Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Genetic Risk Assessment Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06064-x. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
Prior studies suggest that referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing vary by race/ethnicity; however, the data are limited.
We sought to evaluate patterns of genetic testing and clinical outcomes across race/ethnicity at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center.
The medical records for all patients undergoing genetic assessment at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center were reviewed and stratified by self-reported race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and Asian).
A total of 1666 patients met inclusion criteria (non-Hispanic Whites, 1367; Hispanics, 85, non-Hispanic Blacks, 101; Asians, 113).
Demographics, patient characteristics, and referral patterns for patients who underwent genetic testing were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact tests, stratifying by self-reported race/ethnicity. Pathogenic mutations and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reviewed. Outcomes of patients with genetic mutations and personal history of breast and/or gynecologic malignancies were compared.
Non-Hispanic Whites were more likely to be referred due to family cancer history compared to all other ethnicities while Non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians were more likely to be referred due to personal history of cancer (p < 0.001). Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were more likely to have advanced-stage cancer at the time of genetic testing (p < 0.02). Rates of mutations did not differ by race/ethnicity when Ashkenazi Jewish patients were excluded (p = 0.08). Among patients found to have a BRCA1/2 mutation, Non-Hispanic Whites were more likely to undergo cancer screening and risk-reducing surgery compared with all other ethnicities (p = 0.04).
Minority patients were more likely to utilize genetic services following a cancer diagnosis and less likely due to family cancer history, suggesting a missed opportunity for mutation detection and cancer prevention in this population. Efforts to eradicate racial/ethnic disparities in early access to genetic testing and guided cancer prevention strategies are essential.
先前的研究表明,遗传咨询的转介和基因检测的完成因种族/民族而异;然而,数据有限。
我们旨在评估遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心的种族/民族之间的基因检测和临床结果模式。
对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心接受基因评估的所有患者的病历进行回顾,并按自我报告的种族/民族(非西班牙裔白人、西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人、和亚洲人)进行分层。
共有 1666 名符合纳入标准的患者(非西班牙裔白人,1367 名;西班牙裔,85 名,非西班牙裔黑人,101 名;亚洲人,113 名)。
采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验,按自我报告的种族/民族分层,分析接受基因检测的患者的人口统计学、患者特征和转介模式。审查致病性突变和意义不明的变异(VUS)。比较有基因突变和个人乳腺癌和/或妇科恶性肿瘤病史的患者的结局。
与其他所有种族相比,非西班牙裔白人因家族癌症史而更有可能被转介,而非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲人则更有可能因癌症个人史而被转介(p<0.001)。非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔在接受基因检测时更有可能患有晚期癌症(p<0.02)。排除阿什肯纳兹犹太人患者后,种族/民族之间的突变率没有差异(p=0.08)。在发现 BRCA1/2 突变的患者中,与所有其他种族相比,非西班牙裔白人更有可能接受癌症筛查和降低风险的手术(p=0.04)。
少数民族患者更有可能在癌症诊断后利用基因服务,而不太可能因家族癌症史而利用,这表明在该人群中存在错过突变检测和癌症预防的机会。消除早期获得基因检测和指导癌症预防策略方面的种族/民族差异的努力至关重要。