Pecere Silvia, Barbaro Federico, Petruzziello Lucio, Papparella Luigi Giovanni, Napoli Marco, Boskoski Ivo, Costamagna Guido
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training - CERTT, Rome, Italy.
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E438-E442. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1736. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
The need for hospital beds during the COVID-19 pandemic almost overwhelmed the health care systems all over the world. Therefore, elective non-life-saving procedures were postponed. We decided to perform all colorectal endoscopic mucosal dissections (ESDs) for challenging lesions as outpatient procedures, organizing an ad hoc path to management of any delayed post-procedural complications. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of outpatient ESD for colorectal tumors. From March 2020 to May 2020, outpatient colorectal ESDs were performed for 15 challenging lesions. We retrospectively investigated feasibility and safety of the procedures, rates of en bloc resection, and complications rates. The mean age of the patients was 66.5 years and 40 % of the them were on antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy. Median size of removed lesions was 45 mm (range 32-77) and 38 mm (range 24 to 55) Five patients (33 %) had rectal tumors extending to the dentate line and four (26.6 %) were recurrences on a scar of previous endoscopic or surgical local resections. All complications, such as bleeding or visible microperforation, were managed endoscopically and no delayed perforations occurred. One patient had fever (37.5 °C), while three patients complained of anal pain after ESD for a rectal tumor that extended to the dentate line (RTDL); all patients were managed conservatively. Outpatient colorectal ESD is feasible and safe for challenging lesions. It reduces costs of hospitalization but direct access to the endoscopy service to manage potential post-ESD complications should always be guaranteed.
在新冠疫情期间,对医院病床的需求几乎压垮了世界各地的医疗系统。因此,择期非挽救生命的手术被推迟。我们决定将所有具有挑战性病变的结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)作为门诊手术进行,并制定了一条专门的路径来处理术后任何延迟出现的并发症。本研究的目的是回顾性评估门诊结直肠ESD治疗结直肠肿瘤的可行性和安全性。2020年3月至2020年5月,对15例具有挑战性的病变进行了门诊结直肠ESD。我们回顾性调查了手术的可行性和安全性、整块切除率以及并发症发生率。患者的平均年龄为66.5岁,其中40%的患者正在接受抗血小板/抗凝治疗。切除病变的中位大小为45mm(范围32 - 77)和38mm(范围24至55)。5例患者(33%)的直肠肿瘤延伸至齿状线,4例(26.6%)为既往内镜或手术局部切除瘢痕处的复发肿瘤。所有并发症,如出血或可见的微小穿孔,均通过内镜处理,未发生延迟穿孔。1例患者出现发热(37.5°C),而3例直肠肿瘤延伸至齿状线(RTDL)的患者在ESD后抱怨肛门疼痛;所有患者均接受保守治疗。门诊结直肠ESD治疗具有挑战性的病变是可行且安全的。它降低了住院成本,但应始终保证直接接入内镜服务以处理潜在的ESD后并发症。