Suppr超能文献

保护义务、堕胎与器官捐赠。

The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation.

机构信息

Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan49008, USA.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2022 Jul;31(3):333-343. doi: 10.1017/S096318012100102X.

Abstract

Some people oppose abortion on the grounds that fetuses have full moral status and thus a right to not be killed. We argue that special obligations that hold between mother and fetus also hold between parents and their children. We argue that if these special obligations necessitate the sacrifice of bodily autonomy in the case of abortion, then they also necessitate the sacrifice of bodily autonomy in the case of organ donation. If we accept the argument that it is obligatory to override a woman's bodily autonomy for the sake of an unborn child's survival, we must continue to override the bodily autonomy of parents to ensure the survival of their living children, until the parent no longer has a special obligation to their child to the same degree as their special obligation to the fetus. And if the life of a child is truly more important than the bodily autonomy of its parents, as must be the case to force women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, this should remain true until such a time that their children are no longer considered their responsibility. Thus, parity of reasoning suggests that policies compelling the gestation of a fetus should be accompanied by policies compelling organ donation.

摘要

有些人反对堕胎,理由是胎儿具有完全的道德地位,因此有权不被杀害。我们认为,母亲和胎儿之间的特殊义务也存在于父母和子女之间。我们认为,如果这些特殊义务在堕胎的情况下需要牺牲身体自主权,那么在器官捐赠的情况下也需要牺牲身体自主权。如果我们接受为了未出生孩子的生存而必须凌驾于女性身体自主权之上的论点,那么我们必须继续凌驾于父母的身体自主权之上,以确保其活着的孩子的生存,直到父母对孩子的特殊义务与其对胎儿的特殊义务程度相同。如果孩子的生命真的比其父母的身体自主权更重要,就像必须迫使妇女怀孕到足月一样,那么这应该一直保持到他们的孩子不再被视为他们的责任为止。因此,推理的平等性表明,强制胎儿妊娠的政策应该伴随着强制器官捐赠的政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验