Editorial: The Process Evaluation of Clinical Trials.
作者信息
Liu Hueiming, Andersson Gerhard, Manchaiah Vinaya
机构信息
Center Health Systems Science, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Newtown, NSW, Australia.
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
出版信息
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 11;9:950637. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950637. eCollection 2022.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editorial: The Process Evaluation of Clinical Trials.社论：临床试验的过程评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 11;9:950637. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950637. eCollection 2022.
2
Protocol for the mixed-methods process and context evaluation of the randomised controlled trial in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.孟加拉国和巴基斯坦随机对照试验的混合方法过程与背景评估方案：一项有效性-实施混合研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e019878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019878.
3
Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of a scaled-up whole-school physical activity program for adolescents: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1).一项针对青少年扩大规模的学校体育活动计划的混合实施有效性试验的混合方法过程评估的方案：“人人体育活动 4 计划”（PA4E1）。
Trials. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4187-5.
4
Planning implementation and scale-up of physical activity interventions for people with walking difficulties: study protocol for the process evaluation of the ComeBACK trial.计划实施和扩大针对行动困难人群的身体活动干预措施：ComeBACK 试验过程评估的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05990-3.
5
Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals.理解实施成功：一项深入的、混合方法的过程评估协议，该评估针对一项集群随机对照试验，旨在测试改善澳大利亚医院中林奇综合征检测的方法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 15;10(6):e033552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033552.
6
Qualitative research to inform hypothesis testing for fidelity-based sub-group analysis in clinical trials: lessons learnt from the process evaluation of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention.为临床试验中基于保真度的亚组分析提供假设检验信息的定性研究：从一项预防跌倒的多方面足病干预措施的过程评估中吸取的经验教训。
Trials. 2020 Apr 21;21(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04274-6.
7
Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD): a protocol for process evaluation in cluster randomized controlled trials in five European countries.个体化慢性病实施（TICD）：在五个欧洲国家进行的群组随机对照试验中的过程评估方案。
Trials. 2014 Mar 21;15:87. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-87.
8
Transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation study (the STEPSTONES project).先天性心脏病青少年向成年过渡期的过渡项目：混合方法过程评估研究方案（STEPSTONES 项目）。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028229.
9
Understanding Implementation of a Digital Self-Monitoring Intervention for Relapse Prevention in Psychosis: Protocol for a Mixed Method Process Evaluation.了解数字自我监测干预措施在预防精神病复发中的实施情况：混合方法过程评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 10;8(12):e15634. doi: 10.2196/15634.
10
App-Delivered Self-Management Intervention Trial selfBACK for People With Low Back Pain: Protocol for Implementation and Process Evaluation.应用程序提供的腰痛患者自我管理干预试验selfBACK：实施与过程评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 29;9(10):e20308. doi: 10.2196/20308.
引用本文的文献
1
The Physical Activity at Work (PAW) Program in Thai Office Workers: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study.泰国上班族工作场所身体活动（PAW）项目：混合方法过程评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 2;9:e57604. doi: 10.2196/57604.
2
Addressing Challenges to Enhance Clinical Research in Portugal: Insights from the OncoT3 Expert Group Delphi Study.应对挑战以加强葡萄牙的临床研究：OncoT3专家小组德尔菲研究的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73720. eCollection 2024 Nov.
本文引用的文献
1
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架：对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
2
Qualitative Methodology in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Contemporary Look.心血管结局研究中的定性方法：当代视角
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005828. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005828. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review.基层医疗干预措施治疗慢性病的效果评价：系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 6;9(8):e025127. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025127.
4
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
5
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估：医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
6
Evolution of clinical research: a history before and beyond james lind.临床研究的演变：詹姆斯·林德之前及之后的历史
Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Jan;1(1):6-10.
7
Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study.在复杂医疗保健干预措施的随机对照试验中运用定性方法：方法学研究
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3496.
8
Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research.定性研究方法和混合研究方法为结果研究做出了独特贡献。
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.
9
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响：RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
Zotero 插件