40mm;结肠77%,直肠23%;锯齿状病变4%,腺瘤47%,黏膜癌30%,浸润癌18%)。整块切除率为97%。中位剥离时间为58分钟(四分位间距:38 - 86)。术中穿孔发生率为3%,均通过内镜夹闭成功治疗。无延迟穿孔发生。术后1 - 10天(中位第2天)出血发生率为3%;均通过内镜控制。严重不良事件仅包括延迟出血。在使用Firth程序的多变量逻辑回归模型分析严重不良事件时,抗血栓药物使用(P = 0.016)和直肠病变(P = 0.0010)均为显著预测因素。

结论

本系列中未发生严重不良事件。对于大多数ESD术后患者,四天的住院时间可能过长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/9307737/814d9721a26b/DEO2-3-e136-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions.
DEN Open. 2022 Jun 16;3(1):e136. doi: 10.1002/deo2.136. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov 25;7(17):1243-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243.
4
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia at anastomotic sites: a retrospective study.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5495-5500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07346-0. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a US multicenter study.
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E354-E360. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-8756. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
9
Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Clin Endosc. 2023 Jul;56(4):423-432. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.104. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Second-look endoscopy findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(5):1063-1073. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.058. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Outpatient ESD for challenging colorectal lesions: Is it feasible and safe for western countries?
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E438-E442. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1736. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jun;160(7):2317-2327.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Effect of anticoagulants on the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Nov;8(11):E1654-E1663. doi: 10.1055/a-1244-2097. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer disparities and the way forward.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):946-950. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.042. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Considerations in performing endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3758. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
9
Novel Coronavirus and Old Lessons - Preparing the Health System for the Pandemic.
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):e55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005118. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
10
Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma: the 3d English Edition [Secondary Publication].
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019 Oct 30;3(4):175-195. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-018. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验