Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine.
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):745-750. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006690.
The quality of evidence from medical research is partially deemed by the hierarchy of study designs. On the lowest level, the hierarchy of study designs begins with animal and translational studies and expert opinion, and then ascends to descriptive case reports or case series, followed by analytic observational designs such as cohort studies, then randomized controlled trials, and finally systematic reviews and meta-analyses as the highest quality evidence. This hierarchy of evidence in the medical literature is a foundational concept for pediatric hospitalists, given its relevance to key steps of evidence-based practice, including efficient literature searches and prioritization of the highest-quality designs for critical appraisal, to address clinical questions. Consideration of the hierarchy of evidence can also aid researchers in designing new studies by helping them determine the next level of evidence needed to improve upon the quality of currently available evidence. Although the concept of the hierarchy of evidence should be taken into consideration for clinical and research purposes, it is important to put this into context of individual study limitations through meticulous critical appraisal of individual articles.
医学研究的证据质量部分取决于研究设计的层次。在最低层次上,研究设计的层次从动物和转化研究以及专家意见开始,然后上升到描述性病例报告或病例系列,接着是分析性观察设计,如队列研究,然后是随机对照试验,最后是系统评价和荟萃分析,作为最高质量的证据。这一医学文献中的证据层次结构是儿科医院医生的一个基本概念,因为它与循证实践的关键步骤相关,包括高效的文献搜索和对关键评估的最高质量设计进行优先级排序,以解决临床问题。考虑证据的层次结构也可以帮助研究人员通过确定设计新研究所需的下一级证据来提高现有证据的质量。尽管出于临床和研究目的应考虑证据层次结构的概念,但通过对单个文章进行细致的批判性评估,将其置于个别研究局限性的背景下也很重要。