• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“孕期保健”:肯尼亚卡卡梅加县的小组产前保健混合方法研究。

"Taking care of your pregnancy": a mixed-methods study of group antenatal care in Kakamega County, Kenya.

机构信息

Management Sciences for Health (MSH), Alexandria, USA.

Scope, Brooklyn, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08200-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08200-1
PMID:35906642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9336107/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional antenatal care (ANC) models often do not meet women's needs for information, counseling, and support, resulting in gaps in quality and coverage. Group ANC (GANC) provides an alternative, person-centered approach where pregnant women of similar gestational age meet with the same health provider for facilitated discussion. F studies show associations between GANC and various outcomes.

METHODS

We employed a pre-post quasi-experimental design using mixed methods to assess a GANC model (Lea Mimba Pregnancy Clubs) at six health facilities in Kakamega County, Kenya. Between April 2018 and January 2019, we tracked 1652 women assigned to 162 GANC cohorts. Using an intention-to-treat approach, we conducted baseline (N = 112) and endline surveys (N = 360) with women attending immunization visits to assess outcomes including experience of care, empowerment and self-efficacy, knowledge of healthy practices and danger signs, and practice of healthy behaviors, including ANC retention. At endline, we conducted 29 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and three focus group discussions with women who were currently and previously participating in GANC, and 15 IDIs with stakeholders.

RESULTS

The proportion of survey respondents with knowledge of three or more danger signs during pregnancy more than tripled, from 7.1% at baseline to 26.4% at endline (OR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.26-10.61). We also found improvements in women's reports about their experience of care between baseline and endline, particularly in their assessment of knowledge and competence of health workers (OR: 2.52 95% CI: 1.57-4.02), respect shown by ANC providers (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.16-2.85), and women's satisfaction with overall quality of care (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03-2.53). We saw an increase from 58.9% at baseline to 71.7% at endline of women who strongly agreed that they shared their feelings and experiences with other women (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.1-2.7). The mean number of ANC visits increased by 0.89 visits (95% CI: 0.47-1.42) between baseline (4.21) and endline (5.08). No changes were seen in knowledge of positive behaviors, empowerment, self-efficacy, and several aspects related to women's experience of care and adoption of healthy behavior constructs. Qualitatively, women and stakeholders noted improved interactions between health providers and women, improved counseling, increased feelings of empowerment to ask questions and speak freely and strengthened social networks and enhanced social cohesion among women.

CONCLUSIONS

GANC offers promise for enhancing women's experience of care by providing improved counseling and social support. Additional research is needed to develop and test measures for empowerment, self-efficacy, and experience of care, and to understand the pathways whereby GANC effects changes in specific outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc34/9336107/4495b629e812/12913_2022_8200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc34/9336107/4495b629e812/12913_2022_8200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc34/9336107/4495b629e812/12913_2022_8200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

传统的产前保健(ANC)模式通常无法满足妇女对信息、咨询和支持的需求,导致质量和覆盖面存在差距。小组 ANC(GANC)提供了一种替代的、以个人为中心的方法,在这种方法中,相似孕龄的孕妇与同一位卫生提供者会面,以进行促进讨论。F 研究表明 GANC 与各种结果之间存在关联。

方法

我们采用了一种准实验前-后设计,结合混合方法,在肯尼亚卡卡梅加县的六家卫生机构评估 GANC 模式(Lea Mimba 妊娠俱乐部)。在 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,我们跟踪了 1652 名被分配到 162 个 GANC 队列的妇女。采用意向治疗方法,我们对参加免疫访问的妇女进行了基线(N=112)和终点(N=360)调查,以评估包括护理体验、赋权和自我效能、健康实践和危险信号知识以及健康行为实践(包括 ANC 保留)等结果。在终点,我们对当前和以前参加 GANC 的妇女进行了 29 次深度访谈(IDIs)和三次焦点小组讨论,对 15 名利益相关者进行了 15 次 IDIs。

结果

在怀孕期间知道三个或更多危险信号的调查受访者的比例增加了两倍多,从基线时的 7.1%增加到终点时的 26.4%(OR:4.58;95%CI:2.26-10.61)。我们还发现,妇女对护理体验的报告在基线和终点之间有所改善,特别是在卫生工作者的知识和能力评估方面(OR:2.52;95%CI:1.57-4.02),ANC 提供者表现出的尊重(OR:1.82;95%CI:1.16-2.85),以及妇女对整体护理质量的满意度(OR:1.62;95%CI:1.03-2.53)。我们看到,从基线时的 58.9%增加到终点时的 71.7%,强烈同意她们与其他妇女分享感受和经验的妇女比例(OR:1.73;95%CI:1.1-2.7)。ANC 访问次数的平均值增加了 0.89 次(95%CI:0.47-1.42),从基线(4.21)到终点(5.08)。妇女的积极行为知识、赋权、自我效能以及与妇女护理体验和健康行为结构采用相关的几个方面均无变化。定性研究表明,卫生提供者和妇女之间的互动有所改善,咨询有所改善,妇女提问和自由发言的能力有所增强,社会网络得到加强,妇女之间的社会凝聚力得到增强。

