Suppr超能文献

疑似利多卡因超敏反应患者皮肤试验结果与既往表现之间的相关性

Correlation between skin test results and historical manifestations in patients with suspected lidocaine hypersensitivity.

作者信息

Khalil Sally, Taha Salma, Al-Nesf Maryam

机构信息

Allergy Immunology division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar E-mail:

出版信息

Qatar Med J. 2022 Mar 28;2022(2):16. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.fqac.16. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse reactions to local anesthetics (LA) are relatively common; however, true IgE-mediated allergy is extremely rare, estimated to occur in less than 1%. Investigating patients with suspected allergy to LA should begin with a detailed history to exclude other more common operation theater related culprit medications, followed by skin testing. The subcutaneous challenge is considered the gold standard for confirming true IgE-mediated allergy to LA. In this study, we have described the skin prick test results of patients with suspected lidocaine allergy who had historical reaction symptoms typical to IgE-mediated allergic reactions.

METHODS

The data were retrieved from the allergy procedure log registry for patients who were referred to the allergy clinic with a suspected allergic reaction to lidocaine at the Hamad Medical Corporation between 2016 and 2020. These patients' symptoms of historical reactions to lidocaine were compared to their skin test results.

RESULT

A total of 7 patients were identified. The skin test result for lidocaine was positive in only 1 patient; his historical reaction was anaphylaxis (urticaria/angioedema and shortness of breath). The remaining 6 patients had a negative result for skin and challenge tests. Of these 6 patients with negative results, 4 had only urticaria/angioedema as historical reactions; 1 had systematic manifestation (tachycardia) along with urticaria/angioedema, and 1 experienced systemic symptoms (shortness of breath, chest pain, and palpitation) with no skin or mucous membrane involvement (Table 1).

CONCLUSION

Negative skin test and subcutaneous challenge with a history of generalized cutaneous symptoms and/or systemic symptoms during the reaction to LA can be attributed to many causes, such as an IgE-mediated reaction against a component other than lidocaine (e.g., latex), medication side effects (adrenaline in combined preparations), and/or symptoms of primary disease (chronic spontaneous urticaria/angioedema).

摘要

背景

局部麻醉药(LA)的不良反应相对常见;然而,真正由免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的过敏极为罕见,估计发生率低于1%。对疑似LA过敏的患者进行调查时,应首先详细询问病史,以排除其他更常见的与手术室相关的可疑药物,然后进行皮肤试验。皮下激发试验被认为是确诊真正由IgE介导的LA过敏的金标准。在本研究中,我们描述了疑似利多卡因过敏且有IgE介导的过敏反应典型既往症状的患者的皮肤点刺试验结果。

方法

数据取自2016年至2020年期间因疑似对利多卡因过敏而转诊至哈马德医疗公司过敏诊所的患者的过敏检查记录登记册。将这些患者利多卡因既往反应的症状与其皮肤试验结果进行比较。

结果

共识别出7例患者。仅1例患者利多卡因皮肤试验结果呈阳性;其既往反应为过敏反应(荨麻疹/血管性水肿和呼吸急促)。其余6例患者皮肤试验和激发试验结果均为阴性。在这6例结果为阴性的患者中,4例既往反应仅为荨麻疹/血管性水肿;1例除荨麻疹/血管性水肿外还有全身表现(心动过速),1例出现全身症状(呼吸急促、胸痛和心悸)但无皮肤或黏膜受累(表1)。

结论

LA反应期间出现全身性皮肤症状和/或全身症状且皮肤试验和皮下激发试验结果为阴性,可能有多种原因,如针对利多卡因以外成分(如乳胶)的IgE介导反应、药物副作用(复方制剂中的肾上腺素)和/或原发性疾病症状(慢性自发性荨麻疹/血管性水肿)。

相似文献

6
The Eyes Have It: Eyelid Swelling and Rash in a 79-year-old Woman With Macular Degeneration.问题出在眼睛:一名79岁黄斑变性女性的眼睑肿胀与皮疹。
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2018 May 1;9:2152656718763385. doi: 10.1177/2152656718763385. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
9
Suspected allergy to local anaesthetics: follow-up in 135 cases.疑似局部麻醉剂过敏:135 例随访。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):536-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02193.x. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验