• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于多向敏感性分析的主动学习及其在疾病筛查建模中的应用

Active Learning for Multi-way Sensitivity Analysis with Application to Disease Screening Modeling.

作者信息

Cevik Mucahit, Angco Sabrina, Heydarigharaei Elham, Jahanshahi Hadi, Prayogo Nicholas

机构信息

Toronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.

出版信息

J Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Jul 15;6(3):317-343. doi: 10.1007/s41666-022-00117-y. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1007/s41666-022-00117-y
PMID:35898852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9309115/
Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is an important aspect of model development as it can be used to assess the level of confidence that is associated with the outcomes of a study. In many practical problems, sensitivity analysis involves evaluating a large number of parameter combinations which may require an extensive amount of time and resources. However, such a computational burden can be avoided by identifying smaller subsets of parameter combinations that can be later used to generate the desired outcomes for other parameter combinations. In this study, we investigate machine learning-based approaches for speeding up the sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, we apply feature selection methods to identify the relative importance of quantitative model parameters in terms of their predictive ability on the outcomes. Finally, we highlight the effectiveness of active learning strategies in improving the sensitivity analysis processes by reducing the total number of quantitative model runs required to construct a high-performance prediction model. Our experiments on two datasets obtained from the sensitivity analysis performed for two disease screening modeling studies indicate that ensemble methods such as Random Forests and XGBoost consistently outperform other machine learning algorithms in the prediction task of the associated sensitivity analysis. In addition, we note that active learning can lead to significant speed-ups in sensitivity analysis by enabling the selection of more useful parameter combinations (i.e., instances) to be used for prediction models.

摘要

敏感性分析是模型开发的一个重要方面,因为它可用于评估与研究结果相关的置信水平。在许多实际问题中,敏感性分析涉及评估大量的参数组合,这可能需要大量的时间和资源。然而,通过识别较小的参数组合子集,随后可用于为其他参数组合生成所需结果,这样的计算负担是可以避免的。在本研究中,我们研究基于机器学习的方法来加速敏感性分析。此外,我们应用特征选择方法来确定定量模型参数在对结果的预测能力方面的相对重要性。最后,我们强调主动学习策略通过减少构建高性能预测模型所需的定量模型运行总数来提高敏感性分析过程的有效性。我们对从两项疾病筛查建模研究的敏感性分析中获得的两个数据集进行的实验表明,诸如随机森林和XGBoost等集成方法在相关敏感性分析的预测任务中始终优于其他机器学习算法。此外,我们注意到主动学习可以通过选择更有用的参数组合(即实例)用于预测模型,从而显著加快敏感性分析的速度。

相似文献

1
Active Learning for Multi-way Sensitivity Analysis with Application to Disease Screening Modeling.用于多向敏感性分析的主动学习及其在疾病筛查建模中的应用
J Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Jul 15;6(3):317-343. doi: 10.1007/s41666-022-00117-y. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models.利用主动学习加速仿真模型中的校准
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul;36(5):581-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15611359. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
3
Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.利用电子病历数据构建机器学习模型的联合建模策略:以脑出血为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02018-x.
4
Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.利用大数据和机器学习方法从电子健康记录中准确预测高血压患者的冠心病:模型开发与性能评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e17257. doi: 10.2196/17257.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.利用机器学习实现猪生产性状的遗传位点筛选和基因组预测。
FASEB J. 2023 Jun;37(6):e22961. doi: 10.1096/fj.202300245R.
7
Predicting Measles Outbreaks in the United States: Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches.预测美国的麻疹疫情:机器学习方法评估
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 4;7:e42832. doi: 10.2196/42832.
8
The parameter sensitivity of random forests.随机森林的参数敏感性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;17(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1228-x.
9
A multicenter random forest model for effective prognosis prediction in collaborative clinical research network.多中心随机森林模型在协作临床研究网络中的有效预后预测。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Mar;103:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101814. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.机器学习方法预测抗血栓治疗患者胃肠道出血的效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703.

本文引用的文献

1
Pool-Based Sequential Active Learning for Regression.基于池的回归序贯主动学习
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2019 May;30(5):1348-1359. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2868649. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis on Markov models with uncertain transition probabilities: an application in evaluating treatment decisions for type 2 diabetes.具有不确定转移概率的马尔可夫模型的概率敏感性分析:在评估 2 型糖尿病治疗决策中的应用。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Mar;22(1):34-52. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9420-8. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Sensitivity Analysis in Sequential Decision Models.序贯决策模型中的敏感性分析
Med Decis Making. 2017 Feb;37(2):243-252. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16670605. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models.利用主动学习加速仿真模型中的校准
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul;36(5):581-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15611359. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
5
Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?主动学习在临床文本分类中的应用:它比随机抽样更好吗?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):809-16. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000648. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model.威斯康星州乳腺癌流行病学模拟模型。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006(36):37-47. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj007.
7
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)技术评估的概率敏感性分析:并非可有可无。
Health Econ. 2005 Apr;14(4):339-47. doi: 10.1002/hec.985.