• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与接受居家护理的老年患者死亡地点相关的因素。

Factors associated with death places among elderly patients receiving home-based care.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.

Department of Family Medicine, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29630. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029630.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029630
PMID:35905239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9333526/
Abstract

The quality of end-of-life (EOL) care for patients receiving home-based care is a critical issue for health care providers. Dying in a preferred place is recognized as a key EOL care quality indicator. We explore the factors associated with death at home or nursing facilities among elderly patients receiving home-based care. This retrospective study was based on a medical chart review between January 2018 and December 2019 of elderly patients. Multivariate analysis was conducted by fitting multiple logistic regression models with the stepwise variable selection procedure to explore the associated factors. The 205 elderly patients receiving home-based care were enrolled for analysis. The mean participant age was 84.2 ± 7.8 years. Multiple logistic regression indicated that significant factors for elderly home-based patients who died at home or nursing facilities were receiving palliative service (odds ratio [OR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-7.51; P = .007), symptoms of nausea or vomiting (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.12-25.84; P = .036), fewer emergency department visits (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16; P < .001), and less intravenous third-generation cephalosporin use (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.75; P = .021) in the last month of life. Patients with dementia had a lower probability of dying at home or nursing facilities than patients with other diagnosis (OR, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.13-0.90; P = .030). Among elderly home-based patients, receiving palliative service, with nausea or vomiting, and fewer emergency department visits in the last month of life favored home or nursing facilities deaths. Practitioners should be aware of the factors with higher probabilities of dying at home and in nursing facilities. We suggested that palliative services need to be further developed and extended to ensure that patients with dementia can receive adequate EOL care at home and in nursing facilities.

摘要

居家临终关怀患者的临终关怀质量是医疗服务提供者关注的一个关键问题。在首选地点去世被认为是临终关怀质量的一个关键指标。我们探讨了与居家临终关怀老年患者在家中或护理机构死亡相关的因素。这项回顾性研究基于 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间对接受居家临终关怀的老年患者的病历回顾。采用逐步变量选择程序拟合多变量逻辑回归模型进行多变量分析,以探讨相关因素。共纳入 205 例接受居家临终关怀的老年患者进行分析。参与者的平均年龄为 84.2±7.8 岁。多变量逻辑回归表明,居家临终关怀老年患者在家中或护理机构死亡的显著因素是接受姑息治疗(优势比 [OR],3.21;95%置信区间 [CI],1.37-7.51;P=0.007)、恶心或呕吐症状(OR,5.38;95%CI,1.12-25.84;P=0.036)、较少急诊就诊(OR,0.07;95%CI,0.03-0.16;P<0.001)和较少使用第三代静脉头孢菌素(OR,0.15;95%CI,0.03-0.75;P=0.021)。在生命的最后一个月。痴呆患者在家中或护理机构死亡的概率低于其他诊断患者(OR,0.34,95%CI,0.13-0.90;P=0.030)。在居家临终关怀老年患者中,生命最后一个月接受姑息治疗、有恶心或呕吐症状和较少急诊就诊的患者更倾向于在家中或护理机构死亡。从业者应该意识到哪些因素会增加在家和护理机构死亡的概率。我们建议进一步发展和扩大姑息治疗服务,以确保痴呆患者能够在家中和护理机构得到充分的临终关怀。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166c/9333526/0163e91ac177/medi-101-e29630-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166c/9333526/ac7a9d8b34f7/medi-101-e29630-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166c/9333526/0163e91ac177/medi-101-e29630-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166c/9333526/ac7a9d8b34f7/medi-101-e29630-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166c/9333526/0163e91ac177/medi-101-e29630-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with death places among elderly patients receiving home-based care.与接受居家护理的老年患者死亡地点相关的因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29630. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029630.
2
Quality of end-of-life care of home-based care with or without palliative services for patients with advanced illnesses.晚期疾病患者接受有或无姑息治疗服务的居家照护的临终关怀质量。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 7;100(18):e25841. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025841.
3
Associations between home deaths and end-of-life nursing care trajectories for community-dwelling people: a population-based registry study.居家死亡与社区居住人群临终护理轨迹的关联:基于人群的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4536-9.
4
Does Increasing Home Care Nursing Reduce Emergency Department Visits at the End of Life? A Population-Based Cohort Study of Cancer Decedents.增加家庭护理是否会减少临终时的急诊就诊次数?一项基于人群的癌症死亡者队列研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Factors associated with aggressive end of life cancer care.与癌症临终积极治疗相关的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1079-89. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2885-4. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
Terminal care for persons with advanced dementia in the nursing home and home care settings.养老院和家庭护理环境中晚期痴呆症患者的临终关怀。
J Palliat Med. 2004 Dec;7(6):808-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2004.7.808.
7
A Study of the Association Between Multidisciplinary Home Care and Home Death Among Thai Palliative Care Patients.泰国姑息治疗患者多学科居家护理与在家死亡之间的关联研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;34(5):397-403. doi: 10.1177/1049909116631550. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Equal receipt of specialized palliative care in breast and prostate cancer: a register study.乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者接受同等专业的姑息治疗:一项注册研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7721-7730. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07150-y. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
Palliative care needs, symptoms, and treatment intensity along the disease trajectory in medical oncology outpatients: a retrospective chart review.在肿瘤内科门诊患者的疾病进程中,姑息治疗需求、症状和治疗强度:一项回顾性图表审查。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1743-50. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1721-y. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
10
Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life.生命最后一年中呼吸系统疾病患者在医疗保健利用和死亡地点方面的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1349. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A CDC WONDER Study on Disparities in Place of Death Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States between 1999 and 2020.一项关于1999年至2020年美国系统性红斑狼疮患者死亡地点差异的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER研究。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 4;17(8):e89313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89313. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study.支持接受居家姑息治疗和临终关怀患者在家中离世的因素:一项序贯混合方法解释性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 12;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01840-0.