• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

B 型利钠肽对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者发生卒中风险的预测价值。

Usefulness of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide for Predicting the Risk of Stroke in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China.

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Guangzhou China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e024302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024302. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.024302
PMID:35904188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9375473/
Abstract

Background B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a well-known biomarker for prognosis in heart failure with patients with preserved ejection fraction. However, the clinical predictive ability of BNP for the risk of stroke in HFpEF is not clear. Methods and Results A total of 799 patients with HFpEF from the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial were included. Association of baseline BNP with risk of stroke was assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. The discriminatory ability of BNP was expressed using the C index. The improvement in 5-year stroke prediction was assessed by C statistic, categorical net reclassification improvement index, and relative integrated discrimination improvement. A total of 34 (4.3%) patients among the 799 patients with HFpEF experienced stroke events over a median of 2.85 years of follow-up. The stroke group showed a higher BNP level than the nonstroke group (375 pg/mL versus 241 pg/mL, respectively; =0.006). Higher BNP levels were associated with increased risk of stroke after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.51-7.16]) and had a moderate performance for stroke prediction (C index, 0.67). Adding BNP to CHADS/CHADS-VASc/RCHADS scores improved their predictive value for stroke (CHADS: C index, 0.67; BNP+CHADS: C index, 0.77; net reclassification improvement, 40.9%; integrated discrimination improvement, 3.0%; CHADS-VASc: C index, 0.64; BNP+CHADS-VASc: C index, 0.74; net reclassification improvement, 41.4%; integrated discrimination improvement, 2.2%; RCHADS: C index, 0.70; BNP+RCHADS: C index, 0.78; net reclassification improvement, 40.9%; integrated discrimination improvement, 3.2%). Conclusions BNP is associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with HFpEF and may be a valuable biomarker for stroke prediction in HFpEF.

摘要

背景 B 型利钠肽(BNP)是射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者预后的一个著名生物标志物。然而,BNP 对 HFpEF 患者中风风险的临床预测能力尚不清楚。

方法和结果 共纳入了 TOPCAT(醛固酮拮抗剂治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭)试验中的 799 例 HFpEF 患者。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估基线 BNP 与中风风险的相关性。使用 C 指数表示 BNP 的区分能力。通过 C 统计量、分类净重新分类改善指数和相对综合判别改善来评估 5 年中风预测的改善情况。在中位随访 2.85 年期间,799 例 HFpEF 患者中共有 34 例(4.3%)发生中风事件。中风组的 BNP 水平高于非中风组(分别为 375pg/ml 和 241pg/ml,=0.006)。多变量调整后,较高的 BNP 水平与中风风险增加相关(危险比,3.29[95%CI,1.51-7.16]),并且对中风预测具有中等的性能(C 指数,0.67)。将 BNP 添加到 CHADS/CHADS-VASc/RCHADS 评分中可提高其对中风的预测价值(CHADS:C 指数,0.67;BNP+CHADS:C 指数,0.77;净重新分类改善,40.9%;综合判别改善,3.0%;CHADS-VASc:C 指数,0.64;BNP+CHADS-VASc:C 指数,0.74;净重新分类改善,41.4%;综合判别改善,2.2%;RCHADS:C 指数,0.70;BNP+RCHADS:C 指数,0.78;净重新分类改善,40.9%;综合判别改善,3.2%)。

