Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Ohio State University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug 1;30(4):281-285. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000817.
We aim to distill the current body of evidence to consider when selecting an endoscopic versus open approach to address cranial base disease. We evaluate the evolution of modern surgical techniques and their respective limitations.
Greater understanding of the role of tumor biology in relation to patient outcomes has led to increasingly sophisticated treatment algorithms. This combined with further development of advanced instrumentation and technique has led to the adoption of new surgical corridors previously unapproachable via traditional surgery.
Endoscopic and open craniofacial approaches both remain important surgical techniques in the management of cranial base tumors. The modern skull base surgeon may employ a combination of approaches to optimize tumor extirpation while preserving functional outcomes. Patient history, anatomic tumor extent, histology, and functional goals should be considered thoroughly when planning any surgical intervention.
我们旨在总结目前的证据,以考虑在选择内镜与开放方法来解决颅底疾病时的注意事项。我们评估了现代手术技术的演变及其各自的局限性。
对肿瘤生物学与患者预后关系的认识不断加深,导致了治疗方案日益复杂。这与先进仪器和技术的进一步发展相结合,开辟了以前通过传统手术无法到达的新手术途径。
内镜和开放式颅面入路在颅底肿瘤的治疗中仍然是重要的手术技术。现代颅底外科医生可能会结合使用多种方法,以在保留功能结果的同时优化肿瘤切除。在计划任何手术干预时,应全面考虑患者病史、解剖肿瘤范围、组织学和功能目标。