Suppr超能文献

二十年局部麻醉药过敏样反应的经验:真正的过敏罕见。

Twenty Years' Experience with Anaphylaxis-Like Reactions to Local Anesthetics: Genuine Allergy is Rare.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):2051-2058.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis-like reactions occur within minutes after the application of local anesthetics (LA), most commonly during dental interventions. Impressive symptoms including respiratory distress or loss of consciousness frequently give rise to a suspicion of allergy and may prompt patients and treating physicians to refuse future LA injections.

OBJECTIVE

Nonallergic mechanisms are responsible for the majority of LA-induced immediate-type reactions. In view of the preponderance of nonallergic reactions, the question arises whether genuine LA allergy may be missed during routine testing procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated clinical data and test results from patients referred to our allergy clinic within the past 20 years for diagnostic workup of LA-induced immediate-type reactions.

RESULTS

Of 402 evaluated patients, 29 had an episode of acute urticaria within 30 minutes after LA injections, and the remaining 373 had a history of mainly subjective cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological complaints. Of the patients reporting urticaria with or without angioedema, 14 were diagnosed with a spontaneous episode of urticaria, 13 had allergic or nonallergic reactions to other agents, and 2 had IgE-mediated LA allergy. LA allergy was definitely excluded by 771 subcutaneous provocation tests with skin test negative LA, thereby demonstrating the high predictive value of negative intradermal testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin testing and provocative LA challenge are useful to exclude LA allergy, and this testing procedure seems to be appropriate to identify the extremely rare cases with IgE-mediated LA allergy.

摘要

背景

局部麻醉剂(LA)应用后几分钟内即可发生类似过敏反应,最常见于牙科干预期间。令人印象深刻的症状包括呼吸窘迫或意识丧失,常引起过敏怀疑,并可能促使患者和治疗医生拒绝未来的 LA 注射。

目的

非过敏机制是大多数 LA 引起的即刻型反应的原因。鉴于非过敏反应的优势,出现了一个问题,即在常规测试过程中是否可能错过真正的 LA 过敏。

方法

我们回顾性评估了过去 20 年来因 LA 诱导的即刻型反应而在我们过敏诊所就诊的患者的临床数据和测试结果。

结果

在评估的 402 名患者中,29 名在 LA 注射后 30 分钟内出现急性荨麻疹,其余 373 名有主要是主观皮肤、呼吸、心血管和神经系统投诉的病史。在报告有或没有血管性水肿的荨麻疹的患者中,14 名被诊断为自发性荨麻疹发作,13 名对其他药物有过敏或非过敏反应,2 名有 IgE 介导的 LA 过敏。771 次皮下激发试验用皮肤试验阴性 LA 明确排除了 LA 过敏,从而证明了皮内试验阴性的高度预测值。

结论

皮肤试验和激发性 LA 挑战有助于排除 LA 过敏,并且该测试程序似乎适合识别非常罕见的 IgE 介导的 LA 过敏病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验