Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情封锁策略对紧急医疗服务的影响。

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown strategies on emergency medical services.

机构信息

Ankara City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Science, Nursing Department, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in the number of EMS cases by comparing the lockdown period, the non-lockdown period, and the pre-pandemic period.

METHODS

In our study, 3 periods of EMS cases were compared to evaluate the effect of lockdown. The first period (Period A) included in the study was the lockdown period (01-12-2020 and 31-01-2021. The second period (period B) is the period between 01 and 10-2020 and 30-11-2020, where there was no lockdown despite the pandemic. The third period (period C) in the study is the period between 01 and 12-2019 and 31-01-2020 before the pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 120,989 cases in 3 periods were included in the study. It was determined that the highest number of patients were in period C (42,703, 35.3%), while the least was in period A (39,054, 32.2%). On the other hand, it was found that the number of calls was highest in period A (246,200, 35.1%), while the least was in period C (212,267, 30.2%). Response times were longer in the pandemic period than in the pre-pandemic period. Mean talk time were longer during the pandemic period. The most frequent diagnosis in period A (21.6%) and B (42.2%) was COVID-19. The second most frequent disease group in these two periods was cardiovascular diseases.

CONCLUSION

While the number of EMS cases decreased during the pandemic period, it decreased even more during the lockdown period. However, the number of calls increased significantly during the lockdown period, and the response times and talk times increased accordingly.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在通过比较封锁期、非封锁期和大流行前时期,评估紧急医疗服务(EMS)案例数量的变化。

方法

在我们的研究中,比较了 3 个 EMS 案例期,以评估封锁的效果。研究中包含的第一个时期(时期 A)是封锁期(2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日)。第二个时期(时期 B)是大流行期间没有封锁的时期(2020 年 10 月 1 日至 10 日和 11 月 30 日)。研究中的第三个时期(时期 C)是大流行前的时期(2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 31 日)。

结果

共有 3 个时期的 120989 例病例纳入研究。结果确定,患者数量最多的是时期 C(42703 例,35.3%),而数量最少的是时期 A(39054 例,32.2%)。另一方面,发现时期 A 的呼叫数量最高(246200 次,35.1%),而时期 C 的呼叫数量最少(212267 次,30.2%)。在大流行期间,响应时间比大流行前更长。大流行期间的平均通话时间更长。时期 A(21.6%)和 B(42.2%)最常见的诊断是 COVID-19。这两个时期第二常见的疾病组是心血管疾病。

结论

虽然大流行期间 EMS 案例的数量减少了,但在封锁期间甚至减少得更多。然而,封锁期间呼叫数量显著增加,响应时间和通话时间相应增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace8/9186951/0df2d0d4c39e/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验