Department of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Universitaetsplatz 1, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany.
Department of Nursing Sciences and Clinical Nursing, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02780-5.
Evaluation of the current physical therapy practice for German stroke rehabilitation with respect to the 'Rehabilitation of Mobility after Stroke (ReMoS)' guideline recommendations and the associated implementation factors.
A descriptive cross-sectional study employing an online survey was performed among German physical therapists in 2019. The survey consisted of three sections with open and closed questions: 1) self-reported use of ReMoS recommendations, 2) barriers of guideline use and 3) socio-demographic characteristics. The benchmark level for guideline adherent physical therapy was set at > 80%.
Data from 170 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Participants' mean age was 41.6 years, 69.4% were female, while 60.1% had no academic degree. The ReMoS guideline was unknown to 52.9% of the responders. Out of all the 46 ReMoS guideline recommendations, only 'intensive walking training without a treadmill' was reported to be performed in a guideline adherent manner. Respondents usually denied any personal limitations, such as limited knowledge, or that the ReMoS guideline did not fit their routine practice.
Among German physical therapists, the ReMoS guideline is not well-known and many interventions are not performed as recommended, illustrating the discrepancies between the ReMoS guideline recommendations and current physical therapy practice. Interventions aimed at overcoming this gap should consider both knowledge of existing barriers and facilitators of guideline usage.
The study was retrospectively registered to the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00026681 ).
评估德国脑卒中康复治疗中的现行物理治疗实践,以了解《脑卒中后移动能力康复(ReMoS)》指南建议及相关实施因素。
2019 年,采用在线问卷调查的方式对德国物理治疗师进行了一项描述性横断面研究。调查由三部分组成,包括开放性和封闭性问题:1)自我报告对 ReMoS 建议的使用情况;2)使用指南的障碍;3)社会人口学特征。指南遵循性物理治疗的基准水平设定为>80%。
对 170 份问卷的数据进行了分析,参与者的平均年龄为 41.6 岁,69.4%为女性,60.1%没有学术学位。52.9%的受访者不知道 ReMoS 指南。在所有 46 项 ReMoS 指南建议中,只有“无跑步机的强化步行训练”被报告为以指南为基础进行。受访者通常否认存在任何个人限制,例如知识有限,或 ReMoS 指南不适合他们的常规实践。
在德国物理治疗师中,ReMoS 指南的知名度不高,许多干预措施并未按照建议进行,这表明 ReMoS 指南建议与当前物理治疗实践之间存在差距。旨在克服这一差距的干预措施应同时考虑到现有指南使用障碍和促进因素的知识。
该研究已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00026681)进行了回顾性注册。