Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Nippon Medical School Tama-Nagayama Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Saiseikai Toyama Hospital Toyama Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 5;10(1):e018585. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018585. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Background Blood pressure (BP) variability has reportedly been a risk factor for various clinical events. To clarify the influence of BP visit-to-visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a post hoc analysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry was performed. Methods and Results Of 7406 outpatients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from 158 institutions, 7226 (age, 69.7±9.9 years; men, 70.7%), in whom BP was measured 4 times or more (14.6±5.0 times) during the 2-year follow-up period or until occurrence of an event, constituted the study group. SD and coefficient of variation of BP values were calculated as BP variability. Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death occurred in 110 (1.5%), 121 (1.7%), and 168 (2.3%) patients, respectively. When patients were divided into quartiles of systolic BP-SD (<8.20, 8.20-10.49, 10.50-13.19, and ≥13.20 mm Hg), hazard ratios (HRs) for all adverse events were significantly high in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile (HR, 2.00, 95% CI, 1.15-3.49, =0.015 for thromboembolism; HR, 2.60, 95% CI, 1.36-4.97, =0.004 for major hemorrhage; and HR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.11-3.07, =0.018 for all-cause death) after adjusting for components of the CHADS-VASc score, warfarin and antiplatelet use, atrial fibrillation type, BP measurement times, and others. These findings were consistent when BP-coefficient of variation was used instead of BP-SD. Conclusions Systolic BP visit-to-visit variability was significantly associated with all adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to clarify the causality between BP variability and adverse outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000001569.
据报道,血压(BP)变异性是各种临床事件的危险因素。为了阐明非瓣膜性心房颤动患者 BP 随访间变异性对不良事件的影响,对 J-RHYTHM 登记进行了事后分析。
在来自 158 个机构的 7406 名非瓣膜性心房颤动门诊患者中,7226 名患者(年龄 69.7±9.9 岁;男性 70.7%)在 2 年随访期间或直至发生事件时测量了 4 次或更多次 BP(14.6±5.0 次),构成了研究组。BP 值的标准差和变异系数被计算为 BP 变异性。110 例(1.5%)、121 例(1.7%)和 168 例(2.3%)患者发生血栓栓塞、大出血和全因死亡。当患者被分为收缩压-SD 四分位数(<8.20、8.20-10.49、10.50-13.19 和≥13.20 mm Hg)时,最高四分位数的所有不良事件的危险比(HR)明显高于最低四分位数(HR,2.00,95%CI,1.15-3.49,=0.015 血栓栓塞;HR,2.60,95%CI,1.36-4.97,=0.004 大出血;和 HR,1.85,95%CI,1.11-3.07,=0.018 全因死亡),在调整 CHADS-VASc 评分、华法林和抗血小板药物使用、心房颤动类型、BP 测量次数等因素后。当使用 BP 变异系数代替 BP-SD 时,这些发现仍然一致。
非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的收缩压随访间变异性与所有不良事件显著相关。需要进一步研究来阐明非瓣膜性心房颤动患者 BP 变异性与不良结局之间的因果关系。