结论 BNP 与 HFpEF 患者中风风险增加相关,可能是 HFpEF 患者中风预测的有价值的生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66f/9375473/e1e6104a0410/JAH3-11-e024302-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66f/9375473/2b13cedce19b/JAH3-11-e024302-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66f/9375473/e1e6104a0410/JAH3-11-e024302-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66f/9375473/2b13cedce19b/JAH3-11-e024302-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d66f/9375473/e1e6104a0410/JAH3-11-e024302-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide for Predicting the Risk of Stroke in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.B 型利钠肽对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者发生卒中风险的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e024302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024302. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Usefulness of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.CHADS2、R2CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者发生心房颤动的预测价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1369-1377. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13217. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Predictive value of NT pro BNP for new-onset atrial fibrillation in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.N末端B型利钠肽原对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者新发心房颤动的预测价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4296-4307. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14951. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Essen Stroke Risk Score Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Evidence from the TOPCAT trial.埃森卒中风险评分可预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的临床结局:来自TOPCAT试验的证据。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jan;123(1):85-96. doi: 10.1055/a-1932-8854. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
5
The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.在接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,HAS-BLED 评分对大出血的预测准确性优于 CHADS2 或 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1623. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
6
CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA Scores and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.CHA2DS2-VASc 和 ATRIA 评分与射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Dec;34(6):763-772. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07011-y.
7
How B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and Body Weight Changes Vary in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Compared With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Secondary Results of the HABIT (HF Assessment With BNP in the Home) Trial.B 型利钠肽(BNP)和体重变化在射血分数保留型心力衰竭与射血分数降低型心力衰竭中的差异:HABIT(家庭中 BNP 用于心力衰竭评估)试验的次要结果。
J Card Fail. 2016 Apr;22(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
8
B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with post-discharge stroke in hospitalized patients with heart failure.B 型利钠肽与心力衰竭住院患者出院后中风有关。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2508-2515. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12818. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Interaction Between Spironolactone and Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: From the TOPCAT Trial.螺内酯与利钠肽在射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中的相互作用:来自 TOPCAT 试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.11.015.
10
Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Plasma B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Level in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Reduced, Mid-Range, and Preserved Ejection Fractions.射血分数降低、中等范围及保留的急性心力衰竭患者血浆B型利钠肽水平的长期预后意义
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;121(6):731-738. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Value of NT-proBNP for Functional Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Without Cardiac Disease: A Prospective, Observational Study.NT-proBNP对无心脏病的缺血性卒中功能转归的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jan 27;21:129-140. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S488574. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the Role of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and N-Terminal-proBNP in Thrombosis and Acute Ischemic Stroke Etiology.探究脑钠肽(BNP)和N末端脑钠肽原(NT-proBNP)在血栓形成及急性缺血性脑卒中病因学中的作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 5;25(5):2999. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052999.
3
Do Heart Failure Biomarkers Influence Heart Failure Treatment Response?

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic low-grade inflammation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的慢性低度炎症。
Aging Cell. 2021 Sep;20(9):e13453. doi: 10.1111/acel.13453. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
Disproportionate left atrial myopathy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among participants of the PROMIS-HFpEF study.心力衰竭保留射血分数患者中 PROMS-HFpEF 研究参与者的左心房心肌病变不成比例。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84133-9.
3
Stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure according to heart failure type.
心力衰竭生物标志物会影响心力衰竭的治疗反应吗?
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2023 Oct;20(5):358-373. doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00625-x. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
根据心力衰竭类型,房颤合并心力衰竭患者的卒中和全身性栓塞情况
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1582-1589. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13264. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Usefulness of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.CHADS2、R2CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者发生心房颤动的预测价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1369-1377. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13217. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动诊断和管理特别工作组,由ESC欧洲心律协会(EHRA)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
6
Atrial Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Atrial Fibrillation.射血分数保留的心力衰竭伴心房颤动患者的心房功能障碍。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;76(9):1051-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.009.
7
What should the C ('congestive heart failure') represent in the CHA DS -VASc score?在CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分中,C(“充血性心力衰竭”)代表什么?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1294-1297. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1946. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA Scores and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.CHA2DS2-VASc 和 ATRIA 评分与射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Dec;34(6):763-772. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07011-y.
9
B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with post-discharge stroke in hospitalized patients with heart failure.B 型利钠肽与心力衰竭住院患者出院后中风有关。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2508-2515. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12818. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
10
HFpEF Is the Substrate for Stroke in Obesity and Diabetes Independent of Atrial Fibrillation.HFpEF 是肥胖和糖尿病患者中风的基础,与心房颤动无关。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.