Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Aug;49(8):1601-1616. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01251-9. Epub 2020 May 29.
In early-mid adolescence, parent-teen conflicts become more intense and parents' displays of warmth tend to decline temporarily. Daily increases of parent-teen conflict have been linked to concurrent increases in adolescent emotional distress, yet greater average levels of parental warmth are known to buffer adolescents' response to daily stressors such as interpersonal conflict. It is unclear whether daily increases in parental warmth may also function as a protective buffer that attenuates the daily association between parent-teen conflict and individuals' well-being. The present study aimed to fill an important gap in the literature by examining daily (within-person) fluctuations, and average between-person differences, in parental warmth as potential moderators of the daily association between parent-teen conflict intensity (defined here by the degree of negative emotions in parent-teen interactions) and well-being (distress, positive affect, and self-esteem) of both parents and adolescents. Data are based on daily reports from 120 parents-adolescents dyads recruited from a primary care practice in the Northeastern U.S. Almost all parents were mothers (M = 44.55, SD = 6.36), 61% of adolescents were female (M = 14.36, SD = 0.88), and 66% of dyads were African American. Multilevel modeling was used to assess the daily association between parent-teen conflict and well-being and examine daily and person-level (across-days) warmth as moderators of that association. Examining daily parental warmth as a moderator addressed whether the daily association between conflict and well-being varied as a function of when parental warmth increased or decreased within individuals (relative to individuals' own daily average). In contrast, examining person-level mean warmth as a moderator addressed whether the daily association between conflict and well-being varied as a function of who, on average, reported higher vs. lower levels of parental warmth. As expected, both parents and adolescents reported significantly lower well-being on days they experienced more conflict than usual. Daily fluctuations in parental warmth did not moderate the daily associations between conflict and well-being in parents or adolescents, indicating that the daily association did not change when parents were warmer than usual. In adolescents, the daily associations between conflict and distress, as well as conflict and positive affect, were moderated by person-mean levels of parental warmth, such that daily increases in conflict were associated with higher distress and lower positive affect (on the same day) primarily among adolescents with average or below average levels of parental warmth. Daily conflict was not associated with lower well-being among adolescents with higher-than-average levels of parental warmth. In parents, neither daily nor person-level warmth moderated the daily association between conflict and well-being, suggesting that the negative, daily association between conflict and well-being did not change as a function of parents' daily or average perceptions of warmth. These findings suggest that isolated, day-specific increases in warmth may be less protective than high, stable levels of parental warmth in mitigating the daily association between parent-teen conflict and adolescent well-being.
在青少年早期和中期,父母与青少年之间的冲突变得更加激烈,父母的温暖程度也往往会暂时下降。每日增加的亲子冲突与青少年的情绪困扰呈正相关,但已知更大的父母温暖平均水平可以缓冲青少年对日常压力源(如人际冲突)的反应。目前尚不清楚每日增加的父母温暖是否也可以作为一种保护缓冲,从而减轻亲子冲突强度与个人幸福感之间的日常关联。本研究旨在通过检查父母温暖的日常(个体内)波动和平均个体间差异,来填补文献中的一个重要空白,以探讨其作为亲子冲突强度(这里定义为亲子互动中的负面情绪程度)与父母和青少年的幸福感(困扰、积极情绪和自尊)之间的日常关联的潜在调节因素。数据基于美国东北部一家初级保健诊所招募的 120 对父母-青少年的日常报告。几乎所有的父母都是母亲(M=44.55,SD=6.36),61%的青少年是女性(M=14.36,SD=0.88),66%的亲子组是非洲裔美国人。使用多层次模型来评估亲子冲突与幸福感之间的日常关联,并检验日常和个体水平(跨天)温暖作为该关联的调节因素。检验父母温暖作为一个调节因素,目的是确定冲突与幸福感之间的日常关联是否会随着个体内部温暖的增加或减少而变化(相对于个体自身的日常平均水平)。相比之下,检验个体平均温暖作为一个调节因素,目的是确定冲突与幸福感之间的日常关联是否会随着报告较高或较低水平父母温暖的个体的变化而变化。正如预期的那样,父母和青少年都报告说,当他们经历比平时更多的冲突时,他们的幸福感明显降低。父母温暖的日常波动并没有调节父母或青少年中冲突与幸福感之间的日常关联,这表明当父母比平时更温暖时,日常关联不会改变。在青少年中,冲突与困扰以及冲突与积极情绪之间的日常关联受到父母平均水平的调节,这意味着日常冲突的增加与更高的困扰和更低的积极情绪(在同一天)相关,主要发生在父母温暖程度平均或低于平均水平的青少年中。在父母温暖程度高于平均水平的青少年中,日常冲突与幸福感较低无关。在父母中,无论是日常还是个体水平的温暖都没有调节冲突与幸福感之间的日常关联,这表明冲突与幸福感之间的负面日常关联不会随着父母对温暖的日常或平均感知而改变。这些发现表明,孤立的、特定于一天的温暖增加可能不如父母温暖的高、稳定水平更能缓解亲子冲突与青少年幸福感之间的日常关联。