• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们如何看待自己给他人留下的印象?元认知的态度和实质。

How do people think about the impressions they make on others? The attitudes and substance of metaperceptions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Management.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar;124(3):640-658. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000433. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000433
PMID:35901366
Abstract

This research aims to further our understanding of the processes of metaperception formation and meta-accuracy by introducing the positivity-specificity model to metaperception, which can be used to disentangle two components of trait metaperceptions: metapositivity (attitudes) and trait-specificity (substance). In two North American samples (Sample 1, = 547; Sample 2, = 553), we used the positivity-specificity model to investigate five important aspects of metaperceptions, namely the extent to which (a) metaperceptions reflect metapositivity versus trait-specificity, (b) metapositivity reflects attitudes about the self, (c) the effects of metapositivity and trait-specificity vary across traits and acquaintances, (d) metapositivity helps or hurts meta-accuracy, and (e) metapositivity and trait-specificity are accurate independent of self-perceptions. Overall, participants' ideas about how they were seen included attitudes and substance, but the relative contribution of each depended on the trait being judged and on how well they knew an acquaintance. Participants' ideas about how positively they were seen were related to how positively they saw themselves to varying degrees depending on how much they knew and liked their acquaintances. Participants were also accurate about how positively they were seen and about how they were seen on a given trait, independent of positivity and, with close acquaintances, independent of self-perceptions. The current work demonstrates how the positivity-specificity model can be used to investigate how people think about and have insight into the impressions they make on others. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究旨在通过将正性特异性模型引入元知觉,进一步了解元知觉形成和元准确性的过程,该模型可用于区分特质元知觉的两个组成部分:元正性(态度)和特质特异性(实质)。在两个北美样本(样本 1,N = 547;样本 2,N = 553)中,我们使用正性特异性模型研究了元知觉的五个重要方面,即:(a)元知觉在多大程度上反映元正性与特质特异性;(b)元正性反映自我态度;(c)元正性和特质特异性的影响在不同特质和熟人之间的变化;(d)元正性有助于或损害元准确性;(e)元正性和特质特异性是否独立于自我知觉而准确。总体而言,参与者对自己被他人看法的想法包括态度和实质,但每种想法的相对贡献取决于被判断的特质以及他们对熟人的了解程度。参与者对自己被他人正面看待的看法与他们对自己的正面看法在一定程度上有关,这取决于他们对熟人的了解程度和喜欢程度。参与者对自己被他人正面看待的看法以及对特定特质的看法是准确的,与正性无关,与亲密熟人有关,与自我知觉无关。本研究表明了如何使用正性特异性模型来研究人们如何思考和洞察自己给他人留下的印象。(美国心理协会,2023 年)

相似文献

1
How do people think about the impressions they make on others? The attitudes and substance of metaperceptions.人们如何看待自己给他人留下的印象?元认知的态度和实质。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar;124(3):640-658. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000433. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Social anxiety and liking: Towards understanding the role of metaperceptions in first impressions.社交焦虑与喜爱:理解元认知在第一印象中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;121(4):948-968. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000363. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
3
Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you.元准确性与关系质量:权衡了解他人对你真实看法的成本与收益。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):250-64. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000107. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
"Zooming" in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions: Examining the links with social anxiety and liking in online video interactions.在第一印象中准确感知积极和准确的印象:在线视频互动中考察与社交焦虑和喜欢的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;125(4):852-873. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000457. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Do you make a better or worse impression than you think?你给人的印象比你想象的要好还是要差?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Dec;123(6):1407-1420. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000434. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
6
Do people know how others view them? Two approaches for identifying the accuracy of metaperceptions.人们知道别人如何看待他们吗?两种识别元认知准确性的方法。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception.熟人之间的元准确性:人际感知与元感知的社会关系分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):66-74. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.66.
8
Blissfully Blind or Painfully Aware? Exploring the Beliefs People With Interpersonal Problems Have About Their Reputation.盲目幸福还是痛苦自知?探索人际问题人群对其声誉的信念。
J Pers. 2017 Dec;85(6):757-768. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12284. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
The Role of Metaperception in Personality Disorders: Do People with Personality Problems Know How Others Experience Their Personality?元认知在人格障碍中的作用:有个性问题的人知道别人如何看待他们的个性吗?
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):449-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.449.
10
Accuracy and bias in perceptions of racial attitudes: Implications for interracial relationships.感知种族态度的准确性和偏差:对 interracial relationships 的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Dec;119(6):1380-1402. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000236. Epub 2020 Feb 27.