结论

GANC 通过提供改进的咨询和社会支持,为改善妇女的护理体验提供了希望。需要进一步研究开发和测试赋权、自我效能和护理体验的衡量标准,并了解 GANC 影响特定结果变化的途径。

相似文献

1
"Taking care of your pregnancy": a mixed-methods study of group antenatal care in Kakamega County, Kenya.“孕期保健”:肯尼亚卡卡梅加县的小组产前保健混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08200-1.
2
Temporal relationship between Women's empowerment and utilization of antenatal care services: lessons from four National Surveys in sub-Saharan Africa.妇女赋权与产前保健服务利用之间的时间关系:来自撒哈拉以南非洲四项全国性调查的经验教训。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03679-8.
3
Transforming women's and providers' experience of care for improved outcomes: A theory of change for group antenatal care in Kenya and Nigeria.改变妇女和医护人员的护理体验以改善结果:肯尼亚和尼日利亚小组产前护理的变革理论。
PLoS One. 2022 May 3;17(5):e0265174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265174. eCollection 2022.
4
The role of women's empowerment and male engagement in pregnancy healthcare seeking behaviors in western Kenya.肯尼亚西部妇女赋权和男性参与在孕期就医行为中的作用。
Women Health. 2019 Sep;59(8):892-906. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2019.1567644. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Four antenatal care visits by four months of pregnancy and four vital tests for pregnant mothers: impact of a community-facility health systems strengthening intervention in Migori County, Kenya.四次产前护理访视在怀孕四个月时进行,四项针对孕妇的重要检查:肯尼亚米戈里县社区-医疗机构卫生系统强化干预的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06386-2.
6
Women's autonomy and maternal health decision making in Kenya: implications for service delivery reform - a qualitative study.肯尼亚的妇女自主权和母婴健康决策:对服务提供改革的影响——一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02965-9.
7
The effect of national antenatal care guidelines and provider training on obstetric danger sign counselling: a propensity score matching analysis of the 2014 Ethiopia service provision assessment plus survey.国家产前保健指南和提供者培训对产科危险信号咨询的影响:基于 2014 年埃塞俄比亚服务提供评估加调查的倾向评分匹配分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01442-6.
8
Investigating the quality of family planning counselling as part of routine antenatal care and its effect on intended postpartum contraceptive method choice among women in Nepal.调查尼泊尔女性在常规产前护理中计划生育咨询的质量及其对产后避孕方法选择意向的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00904-y.
9
Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区群组产前护理模式的随机对照试验及与妊娠赋权相关的社会人口学因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 8;17(Suppl 2):336. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1493-3.
10
Effect of community based health education on knowledge and attitude towards iron and folic acid supplementation among pregnant women in Kiambu County, Kenya: A quasi experimental study.肯尼亚基安布县基于社区的健康教育对孕妇铁和叶酸补充知识和态度的影响:一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0224361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224361. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of health facility choice for delivery among women participating in group antenatal care in Machakos county, kenya: A cross-sectional survey.肯尼亚马查科斯县参加集体产前护理的妇女分娩时选择医疗机构的决定因素:一项横断面调查。
Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 22;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w.
2
Exploring Empowerment in Group Antenatal Care: Insights from an Insider and Outsider Perspective.探索集体产前护理中的赋权:来自内部人士和外部人士视角的见解。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;13(15):1930. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151930.
3
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.

本文引用的文献

1
Overcoming access barriers for facility-based delivery in low-income settings: insights from Bangladesh and Uganda.克服低收入环境中基于医疗机构分娩的可及性障碍:来自孟加拉国和乌干达的见解。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Dec;24(4):438-45.
群体产前护理积极改变护理体验:马拉维一项有效性试验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.
4
A systematic review of behaviour change interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.对撒哈拉以南非洲地区改善孕产妇健康结果的行为改变干预措施的系统评价。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 20;4(2):e0002950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002950. eCollection 2024.
5
The Effect of Group Prenatal Care on the Empowerment of Pregnant Adolescents: Randomised controlled trial.小组产前护理对青少年孕妇赋权的影响:随机对照试验。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023 Nov;23(4):502-509. doi: 10.18295/squmj.6.2023.041. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Correction: "Taking care of your pregnancy": a mixed-methods study of group antenatal care in Kakamega County, Kenya.更正:“关爱您的孕期”:肯尼亚卡卡梅加县群体产前护理的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 18;22(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08435-y.