Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal & Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.057. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
Parents play a crucial role in facilitating depression treatment for adolescents, yet parental preferences for adolescent treatments are ill-understood. Past treatment experience and belief in a biological model of depression may impact preferences, and warrant investigation.
Parents (N = 143) of teens (12-18 years) completed a survey assessing preference for adolescent depression treatments, treatment knowledge, and beliefs about the biological etiology of depression. Details about parents' and adolescents' past mental health concerns and treatment were obtained. Parents indicated degree of preference from 0 (Not at all preferable) - 10 (Highly preferable) for six treatment options (counselling, antidepressant medication, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, exercise, no treatment) for three adolescents vignettes depicting varying depression severity (Mild/Moderate, Severe, and Treatment-Resistant).
Mean preference ratings across all vignette severities were high for counselling (range: 8.57-9.38) and exercise (range: 9.04-9.25). Multiple regression revealed parental past experience of psychopharmacological treatment was significantly associated with current preference for adolescent antidepressant medication, with increased helpfulness and milder/fewer adverse events associated with stronger preference. Greater perceived helpfulness of past teen psychopharmacological treatment was significantly associated with greater current parental preference for adolescent antidepressant medication. Strength of biological beliefs and counselling preference were significantly positively associated.
Sample was highly educated, predominately female, and majority treatment-utilizing limiting the generalizability of findings.
Parents' own past medication experiences and degree of biological etiological beliefs appear to be associated with current teen depression treatment preferences. Counselling and exercise were highly preferred across depression severity.
父母在促进青少年抑郁症治疗方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但父母对青少年治疗方法的偏好却知之甚少。过去的治疗经验和对抑郁症生物学模型的信念可能会影响他们的偏好,值得进一步研究。
12-18 岁青少年的父母(N=143)完成了一项调查,评估他们对青少年抑郁症治疗方法的偏好、治疗知识以及对抑郁症生物学病因的信念。调查还获取了父母和青少年过去心理健康问题和治疗的详细信息。父母为三个描述不同抑郁严重程度(轻度/中度、重度和治疗抵抗)的青少年病例选择了六个治疗方案(咨询、抗抑郁药物、重复经颅磁刺激、电抽搐治疗、运动和不治疗),从 0(完全不推荐)到 10(非常推荐)进行了偏好程度的评分。
所有病例严重程度的平均偏好评分均较高,咨询(范围:8.57-9.38)和运动(范围:9.04-9.25)。多元回归显示,父母过去接受精神药理学治疗的经历与他们目前对青少年抗抑郁药物治疗的偏好显著相关,治疗效果越好、不良反应越少,父母的偏好就越强烈。过去青少年精神药理学治疗的效果越好,父母对青少年抗抑郁药物治疗的当前偏好就越强。对生物治疗效果的信念越强,对咨询的偏好程度就越高。
样本受教育程度较高,女性居多,且大多数都接受过治疗,限制了研究结果的推广。
父母自身过去的用药经历和对生物病因的信念程度似乎与当前青少年抑郁症治疗偏好有关。咨询和运动在不同抑郁严重程度下都受到高度青睐。