Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Saiseikai Toyama Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;180:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.045. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
Although time in target range (TTR) of systolic blood pressure (BP), an index of consistency of BP control, is reportedly associated with major cardiovascular outcomes, the impact of BP-TTR on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, we performed a post hoc analysis to clarify it in patients with NVAF using data of the J-RHYTHM registry. Of 7,406 outpatients with NVAF, 7,226 (age, 70 ± 10 years; men, 71%), in whom BP was measured 4 times or more (15 ± 5 times) during the 2-year follow-up period or until occurrence of an event, constituted the study group. Systolic BP-TTR, with a target range of 110 to 130 mm Hg, was calculated by Rosendaal linear interpolation method. Overall systolic BP-TTR was 50 ± 28%. Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death occurred in 110 (1.5%), 121 (1.7%), 168 (2.3%), and 60 patients (0.8%), respectively. Each 1% increase in systolic BP-TTR was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all adverse events in the unadjusted model; whereas, significant association was observed only for cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.983, 95% confidence interval 0.971 to 0.995, p = 0.006) after adjusting for known confounders and systolic BP at the time closest to an event. In contrast, each 1% increase in systolic BP time in subtarget range of <110 mm Hg was significantly associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (hazard ratio 1.014, 95% confidence interval 1.005 to 1.024, p = 0.002). In conclusion, systolic BP-TTR and BP time in subtarget range would be useful for risk evaluation of cardiovascular death and thromboembolism, respectively, in patients with NVAF.
尽管收缩压(BP)的目标范围内时间(TTR)作为血压控制一致性的指标,与主要心血管结局相关,但在非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,BP-TTR 对不良事件的影响尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们使用 J-RHYTHM 登记处的数据进行了一项事后分析,以澄清 NVAF 患者中的这一情况。在 7406 名 NVAF 门诊患者中,7226 名(年龄 70 ± 10 岁;男性 71%)在 2 年随访期间或直至发生事件时,BP 测量了 4 次或更多次(15 ± 5 次),构成了研究组。采用 Rosendaal 线性插值法计算收缩压 TTR,目标范围为 110 至 130 mmHg。总收缩压 TTR 为 50 ± 28%。血栓栓塞、大出血、全因死亡和心血管死亡分别发生在 110 例(1.5%)、121 例(1.7%)、168 例(2.3%)和 60 例(0.8%)患者中。在未调整模型中,收缩压 TTR 每增加 1%,所有不良事件的发生率均显著降低;而在调整已知混杂因素和最接近事件时的收缩压后,仅观察到心血管死亡的显著相关性(调整后的危险比 0.983,95%置信区间 0.971 至 0.995,p=0.006)。相比之下,收缩压时间处于 <110mmHg 的亚目标范围内每增加 1%,与血栓栓塞风险增加显著相关(危险比 1.014,95%置信区间 1.005 至 1.024,p=0.002)。总之,在 NVAF 患者中,收缩压 TTR 和收缩压时间处于亚目标范围内可分别用于评估心血管死亡和血栓栓塞的风险。