Department of Second Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Present Address: Department of Anesthesia, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01747-w.
Few studies have investigated the depth of intraoperative analgesia with non-opioid anesthesia. This study evaluated whether opioid-free anesthesia can provide an effective analgesia-antinociception balance monitored by the / pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy.
We enrolled 102 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy with general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups to receive opioid-free anesthesia (group OFA) with dexmedetomidine (loading dose with 0.6 μg·kg for 10 min and then 0.5 μg·kg·h continuous infusion) and sevoflurane plus bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.2 μg·kg dexmedetomidine and 0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side) or opioid-based anesthesia (group OA) with remifentanil, sevoflurane, and bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side). The primary outcome variable was pain intensity during the operation, as assessed by the pain threshold index with the multifunction combination monitor HXD- I. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Student's t-test. The secondary outcomes were wavelet index, lactic levels, and blood glucose concentration during the operation. The visual analog scale (VAS), rescue analgesic consumption, and side-effects of opioids after surgery were further assessed.
One hundred and one patients were included in the analysis. Analysis revealed that the intraoperative pain threshold index readings were not significantly different between the groups from incision to the end of the operation (P = 0.06). Furthermore, similar changes in the brain wavelet index readings were observed in the OFA and OA groups. There was no statistical difference in VAS scores between the groups (P > 0.05); however, non-opioid anesthesia did reduce the rescue analgesic consumption after operation (P < 0.05). In the OFA group, the blood glucose levels increased by 20% compared to baseline and were significantly higher than those in the OA group (P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting, urine retention, intestinal paralysis and pruritus were not significantly different from those in the OA group (P > 0.05).
This study suggests that compared to the opioid anesthesia regimen, our opioid-free anesthesia regimen achieved an equally effective intraoperative pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. The incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions was not different between regimens, and intraoperative blood glucose levels were higher with opioid-free anesthesia.
ChiCTR1900021223, 02/02/2019, Title: " Opioid-free anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial ". Website: hppts:// www.chictr.ogr.cn.
很少有研究调查非阿片类麻醉术中镇痛的深度。本研究评估了在腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术中,无阿片类麻醉能否提供一种有效的镇痛-抗伤害平衡,这种平衡通过/疼痛阈值指数来监测。
我们招募了 102 名接受全身麻醉的腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术患者。参与者被随机分配到两组,分别接受无阿片类麻醉(OFA 组),使用右美托咪定(负荷剂量 0.6μg·kg 持续 10 分钟,然后持续输注 0.5μg·kg·h)和双侧椎旁阻滞(0.2μg·kg 右美托咪定和 0.5%罗哌卡因 15ml 每侧)或基于阿片类药物的麻醉(OA 组),使用瑞芬太尼、七氟醚和双侧椎旁阻滞(0.5%罗哌卡因 15ml 每侧)。主要结局变量是通过多功能组合监测仪 HXD-I 评估的手术过程中的疼痛强度。结果采用重复测量方差分析和学生 t 检验进行分析。次要结局指标为手术过程中的脑波指数、乳酸水平和血糖浓度。进一步评估了术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、解救性镇痛药物的消耗和阿片类药物的副作用。
101 名患者纳入分析。分析显示,从切口到手术结束,两组患者的术中疼痛阈值指数读数没有显著差异(P=0.06)。此外,OFA 和 OA 组的脑波指数读数也有相似的变化。两组患者的 VAS 评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);然而,非阿片类麻醉确实减少了术后的解救性镇痛药物消耗(P<0.05)。在 OFA 组,血糖水平比基线升高 20%,明显高于 OA 组(P<0.001)。术后恶心呕吐、尿潴留、肠麻痹和瘙痒的发生率与 OA 组无显著差异(P>0.05)。
本研究表明,与阿片类药物麻醉方案相比,我们的无阿片类药物麻醉方案在腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术中达到了同样有效的术中疼痛阈值指数。两种方案阿片类药物相关不良反应的发生率无差异,无阿片类药物麻醉术中血糖水平升高。
ChiCTR1900021223,02/02/2019,标题:“腹腔镜手术中的无阿片类麻醉:一项随机对照试验”。网站:hppts://www.chictr.ogr.cn。