• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对基因检测使用的态度及社会人口决定因素;2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据。

Attitudes towards and sociodemographic determinants of genetic test usage in the USA; data from the Health Information National Trend Survey, 2020.

机构信息

CATALYST- The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):57-67. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1620. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1620
PMID:35908205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087577/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the trends in who obtains genetic tests, and opinions about how genes affect health. Cross-sectional survey data from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, Cycle 4 was used. This data was collected from adults 18 years of age or older who completed mailed surveys sent by the National Cancer Institute between January and April 2020. The sample consisted of 2,947 respondents who answered the question 'Have you ever had a genetic test'? 727 had a test and 2,220 did not have a test. The measures used included survey questions that asked whether respondents obtained certain kinds of genetic tests, who they shared test results with, whether they believed genes affect health status, and their demographic and cancer status information. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to assess which demographic variables were associated with having different kinds of genetic tests, and whether those who had genetic tests had different opinions about genetic testing and the influence of genes on health. We found that female respondents [OR: 1.9; CI: (1.2-3.1)] had higher odds of having any genetic tests while Hispanic [OR: 0.5; CI: (0.2-1.0)] respondents had lower odds. Our findings indicate that there are demographic disparities in who received genetic tests, and that cancer risk alone does not explain the differences in prevalence of genetic testing.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨接受基因检测的人群趋势,以及他们对基因如何影响健康的看法。本研究使用了来自国家癌症研究所(National Cancer Institute)于 2020 年 1 月至 4 月间通过邮寄问卷对 18 岁及以上成年人进行的健康信息全国趋势调查(Health Information National Trends Survey,HINTS)5 期 4 轮调查的数据。该数据来自 2947 名回答了“你是否接受过基因检测”问题的受访者,其中 727 人接受了检测,2220 人未接受检测。所用的测量方法包括调查问题,询问受访者是否接受了某些类型的基因检测、与谁分享了检测结果、他们是否相信基因会影响健康状况,以及他们的人口统计学和癌症状况信息。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估哪些人口统计学变量与接受不同类型的基因检测有关,以及接受基因检测的人对基因检测和基因对健康的影响有何不同看法。我们发现,女性受访者(OR:1.9;CI:1.2-3.1)接受任何基因检测的可能性更高,而西班牙裔受访者(OR:0.5;CI:0.2-1.0)的可能性更低。我们的研究结果表明,接受基因检测的人群存在人口统计学差异,而癌症风险本身并不能解释基因检测流行率的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a7/10087577/e9ad84207118/JGC4-32-57-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a7/10087577/e9ad84207118/JGC4-32-57-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a7/10087577/e9ad84207118/JGC4-32-57-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudes towards and sociodemographic determinants of genetic test usage in the USA; data from the Health Information National Trend Survey, 2020.美国对基因检测使用的态度及社会人口决定因素;2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):57-67. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1620. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.城乡和种族-民族之间对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认识差异。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5190-6.
3
Predictors of Population Awareness of Cancer Genetic Tests: Implications for Enhancing Equity in Engaging in Cancer Prevention and Precision Medicine.癌症遗传检测的公众认知度预测因素:对增进参与癌症预防和精准医学的公平性的启示。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 3;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00231. eCollection 2021.
4
Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.种族差异导致省略 Oncotype DX 检测,但在完成 Oncotype DX 检测结果后,种族差异并不影响接受化疗。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Health disparities in awareness of physical activity and cancer prevention: findings from the National Cancer Institute's 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).身体活动和癌症预防意识方面的健康差距:美国国家癌症研究所 2007 年健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)的结果。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3(0 3):60-77. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522694.
6
Persistent Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Knowledge and Sociodemographic Determinants of Papanicolaou and Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women in the United States.持续性的宫颈癌筛查参与率差距:美国女性巴氏涂片检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测的知识与社会人口学决定因素。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(4):483-491. doi: 10.1177/0033354920925094. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing.临床和直接面向消费者的基因检测利用中的人口统计学差异。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):634-643. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1193. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Odds of talking to healthcare providers as the initial source of healthcare information: updated cross-sectional results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).作为医疗保健信息的最初来源与医疗服务提供者交谈的几率:来自健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的最新横断面结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0805-7.
9
Engagement with Genetic Information and Uptake of Genetic Testing: the Role of Trust and Personal Cancer History.对基因信息的接触与基因检测的接受情况:信任和个人癌症病史的作用
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1160-9.
10
Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知:来自2013年美国健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0784-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Beliefs and perceptions of genetic testing by clinical, demographic, and health characteristics: A U.S.-based study utilizing the health information national trends (HINTS) survey.基于临床、人口统计学和健康特征的基因检测信念与认知:一项利用美国健康信息国家趋势(HINTS)调查的美国研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Aug 8;57:103204. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103204. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Neighborhood Disadvantage and Genetic Testing Use Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.美国成年人全国代表性样本中的邻里劣势与基因检测使用情况
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251342102. doi: 10.1177/21501319251342102. Epub 2025 May 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Testing for All: Overcoming Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Genetic Testing.全民基因检测:克服卵巢癌基因检测中的差异
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-12. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_350292.
2
Genetic Evaluation for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among African Americans: A Critical Review.非裔美国人遗传性癌症综合征的遗传评估:一项批判性综述。
Oncologist. 2022 Apr 5;27(4):285-291. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab082.
3
Disparities in Genetic Testing for Heritable Solid-Tumor Malignancies.遗传性实体瘤恶性肿瘤基因检测的差异。
Sociodemographic and health factors associated with genetic testing in Australia: insights from a cohort-based study of 45,061 participants.
澳大利亚与基因检测相关的社会人口学和健康因素:来自一项对45,061名参与者的队列研究的见解。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01816-x.
4
Genetic Testing Among Breast Cancer Patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Single-Center Experience.沙特阿拉伯东部地区乳腺癌患者的基因检测:单中心经验。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):1351-1357. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00296-4. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022 Jan;31(1):109-126. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Genetic Testing at a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心的基因检测中的种族和民族差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06064-x. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.直接面向消费者的基因检测后的遗传咨询:消费者的观点。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):329-334. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1309. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing.临床和直接面向消费者的基因检测利用中的人口统计学差异。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):634-643. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1193. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5688.
8
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):652-665. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987.
9
A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients.遗传性癌症基因检测临床指南:对 165000 例高危患者中基因特异性癌症相关性和基因检测标准敏感性的队列评估。
Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):407-415. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0633-8. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services.谁在第三垒?第三方基因解读服务的监管。
Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):4-11. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0627-6. Epub 2019 Aug 12.