Suppr超能文献

肝移植术后脾动脉盗血综合征——预防还是治疗?:一例病例报告及文献综述

Splenic artery steal syndrome after liver transplantation - prophylaxis or treatment?: A case report and literature review.

作者信息

Usai Sofia, Colasanti Marco, Meniconi Roberto Luca, Ferretti Stefano, Guglielmo Nicola, Mariano Germano, Berardi Giammauro, Cinquepalmi Matteo, Angrisani Marco, Ettorre Giuseppe Maria

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Nov 30;26(4):386-394. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-004. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

Splenic artery steal syndrome (SASS) is a cause of graft hypoperfusion leading to the development of biliary tract complications, graft failure, and in some cases to retransplantation. Its management is still controversial since there is no universal consensus about its prophylaxis and consequently treatment. We present a case of SASS that occurred 48 hours after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) in a 56-year-old male patient with alcoholic cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, and who was successfully treated by splenic artery embolization. A literature search was performed using the PubMed database, and a total of 22 studies including 4,789 patients who underwent OLTx were relevant to this review. A prophylactic treatment was performed in 260 cases (6.2%) through splenic artery ligation in 98 patients (37.7%) and splenic artery banding in 102 (39.2%). In the patients who did not receive prophylaxis, SASS occurred after OLTx in 266 (5.5%) and was mainly treated by splenic artery embolization (78.9%). Splenic artery ligation and splenectomies were performed, respectively, in 6 and 20 patients (2.3% and 7.5%). The higher rate of complications registered was represented by biliary tract complications (9.7% in patients who received prophylaxis and 11.6% in patients who developed SASS), portal vein thrombosis (respectively, 7.3% and 6.9%), splenectomy (4.8% and 20.9%), and death from sepsis (4.8% and 30.2%). Whenever possible, prevention is the best way to approach SASS, considering all the potential damage arising from an arterial graft hypoperfusion. Where clinical conditions do not permit prophylaxis, an accurate risk assessment and postoperative monitoring are mandatory.

摘要

脾动脉盗血综合征(SASS)是导致移植物灌注不足的原因,可引发胆道并发症、移植物功能衰竭,在某些情况下还需再次移植。由于对于其预防措施乃至治疗方法尚无普遍共识,因此其治疗仍存在争议。我们报告一例56岁酒精性肝硬化伴严重门静脉高压的男性患者,在原位肝移植(OLTx)术后48小时发生SASS,并通过脾动脉栓塞成功治疗。使用PubMed数据库进行文献检索,共有22项研究纳入了4789例行OLTx的患者,与本综述相关。260例(6.2%)患者接受了预防性治疗,其中98例(37.7%)通过脾动脉结扎,102例(39.2%)通过脾动脉束带术。未接受预防性治疗的患者中,266例(5.5%)在OLTx术后发生SASS,主要治疗方法为脾动脉栓塞(78.9%)。分别有6例和20例患者(2.3%和7.5%)进行了脾动脉结扎和脾切除术。记录到的较高并发症发生率包括胆道并发症(接受预防性治疗的患者为9.7%,发生SASS的患者为11.6%)、门静脉血栓形成(分别为7.3%和6.9%)、脾切除术(4.8%和20.9%)以及败血症死亡(4.8%和30.2%)。考虑到动脉移植物灌注不足可能带来的所有潜在损害,只要有可能,预防是应对SASS的最佳方法。在临床情况不允许进行预防时,准确的风险评估和术后监测是必不可少的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f1a/9721243/181376923eeb/ahbps-26-4-386-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验